The PROMIS of QALYs

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Hanmer, Janel ^a   Feeny, David ^b,i   Fischhoff, Baruch ^c   Hays, Ron D ^d   Hess, Rachel ^e   Pilkonis, Paul A ^a   Revicki, Dennis A ^f   Roberts, Mark S ^a,g   Tsevat, Joel ^h   Yu, Lan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^f EVIDERA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ Health Utilities Incorporated   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; EQ 5D SCORE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH UTILITIES INDEX; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; MULTI ATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM SCORE; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF WELL BEING INDEX; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARDIZATION; THEORY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT;

HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; SELF REPORT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84938775464     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12955-015-0321-6     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomes. J Am Med Assoc. 1995;273(1):59-65.
2. McDowell I. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford: University Press; 2006.
3. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal - a review. J Health Econ. 1986;5(1):1-30.
4. Fischhoff B. Value elicitation: is there anything in there? Am Psychol. 1991;46(8):835.
5. Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2000.
6. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al. Initial item banks and first wave testing of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) network: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179-94.
7. Fryback DG. Measuring health-related quality of life. Paper prepared for the Workshop on Advancing Social Science Theory: The Importance of Common Metrics. National Academies, Washington, DC, February 25-26, 2010.
8. Revicki DA, Kawata AK, Harnam N, Chen WH, Hays RD, Cella D. Predicting EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items and domain item banks in a United States sample. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(6):783-91.
9. Brazier JE, Yang Y, Tsuchiya A, Rowen DL. A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11(2):215-25.
10. Craig BM, Reeve BB, Brown PM, Cella D, Hays RD, Lipscomb J, et al. US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29. Value Health. 2014;17(8):846-53.
11. Cook KF, Victorson DE, Cella D, Schalet BD, Miller D. Creating meaningful cut-scores for Neuro-QOL measures of fatigue, physical functioning, and sleep disturbance using standard setting with patients and providers. Qual Life Res. 2014;24(3):1-15.