Fabrication and characterization of polyacrylamide/silk fibroin hydrogels for peripheral nerve regeneration

Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition

Volumn 26, Issue 14, 2015, Pages 899-916

  Li, Guicai ^a,b   Kong, Yan ^a,b   Zhao, Yinxin ^a,b   Zhao, Yahong ^a,b   Zhang, Luzhong ^a,b   Yang, Yumin ^a,b  

^a NANTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Neural Regeneration Co innovation Center of Jiangsu Province   (China)

Author keywords

polyacrylamide; silk fibroin; hydrogels; Schwann cells; peripheral nerve regeneration; characterization

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BLENDING; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; ETHANOL; NEURONS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

COMPOSITE HYDROGELS; ETHANOL TREATMENT; FABRICATION AND CHARACTERIZATIONS; PERIPHERAL NERVE REGENERATION; PERIPHERAL NERVES; PHYSIO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; SILK FIBROIN; SOLUTION BLENDING;

HYDROGELS;

ALCOHOL; POLYACRYLAMIDE; SILK FIBROIN; ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; FIBROIN; HYDROGEL; WATER;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; HYDROGEL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; IN VITRO STUDY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; L929 CELL LINE; MOUSE; NERVE GRAFT; NERVE REGENERATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHWANN CELL CULTURE; WETTABILITY; ANIMAL; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; CELL CULTURE; CELL LINE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; MATERIALS TESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYMERIZATION; POROSITY; SCHWANN CELL; SPONTANEOUSLY HYPERTENSIVE RAT; SYNTHESIS; TIME FACTOR; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ACRYLIC RESINS; ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; ETHANOL; FIBROINS; HYDROGELS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; NERVE REGENERATION; POLYMERIZATION; POROSITY; RATS, INBRED SHR; SCHWANN CELLS; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; WATER;

