Diagnosis of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer on prostate MRI: Impact of second-opinion readings by subspecialized genitourinary oncologic radiologists

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 205, Issue 1, 2015, Pages W73-W78

  Wibmer, Andreas ^a   Vargas, Hebert Alberto ^a   Donahue, Timothy F ^a   Zheng, Junting ^a   Moskowitz, Chaya ^a   Eastham, James ^a   Sala, Evis ^a   Hricak, Hedvig ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Extracapsular tumor extension of prostate cancer; MRI; Second opinion readings; Second opinion reinterpretation; Subspecialization

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER GRADING; CANCER HORMONE THERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UROGENITAL TRACT CANCER; UROLOGIST; BIOPSY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PROCEDURES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY; TUMOR INVASION;

AGED; BIOPSY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84938508437     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13600     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer, version 2. Fort Washington, PA: NCCN, 2014
2. Turkbey B, Mani H, Aras O, et al. Prostate cancer: can multiparametric MR imaging help identify patients who are candidates for active surveillance? Radiology 2013; 268:144-152
3. Vargas HA, Akin O, Afaq A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 2012; 188:1732-1738
4. van den Bergh RC, Ahmed HU, Bangma CH, Cooperberg MR, Villers A, Parker CC. Novel tools to improve patient selection and monitoring on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2014; 65:1023-1031
5. Hricak H, Wang L, Wei DC, et al. The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 2004; 100:2655-2663
6. McClure TD, Margolis DJ, Reiter RE, et al. Use of MR imaging to determine preservation of the neurovascular bundles at robotic-assisted laparoscop-ic prostatectomy. Radiology 2012; 262:874-883
7. Tanaka K, Shigemura K, Muramaki M, Takahashi S, Miyake H, Fujisawa M. Efficacy of using three-tesla magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of capsule invasion for decision-making about neurovascular bundle preservation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Korean J Urol 2013; 54:437-441
8. Dinkla AM, Pieters BR, Koedooder K, et al. Improved tumour control probability with MRIbased prostate brachytherapy treatment planning. Acta Oncol 2013; 52:658-665
9. DiPiro PJ, vanSonnenberg E, Tumeh SS, Ros PR. Volume and impact of second-opinion consultations by radiologists at a tertiary care cancer center: data. Acad Radiol 2002; 9:1430-1433
10. Akin O, Riedl CC, Ishill NM, Moskowitz CS, Zhang J, Hricak H. Interactive dedicated training curriculum improves accuracy in the interpretation of MR imaging of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:995-1002
11. Fütterer JJ, Engelbrecht MR, Huisman HJ, et al. Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrastenhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers. Radiology 2005; 237:541-549
12. Mullerad M, Hricak H, Wang L, Chen HN, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology 2004; 232:140-146
13. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44:837-845
14. Lista F, Gimbernat H, Caceres F, Rodriguez-Barbero JM, Castillo E, Angulo JC. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy. Actas Urol Esp 2014; 38:290-297
15. Xylinas E, Yates DR, Renard-Penna R, et al. Role of pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging in staging of prostate cancer specifically in patients diagnosed with clinically locally advanced tumours by digital rectal examination. World J Urol 2013; 31:881-886
16. Soylu FN, Peng Y, Jiang Y, et al. Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging. Radiology 2013; 267:797-806
17. Labanaris AP, Zugor V, Takriti S, et al. The role of conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision of whether to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2009; 43:25-31
18. Eakins C, Ellis WD, Pruthi S, et al. Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications. AJR 2012; 199:916-920
19. Zan E, Yousem DM, Carone M, Lewin JS. Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology. Radiology 2010; 255:135-141
20. Dudley RA, Hricak H, Scheidler J, et al. Shared patient analysis: a method to assess the clinical benefits of patient referrals. Med Care 2001; 39:1182-1187