Actors' perceptions of issues in the implementation of the first round of the water framework directive: Examples from the water management and forestry sectors in Southern Sweden

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 2202-2213

  Keskitalo, E Carina H ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Forest; Governance; Sweden; V sterhavet; Water framework directive

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; FORESTRY; TIMBER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

EU-WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVES; EXISTING SYSTEMS; FOREST; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE; NON-POINT SOURCE; SWEDEN; WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVES;

WATER CONSERVATION;

EUROPEAN UNION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; PERCEPTION; POLICY MAKING; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

STRUCTURES; WATER; WATER MANAGEMENT;

SWEDEN;

EID: 84938695269     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w7052202     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Directive 2006/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy (the Water Framework Directive); European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
2. Moss, B. The Water Framework Directive: Total environment or political compromise? Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 400, 32-41.
3. Keskitalo, E.C.H.; Pettersson, M. Implementing multi-level governance? The legal basis and implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive for forestry in Sweden. Environ. Policy Gov. 2012, 22, 90-103.
4. Moss, T.; Newig, J. Multilevel water governance and problems of scale: Setting the stage for a broader debate. Environ. Manag. 2010, 46, 1-6.
5. Liefferink, D.; Wiering, M.; Uitenboogaart, Y. The EU Water Framework Directive: A multi-dimensional analysis of implementation and domestic impact. Land Use Policy 2011, 28, 712-722.
6. Hammer, M.; Balfors, B.; Mörtberg, U.; Petersson, M.; Quin, A. Governance of water resources in the phase of change: A case study of the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Ambio 2011, 40, 210-220.
7. Lundqvist, J.L. Integrating Swedish Water Resource Management: A multi-level governance trilemma. Local Environ. 2004, 9, 413-424.
8. Bratt, A. Municipal officers on implementing the EU water framework directive in Sweden regarding agricultural nutrient flows. Local Environ. 2004, 9, 65-79.
9. Andersson, I.; Pettersson, M.; Jarsjö, J. Impact of the European Water Framework Directive on local-level water management: Case study Oxunda Catchment, Sweden. Land Use Policy 2012, 29, 73-82.
10. Marks, G.; Hooghe, L. Contrasting Visions of Multi-level Governance. In Multi-level Governance; Bache, I., Flinders, M., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004.
11. Vattenmyndigheterna. Hur vattenarbetet planeras. Available online: http://www.vattenmyndigheter na.se/vattenmyndigheten/Om+vattenforvaltning/Vattenplanering/ (accessed on 13 November 2013).
12. Frantzén, F. Berörda intressenters deltagande i vattenförvaltning-Förändring, förnyelse och arv (Stakeholder participation in water management-Change, renewal and legacy). VATTEN J. Water Manag. Res. 2012, 68, 275-283. (In Swedish).
13. Förvaltningsplan Västerhavets Vattendistrikt. Vattenmyndigheten i Västerhavets Vattendistrikt vid Länsstyrelsen i Västra Götalands län; Vattenmyndigheten Västerhavet: Göteborg, Sweden, 2009. (In Swedish).
14. Hedelin, B. Potential Implications of the EU Water Framework Directive in Sweden. Available online: http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed%20articles/refereed14.pdf (accessed on 13 November 2013).
15. Stjernström, O.; Karlsson, S.; Pettersson, Ö. Skogen och den kommunala planeringen. Plan 2013, 1, 42-45.
16. Åtgärdsprogram Västerhavet. Vattenmyndigheten i Västerhavets Vattendistrikt vid Länsstyrelsen i Västra Götalands län; Vattenmyndigheten Västerhavet: Göteborg, Sweden, 2009. (In Swedish).
17. Göta älvs Vattenråds Remissvar på Samrådsmaterial 2009 från Västerhavets Vattendistrikt; Göta älvs Vattenvårdsförbund/Göta River Water Council: Göteborg, Swenden, 31 August 2009. (In Swedish).
18. Swedish Government. Prissatt Vatten? Betänkande av Vattenprisutredningen; Statens offentliga utredningar (SOU): Stockholm, Sweden, 2010.
19. Benner, T.; Reinicke, W.H.; Witte, J.M. Multisectoral networks in global governance: Towards a pluralistic system of accountability. Gov. Oppos. 2004, 39, 191-210.
20. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
21. Hatton-Ellis, T. Editorial: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Water Framework Directive. Aquat. Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2008, 18, 111-116.
22. Beunen, R.; van der Knaap, W.G.M.; Biesbroek, G.R. Implementation and integration of EU environmental directives. Experiences from the Netherlands. Environ. Policy Gov. 2009, 19, 57-69.
23. Kastens, B.; Newig, J. The Water Framework Directive and agricultural nitrate pollution: Will great expectations in Brussels be dashed in Lower Saxony? Eur. Environ. 2007, 17, 231-246.
24. Glachant, M. The need for adaptability in EU environmental policy design and implementation. Eur. Environ. 2001, 11, 239-249.
25. Orr, P.; Colvin, J.; King, D. Involving stakeholders in integrated river basin planning in England and Wales. Water Resour. Manag. 2007, 21, 331-349.
26. Koontz, T.M.; Newig, J. Cross-level information and influence in mandated participatory planning: Alternative pathways to sustainable water management in Germany's implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Land Use Policy 2014, 38, 594-604.
27. Albrecht, J. The Europeanization of water law by the Water Framework Directive: A second chance for water planning in Germany. Land Use Policy 2013, 30, 381-391.
28. Hajer, M. Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void. Policy Sci. 2003, 36, 175-195.
29. Van Leeuwen, J.; van Hoof, L.; van Tatenhove, J. Institutional ambiguity in implementing the European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Mar. Policy 2012, 36, 636-643.