An empirical research on management innovation of high-technology manufacturers

Advances in Mechanical Engineering

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1-14

  Huang, Po Yu ^a   Wu, Tian Sheng ^a   Chen, Li Jia ^a   Saito, Riga ^a   Yu, Chih Lang ^a   Huang, Chih Yao ^a   Tsai, Sang Bing ^a,b   Xue, You Zhi ^a   Chen, Quan ^b   Chen, Chang Bin ^b   Wang, Jiang Tao ^b   Tang, Ling ^b  

^a NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

decision making; decision making trial and evaluation laboratory; fuzzy logic; high technology manufacturers; Management innovation; simultaneous importance performance analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938511071     PISSN: 16878132     EISSN: 16878140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1687814015593679     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Peeters C, Massini S, Lewin AY,. Sources of variation in the efficiency of adopting management innovation: the role of absorptive capacity routines, managerial attention and organizational legitimacy. Organ Stud 2014; 35: 1343-1371.
2. Meuer J,. Archetypes of inter-firm relations in the implementation of management innovation: a set-theoretic study in China's biopharmaceutical industry. Organ Stud 2014; 35: 121-145.
3. Drucker PF,. Innovation and entrepreneurship practice and principles: the practice of innovation. New York: Harper & Row, 1985.
4. Burns AC,. Generating marketing strategy priorities based on relative competitive position. J Consum Mark 1986; 3: 49-56.
5. Porter ME,. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press, 1985.
6. Gabus A, Fontela E,. Perceptions of the world problematique: communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility. DEMATEL report no. 1, 1973. Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Center.
7. Kenichi F, Yoshihiro N,. Study on function and failure analysis of snow melting machines. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng C 2002; 68: 3447-3455.
8. Stata R,. Organizational learning-the key to management innovation. Sloan Manag Rev 1989; 6: 56-58.
9. Mol MJ, Birkinshaw J,. The role of external involvement in the creation of management innovations. Organ Stud 2014; 35: 1287-1312.
10. Chang X,. On modern enterprise innovation: a study of innovation on China's enterprise system. Tianjin, China: Tianjin People's Press, 1994.
11. Mingjie R,. Management innovation of modern enterprise (Modern enterprise system series). Shanghai, China: Shanghai Yiwen Press, 1994.
12. Li D, Zhang R,. Evaluation of innovation capability of enterprises. Commer Res 2009; 8: 8-10.
13. Burgelman R, Maidigue MA, Wheel WSC,. Strategic management of technology and innovation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
14. Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Sirmon DG,. A model of strategic entrepreneurship: the construct and its dimensions. J Manag 2001; 22: 479-491.
15. Wang J,. Evaluation system analysis of enterprise management innovation ability. J Beijing Inst Econ Manag 2006; 21: 38-43.
16. Shao G, Liu M,. Study on enterprise innovation capability evaluation system. Bus Econ 2009; 2: 28-49.
17. Lin R, Peng W,. Perspectives on enterprise innovation theories and their significance in appraising the enterprise innovation ability. Sci Sci Manag 2009; 11: 118-121.
18. Fu X, Du L,. Research of management innovation capability assessment model. Sci Technol Prog Policy 2012; 29: 117-121.
19. Samsona D, Gloeta M,. Innovation capability in Australian manufacturing organisations: an exploratory study. Int J Prod Res 2014; 52: 6448-6466.
20. Song W, Ming X, Han Y,. An integrative framework for innovation management of product-service system. Int J Prod Res. Epub ahead of print 14 July 2014. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2014.932929.
21. Dolinsky AL,. Considering the competition in strategy development: an extension of importance-performance analysis. J Health Care Market 1991; 11: 31-37.
22. Yavas U, Shemwell D,. Analyzing a bank's competitive position and appropriate strategy. J Retail Bank Serv 1997; 19: 43-51.
23. Matzler K, Bailom F, Hinterhuber HH,. The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the important-performance analysis. Ind Market Manag 2004; 33: 271-277.
24. Bei LT, Shang CF,. Building marketing strategies for state-owned enterprises against private ones based on the perspectives of consumer satisfaction and service quality. J Retail Consum Serv 2006; 13: 1-13.
25. Lee YC, Hsieh YF,. Modifying IPA with DEMATEL composite importance. In: 2011 international conference on fuzzy system and neural computing, Hongkong, China, 2011, pp. 89-92.
26. Tsai SB, Lee YC, Wu CH,. Examining how manufacturing corporations win orders. S Afr J Ind Eng 2013; 24: 112-124.
27. Lee YC, Li ML, Yen TM,. Analysis of adopting an integrated decision making trial and evaluation laboratory on a technology acceptance model. Expert Syst Appl 2010; 37: 1745-1754.
28. Gao GG, Xiong K, Shang L,. Bit-plane image coding scheme based on compressed sensing. Appl Math Inf Sci 2012; 6: 721-727.
29. Tsai SB, Xue YZ, Huang PY,. Establishing a criteria system for green production. Proc IME B J Eng Manuf. Epub ahead of print 24 June 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0954405414535923.
30. Guo WF, Zhou J, Yu CL,. Evaluating the green corporate social responsibility of manufacturing corporations from a green industry law perspective. Int J Prod Res 2015; 53: 665-674.
31. Tsai SB, Saito R, Lin YC,. Discussing measurement criteria and competitive strategies of green suppliers from a green law perspective. Proc IME B J Eng Manuf 2015; 229: 135-145.
32. Wu WW, Lee YT,. Developing global managers' competencies using fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Syst Appl 2007; 32: 499-507.
33. Kim YH,. Study on impact mechanism for beef cattle farming and importance of evaluating agricultural information in Korea using DEMATEL, PCA and AHP. Agric Inf Res 2006; 15: 267-280.
34. Lin CJ, Wu WW,. A causal analytical method for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 2008; 34: 205-213.
35. Wang W, Zhao Q, Guo R,. Hybrid approach based on grey correlation analysis and fuzzy comprehensive judgment for evaluating service quality of passenger train. Adv Mech Eng 2015; 7: 195496.
36. Tzeng GH, Chiang CH, Li CW,. Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst Appl 2007; 32: 1028-1044.