EID: 84938604436     PISSN: 09205063     EISSN: 15685624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2015.1066109     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Daly WT, Knight AM, Wang H, et al. Comparison and characterization of multiple biomaterial conduits for peripheral nerve repair. Biomaterials. 2013; 34: 8630-8639. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.086
2. Daly W, Yao L, Zeugolis D, Windebank A, Pandit A. A biomaterials approach to peripheral nerve regeneration: bridging the peripheral nerve gap and enhancing functional recovery. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2012; 9: 202-221. 10.1098/rsif.2011.0438
3. Nectow AR, Marra KG, Kaplan DL. Biomaterials for the development of peripheral nerve guidance conduits. Tissue. Eng. Part B Rev. 2012; 18: 40-50. 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0240
4. Ragel BT, Park GC, Brevard S. Median nerve repair with autologous sciatic nerve graft: a case report. ISRN Surg. 2011; 2011: 120367-120368
5. Nilsson A, Dahlin L, Lundborg G, Kanje M. Graft repair of a peripheral nerve without the sacrifice of a healthy donor nerve by the use of acutely dissociated autologous Schwann cells. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg. 2005; 39: 1-6. 10.1080/02844310410017979
6. Saidin S, Chevallier P, Abdul Kadir MR, Hermawan H, Mantovani D. Polydopamine as an intermediate layer for silver and hydroxyapatite immobilisation on metallic biomaterials surface. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2013; 33: 4715-4724. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.026
7. Ahmed M, Punshon G, Darbyshire A, Seifalian AM. Effects of sterilization treatments on bulk and surface properties of nanocomposite biomaterials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2013; 101: 1182-1190. 10.1002/jbm.b.32928
8. Richards RG, Moriarty TF, Miclau T, McClellan RT, Grainger DW. Advances in biomaterials and surface technologies. J. Orthop. Trauma. 2012; 26: 703-707. 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31826e37a2
9. Ran F, Nie S, Yin Z, Li J, Su B, Sun S, Zhao C. Synthesized negatively charged macromolecules (NCMs) for the surface modification of anticoagulant membrane biomaterials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013; 55: 269-275. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.01.014
10. Ciok-Pater E, Gospodarek E, Prazynska M, Bogiel T. The influence of cell surface hydrophobicity Candida sp. on biofilm formation on different biomaterials. Med. Dosw Mikrobiol. 2009; 61: 267-271
11. Dou XQ, Zhang D, Feng CL. Wettability of supramolecular nanofibers for controlled cell adhesion and proliferation. Langmuir. 2013; 29: 15359-15366. 10.1021/la4040276
12. Lourenco BN, Marchioli G, Song W, et al. Wettability influences cell behavior on superhydrophobic surfaces with different topographies. Biointerphases. 2012; 7: 46
13. Ko J, Mohtaram NK, Ahmed F, et al. Fabrication of poly (ε-caprolactone) microfiber scaffolds with varying topography and mechanical properties for stem cell-based tissue engineering applications. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 2014; 25: 1-17. 10.1080/09205063.2013.830913
14. Missirlis D, Spatz JP. Combined effects of PEG hydrogel elasticity and cell-Adhesive coating on fibroblast adhesion and persistent migration. Biomacromolecules. 2014; 15: 195-205. 10.1021/bm4014827
15. Fotia C, Messina GM, Marletta G, Baldini N, Ciapetti G. Hyaluronan-based pericellular matrix: substrate electrostatic charges and early cell adhesion events. Eur. Cell Mater. 2013; 26: 133-149. Discussion 149
16. Sun H, Zhang A, Yan G, et al. Proteomics study on the hepatoprotective effects of traditional Chinese medicine formulae Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang by a combination of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and matrix-Assisted laser desorption/ionization-Time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2013; 75: 173-179. 10.1016/j.jpba.2012.11.025
17. Zhang J, Guo WH, Rape A, Wang YL. Micropatterning cell adhesion on polyacrylamide hydrogels. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013; 1066: 147-156. 10.1007/978-1-62703-604-7
18. Lakins JN, Chin AR, Weaver VM. Exploring the link between human embryonic stem cell organization and fate using tension-calibrated extracellular matrix functionalized polyacrylamide gels. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012; 916: 317-350. 10.1007/978-1-61779-980-8
19. Akiyama Y, Kikuchi A, Yamato M, Okano T. Accelerated cell-sheet recovery from a surface successively grafted with polyacrylamide and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). Acta Biomater. 2014; 10: 3398-3408
20. Gu Y, Ji Y, Zhao Y, et al. The influence of substrate stiffness on the behavior and functions of Schwann cells in culture. Biomaterials. 2012; 33: 6672-6681. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.006
21. Wang J, Wei Y, Yi H, Liu Z, Sun D, Zhao H. Cytocompatibility of a silk fibroin tubular scaffold. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2014; 34: 429-436. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.09.039
22. Madduri S, Papaloïzos M, Gander B. Trophically and topographically functionalized silk fibroin nerve conduits for guided peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials. 2010; 31: 2323-2334. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.073
23. Uebersax L, Mattotti M, Papaloizos M, Merkle HP, Gander B, Meinel L. Silk fibroin matrices for the controlled release of nerve growth factor (NGF). Biomaterials. 2007; 28: 4449-4460. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.034
24. Yang Y, Chen X, Ding F, Zhang P, Liu J, Gu X. Biocompatibility evaluation of silk fibroin with peripheral nerve tissues and cells in vitro. Biomaterials. 2007; 28: 1643-1652. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.12.004
25. Gu Y, Zhu J, Xue C, et al. Chitosan/silk fibroin-based, Schwann cell-derived extracellular matrix-modified scaffolds for bridging rat sciatic nerve gaps. Biomaterials. 2014; 35: 2253-2263. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.087
26. Tang X, Xue C, Wang Y, Ding F, Yang Y, Gu X. Bridging peripheral nerve defects with a tissue engineered nerve graft composed of an in vitro cultured nerve equivalent and a silk fibroin-based scaffold. Biomaterials. 2012; 33: 3860-3867. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.008
27. Li S, Wu H, Hu XD, et al. Preparation of electrospun PLGA-silk fibroin nanofibers-based nerve conduits and evaluation in vivo. Artif. Cells Blood Substit. Immobil. Biotechnol. 2012; 40: 171-178. 10.3109/10731199.2011.637927
28. Wang G, Hu X, Lin W, Dong C, Wu H. Electrospun PLGA-silk fibroin-collagen nanofibrous scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2011; 47: 234-240. 10.1007/s11626-010-9381-4
29. Mandal BB, Kapoor S, Kundu SC. Silk fibroin/polyacrylamide semi-interpenetrating network hydrogels for controlled drug release. Biomaterials. 2009; 30: 2826-2836. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.040
30. Kundu B, Kundu SC. Silk sericin/polyacrylamide in situ forming hydrogels for dermal reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2012; 33: 7456-7467. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.091
31. Li G, Zhang L, Wang C, et al. Effect of silanization on chitosan porous scaffolds for peripheral nerve regeneration. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014; 101: 718-726. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.064
32. Kaşgöz H, Durmuş A, Kaşgöz A. Enhanced swelling and adsorption properties of AAm-AMPSNa/clay hydrogel nanocomposites for heavy metal ion removal. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008; 19: 213-220. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1581
33. Varvarenko S, Voronov A, Samaryk V, et al. Covalent grafting of polyacrylamide-based hydrogels to a polypropylene surface activated with functional polyperoxide. React. & Funct. Polym. 2010; 70: 647-655
34. Park HJ, Lee JS, Lee OJ, et al. Fabrication of microporous three-dimensional scaffolds from silk fibroin for tissue engineering. Macromol. Res. 2014; 22: 592-599. 10.1007/s13233-014-2083-0
35. Fan SN, Zhang YP, Shao HL, Hu XC. Electrospun regenerated silk fibroin mats with enhanced mechanical properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013; 56: 83-88. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.01.033
36. Fan ZJ, Liu B, Wang JQ, et al. A novel wound dressing based on Ag/graphene polymer hydrogel: effectively kill bacteria and accelerate wound healing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014; 24: 3933-3943. 10.1002/adfm.v24.25
37. Zhang LZ, Dou SF, Li Y, et al. Degradation and compatibility behaviors of poly(glycolic acid) grafted chitosan. Mater. Sci. & Eng. C-Mater. for Biol. Appl. 2013; 33: 2626-2631