DWI for renal mass characterization: Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 205, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 317-324

  Kang, Stella K ^a   Zhang, Angela ^b   Pandharipande, Pari V ^c   Chandarana, Hersh ^a   Braithwaite, R Scott ^a   Littenberg, Benjamin ^d  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostic test accuracy; DWI; Meta analysis; Renal mass; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY TUMOR; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SENSIBILITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; DIAGNOSTIC USE; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM STAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84938685521     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13930     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. LeBihan D. IVIM method measures diffusion and perfusion. Diagn Imaging (San Franc) 1990; 12:133, 136
2. Lim HK, Kim JK, Kim KA, Cho KS. Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection: a multireader study. Radiology 2009; 250:145-151
3. Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS, et al. Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 2008; 246:812-822
4. El Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3. 0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology 2010; 256:64-73
5. Taouli B, Thakur RK, Mannelli L, et al. Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2009; 251:398-407
6. Kim S, Jain M, Harris AB, et al. T1 hyperintense renal lesions: characterization with diffusionweighted MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2009; 251:796-807
7. Sandrasegaran K, Sundaram CP, Ramaswamy R, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of renal masses. AJR 2010; 194:438-445
8. Wang H, Cheng L, Zhang X, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for subtype differentiation at 3. 0 T. Radiology 2010; 257:135-143
9. Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Blute ML. Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27:612-624
10. Lohse CM, Blute ML, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Cheville JC. Comparison of standardized and nonstandardized nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma to predict outcome among 2,042 patients. Am J Clin Pathol 2002; 118:877-886
11. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al.; QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155:529-536
12. Midgette AS, Stukel TA, Littenberg B. A metaanalytic method for summarizing diagnostic test performances: receiver-operating-characteristicsummary point estimates. Med Decis Making 1993; 13:253-257
13. Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med 1993; 12:1293-1316
14. Littenberg B, Moses LE. Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: a new meta-analytic method. Med Decis Making 1993; 13:313-321
15. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240:1285-1293
16. Agnello F, Roy C, Bazille G, et al. Small solid renal masses: characterization by diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T. Clin Radiol 2013; 68:e301-e308
17. Erbay G, Koc Z, Karadeli E, Kuzgunbay B, Goren MR, Bal N. Evaluation of malignant and benign renal lesions using diffusion-weighted MRI with multiple b values. Acta Radiol 2012; 53:359-365
18. Doanay S, Kocakoç E, Ciçekçi M, Alami S, Akpolat N, Orhan I. Ability and utility of diffusion-weighted MRI with different b values in the evaluation of benign and malignant renal lesions. Clin Radiol 2011; 66:420-425
19. Sevcenco S, Heinz-Peer G, Ponhold L, et al. Utility and limitations of 3-Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation of renal tumors. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83:909-913
20. Amin MB, Crotty TB, Tickoo SK, Farrow GM. Renal oncocytoma: a reappraisal of morphologic features with clinicopathologic findings in 80 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1997; 21:1-12
21. Choi YA, Kim CK, Park SY, Cho SW, Park BK. Subtype differentiation of renal cell carcinoma using diffusion-weighted and blood oxygenation level-dependent MRI. AJR 2014; 203:[web]W78-W84
22. Razek AA, Farouk A, Mousa A, Nabil N. Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in characterization of renal tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011; 35:332-336
23. Goyal A, Sharma R, Bhalla AS, et al. Diffusionweighted MRI in renal cell carcinoma: a surrogate marker for predicting nuclear grade and histological subtype. Acta Radiol 2012; 53:349-358
24. Volpe A, Mattar K, Finelli A, et al. Contemporary results of percutaneous biopsy of 100 small renal masses: a single center experience. J Urol 2008; 180:2333-2337
25. Wang R, Wolf JS Jr, Wood DP Jr, Higgins EJ, Hafez KS. Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in management of small renal masses. Urology 2009; 73:586-590; discussion, 590-591
26. Blumenfeld AJ, Guru K, Fuchs GJ, Kim HL. Percutaneous biopsy of renal cell carcinoma underestimates nuclear grade. Urology 2010; 76:610-613
27. Rosenkrantz AB, Oei M, Babb JS, Niver BE, Taouli B. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdo-men at 3. 0 Tesla: image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility compared with 1. 5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33:128-135
28. Smaldone MC, Kutikov A, Egleston BL, et al. Small renal masses progressing to metastases under active surveillance: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Cancer 2012; 118:997-1006
29. Sun MR, Ngo L, Genega EM, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation of tumor subtypes-correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 2009; 250:793-802
30. Chandarana H, Kang SK, Wong S, et al. Diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of renal tumors with histopathologic correlation. Invest Radiol 2012; 47:688-696
31. Rheinheimer S, Stieltjes B, Schneider F, et al. Investigation of renal lesions by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging applying intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters: initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:e310-e316
32. Chandarana H, Rosenkrantz AB, Mussi TC, et al. Histogram analysis of whole-lesion enhancement in differentiating clear cell from papillary subtype of renal cell cancer. Radiology 2012; 265:790-798
33. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1982; 6:655-663
34. Lebret T, Poulain JE, Molinie V, et al. Percutaneous core biopsy for renal masses: indications, accuracy and results. J Urol 2007; 178:1184-1188; discussion, 1188
35. Lassel EA, Rao R, Schwenke C, Schoenberg SO, Michaely HJ. Diffusion-weighted imaging of focal renal lesions: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2014; 24:241-249
36. Zhang JL, Sigmund EE, Chandarana H, et al. Variability of renal apparent diffusion coefficients: limitations of the monoexponential model for diffusion quantification. Radiology 2010; 254:783-792
37. Rosenkrantz AB, Niver BE, Fitzgerald EF, Babb JS, Chandarana H, Melamed J. Utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient for distinguishing clear cell renal cell carcinoma of low and high nuclear grade. AJR 2010; 195:[web]W344-W351