Safety impact of pavement conditions

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2455, Issue , 2014, Pages 77-88

  Li, Yingfeng ^a   Huang, Jie ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGHWAY ACCIDENTS; HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; PAVEMENTS;

CONDITION; CRASH RATE; KEY FACTORS; PAVEMENT CONDITION; PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RECORD INFORMATION; RIDE QUALITY; SAFETY IMPACT; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONS; TRAFFIC CRASHES;

DETERIORATION;

EID: 84938501227     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2455-09     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Nakatsuji, T., T. Kaku, T. Fujiwara, Y. Hagiwara, and Y. Onodera. Dynamic Behavior of Vehicle on a Rutted Road. In Surface Characteristics of Roadways: International Research and Technologies, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 1990, pp. 198-210.
2. Burns, J. C. Roughness and Roadway Safety. In Transportation Research Record 836. TRB, National Research Council. Washington, D.C., 1981, pp. 8-14.
3. Chandra, S. Effect of Road Roughness on Capacity of Two-Lane Roads. Journal of Transportation Engineering. Vol. 130, No. 3, 2004, pp. 360-354.
4. Chan,C.Y, B. Huang, X. Yan, and S. Richards. Investigating Effects of Asphalt Pavement Conditions on Traffic Accidents in Tennessee Based on the Pavement Management System (PMS). Journal of Advanced Transportation. Vol. 44, No. 3,2010, pp. 150-161.
5. Drakopoulos, A., T.H. Wenzel, S.F. Shoher, and R.B. Schmiedlin. Crash Experience on Tined and Continuously Ground Portland Cement Concrete Pavements. In Transportation Research Record 1639, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1998, pp. 140-146.
6. Li, Y, C. Liu, and L. Ding. Impact of Pavement Conditions on Crash Severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 59,2013, pp. 339-406.
7. Pavement Management Information System (PMIS) User's Manual. Volume 1-Requirements and Concepts. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 1997.
8. Wu, Z., J.L. Groeger, A.L. Simpson, and R.G. Hicks. Performance Evaluation of Various Rehabilitation and Preservation Treatments. Report FHWA-HIF-10-020. Office of Asset Management, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
9. Westfall, P.H., R. D. Tobias, D. Rom, R. D. Wolfinger, and Y. Hochberg. Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using the SAS System. SAS Institute Inc., Arlington, Va., 1999.
10. SAS/STAT9.2 User's Guide-Multiple Comparisons. SAS Institute Inc., Arlington, Va., 2013.