Systems biology, interdisciplinarity and disciplinary identity

Collaboration in the New Life Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 201-218

  Calvert, Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938603262     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Barry, A., Born G. and Weszkalnys, G. 2008. Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society, 37, 1, 20-49.
2. BBSRC 2006. Towards a Vision and Road Map for Systems Biology Report from the BBSRC Vision for Systems Biology Workshop, Exeter, 16-17 March 2006.
3. Ben-David J. and Zloczower A. 1991. Universities and academic systems in modern societies, in Scientific Growth: Essays on the Social Organization and Ethos of Science, edited by G. Freudenthal. Berkeley: University of California Press, 125-57.
4. von Bertalanffy, L. 1950. The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science, 111, 23-9.
5. Campbell, J. 2008. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Novato: New World Library.
6. Collins, F.S., Green, E.D., Guttmacher, A.E. and Guyer, M.S. 2003. A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature, 422, 1-13.
7. Collins, H.M. and Evans, R. 2002. The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32 (2), 235-96.
8. Collins, H.M. and Evans, R. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Eddy, S.R. 2005. ‘Antedisciplinary’ science. PLoS Comp Biol, 1, (1), e6.
10. Evans, J. and Randalls, S. 2008. Geography and paratactical interdisciplinarity: Views from the ESRC-NERC PhD studentship programme. Geoforum, 39, 581-92.
11. Fujimura, J.H. 2003. Future imaginaries: Genome scientists as socio-cultural entrepreneurs, in Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science Beyond the Two Culture Divide, edited by A.H. Goodman, D. Heath and M.S. Lindree. Berkeley: University of California Press, 176-99.
12. Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R. 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25, (7), 739-56.
13. Galison, P. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
14. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
15. Gieryn, T. 2002. What buildings do. Theory and Society, 31, 35-74.
16. Glaser, B. 1965. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12, (4), 436-45.
17. Hood, L. 1992. Biology and medicine in the twenty-first century, in The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, edited by D. Kevles and L. Hood. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 136-64.
18. Ideker, T., Galitski, T. and Hood, L.2001. A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2, 343-72.
19. Kitano, H. 2002. Looking beyond the details: A rise in system-oriented approaches in genetics and molecular biology. Current Genetics, 41, 1-10.
20. Kling, J. 2006. Careers in systems biology: Working the systems. Science, 311, (5765), 1305-6.
21. Law, J. 1973. The development of specialities in science: The case of x-ray protein crystallography. Science Studies, 3, (3), 275-303.
22. Lemaine, G., Macleod, R., Mulkay, M. and Weingart, P. 1976. Introduction: Problems, in the emergence of new disciplines, in Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines, edited by G. Lemaine et al. The Hague: Mouton, 1-23.
23. Mattila, E. 2005. Interdisciplinarity ‘in the making’: Modeling infectious diseases. Perspectives on Science, 2005, 13, (4), 531-53.
24. McCarthy, J. 2004. Tackling the challenges of interdisciplinary biosciences. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 5, 933-7.
25. Nowotny, N., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. 2001. Re - Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. London: Polity Press.
26. Penders, B., Horstman, K. and Vos, R. 2007. Proper science in moist biology. EMBO Reports, 8, (7), 613.
27. Penders, B., Horstman, K. and Vos, R. 2008. Walking the line between lab and computation: The moist zone. Bioscience, 58 (8), 747-55.
28. Powell, A., O’Malley, M., Müller-Wille, S., Calvert, J. and Dupré, J. 2007. Disciplinary baptisms: A comparison of the naming stories of genetics, molecular biology, genomics and systems biology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 29, 5-32.
29. Sayer, A. 2000. For postdisciplinary studies: Sociology and the curse of disciplinary parochialism and imperialism, in For Sociology: Legacies and Prospects, edited by J. Eldridge. J. MacInnes, S. Scott, C. Warhurst and A. Witz. Durham: The Sociology Press, 83-91.
30. Stephens, N., Atkinson, P. and Glasner, P. 2008. The UK Stem Cell Bank as performative architecture. New Genetics and Society, 27, 87-89.
31. Strathern, M. 2005. Anthropology and interdisciplinarity. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 4, 125-35.
32. Strathern, M. 2006. A community of critics?: thoughts on new knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 12, 191-209.
33. Strauss, A. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory(second edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
35. Tait, J. and Lyall, C. 2007. Short Guide to Developing Interdisciplinary Research Proposals. ISSTI Briefing Note (Number 1) March 2007. Available at: http://www.genomicsnetwork.ac.uk/media/ISSTI_Briefing_note_1_developing_ID_proposals.pdf [accessed: 29th November 2009].
36. Thompson Klein, J. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University.
37. Thrift, N. 2006. Re-inventing invention: New tendencies in capitalist commodification. Economy and Society, 35, 279-306.
38. Tomlinson, S. 2000. The research assessment exercise and medical research. British Medical Journal, 320, 636-9.
39. Vermeulen, N. 2009. Supersizing Science. On Building Large-scale Research Projects in Biology. Maastricht: Maastricht University Press.
40. Wenger, E. 2000. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7, (2), 225-46.