Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Management at Bedside: A Single-Center Pilot Study

Neurocritical Care

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 92-102

  Dias, Celeste ^a   Silva, Maria João ^b   Pereira, Eduarda ^a   Monteiro, Elisabete ^a   Maia, Isabel ^a   Barbosa, Silvina ^a   Silva, Sofia ^a   Honrado, Teresa ^a   Cerejo, António ^a   Aries, Marcel J H ^c   Smielewski, Peter ^d   Paiva, José Artur ^a   Czosnyka, Marek ^d  

^a HOSPITAL DE SÃO JOÃO   (Portugal)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^d ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cerebral perfusion pressure; Cerebrovascular pressure reactivity; Multimodal brain monitoring; Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; MANNITOL; MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOREGULATION; BLOOD VESSEL REACTIVITY; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN BLOOD VESSEL; BRAIN PERFUSION; BRAIN TISSUE; CEREBRAL PERFUSION PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROMONITORING; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXIMETRY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT MONITORING; PERFUSION PRESSURE; PILOT STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TISSUE OXYGENATION; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; BLOOD PRESSURE; BRAIN CIRCULATION; BRAIN INJURIES; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HOMEOSTASIS; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; STANDARDS;

ADULT; BLOOD PRESSURE; BRAIN INJURIES; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 84938421510     PISSN: 15416933     EISSN: 15560961     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-014-0103-8     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Stahel PF, Smith WR, Moore EE. Hypoxia and hypotension, the “lethal duo” in traumatic brain injury: implications for prehospital care. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:402–4.
2. Jeremitsky E, Omert L, Dunham CM, Protetch J, Rodriguez A. Harbingers of poor outcome the day after severe brain injury: hypothermia, hypoxia, and hypoperfusion. J Trauma. 2003;54:312–9.
3. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VIII. Intracranial pressure thresholds. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(Suppl 1):S55–8.
4. Trauma F, American Association of Neurological S, Congress of Neurological S, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. IX. Cerebral perfusion thresholds. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(Suppl 1):S59–64.
5. Rosner MJ, Rosner SD, Johnson AH. Cerebral perfusion pressure: management protocol and clinical results. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:949–62.
6. Grande PO. The Lund concept for the treatment of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011;23:358–62.
7. Saatman KE, Duhaime AC, Bullock R, et al. Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25:719–38.
8. Chesnut RM. Intracranial pressure monitoring: headstone or a new head start. The BEST TRIP trial in perspective. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:771–4.
9. Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, et al. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2471–81.
10. Tzeng YC, Ainslie PN. Blood pressure regulation IX: cerebral autoregulation under blood pressure challenges. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013. doi:10.1007/s00421-013-2667-y.
11. Paulson OB, Strandgaard S, Edvinsson L. Cerebral autoregulation. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 1990;2:161–92.
12. Czosnyka M, Brady K, Reinhard M, Smielewski P, Steiner LA. Monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation: facts, myths, and missing links. Neurocrit Care. 2009;10:373–86.
13. Rangel-Castilla L, Gasco J, Nauta HJ, Okonkwo DO, Robertson CS. Cerebral pressure autoregulation in traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25:E7.
14. Zweifel C, Dias C, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M. Continuous time-domain monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in neurocritical care. Med Eng Phys. 2014;36:638–45.
15. Steiner LA, Czosnyka M, Piechnik SK, et al. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:733–8.
16. Zweifel C, Lavinio A, Steiner LA, et al. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in patients with head injury. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25:E2.
17. Aries MJ, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, et al. Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2456–63.
18. Rasulo FA, Girardini A, Lavinio A, et al. Are optimal cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebrovascular autoregulation related to long-term outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2012;24:3–8.
19. Diedler J, Sykora M, Rupp A, et al. Impaired cerebral vasomotor activity in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2009;40:815–9.
20. Jaeger M, Schuhmann MU, Soehle M, Meixensberger J. Continuous assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation after traumatic brain injury using brain tissue oxygen pressure reactivity. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1783–8.
21. Jaeger M, Schuhmann MU, Soehle M, Nagel C, Meixensberger J. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation after subarachnoid hemorrhage by brain tissue oxygen pressure reactivity and its relation to delayed cerebral infarction. Stroke. 2007;38:981–6.
22. Maas AI, Hukkelhoven CW, Marshall LF, Steyerberg EW. Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:1173–82 discussion -82.
23. Jennett B. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. The Lancet. 1975;305:480–4.
24. Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Steiner L, Belestri M, Piechnik S, Pickard JD. ICM+: software for on-line analysis of bedside monitoring data after severe head trauma. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;95:43–9.
25. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Laing RJ, Menon D, Pickard JD. Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:11–7 discussion 7-9.
26. Sorrentino E, Diedler J, Kasprowicz M, et al. Critical thresholds for cerebrovascular reactivity after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16:258–66.
27. Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:1338–44.
28. Rao V, Klepstad P, Losvik OK, Solheim O. Confusion with cerebral perfusion pressure in a literature review of current guidelines and survey of clinical practise. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21:78.
29. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. IX. Cerebral perfusion thresholds. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(Suppl 1):S59–64.
30. Stocchetti N, Maas AI. Traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2121–30.
31. Team RDC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012.
32. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;8476:307–10.
33. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies–with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care. 2009;13:201.
34. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Piechnik S, Laing R, Pickard JD. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure-reactivity in head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1998;71:74–7.
35. Lang EW, Lagopoulos J, Griffith J, et al. Cerebral vasomotor reactivity testing in head injury: the link between pressure and flow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74:1053–9.
36. Budohoski KP, Czosnyka M, de Riva N, et al. The relationship between cerebral blood flow autoregulation and cerebrovascular pressure reactivity after traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:652–60 discussion 60-1.
37. Zweifel C, Castellani G, Czosnyka M, et al. Noninvasive monitoring of cerebrovascular reactivity with near infrared spectroscopy in head-injured patients. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:1951–8.
38. Weerakkody RA, Czosnyka M, Zweifel C, et al. Slow vasogenic fluctuations of intracranial pressure and cerebral near infrared spectroscopy—an observational study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152:1763–9.
39. Steiner LA, Pfister D, Strebel SP, Radolovich D, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M. Near-infrared spectroscopy can monitor dynamic cerebral autoregulation in adults. Neurocrit Care. 2009;10:122–8.
40. Brady KM, Lee JK, Kibler KK, et al. Continuous time-domain analysis of cerebrovascular autoregulation using near-infrared spectroscopy. Stroke. 2007;38:2818–25.
41. Brady K, Joshi B, Zweifel C, et al. Real-time continuous monitoring of cerebral blood flow autoregulation using near-infrared spectroscopy in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Stroke. 2010;41:1951–6.
42. Diedler J, Zweifel C, Budohoski KP, et al. The limitations of near-infrared spectroscopy to assess cerebrovascular reactivity: the role of slow frequency oscillations. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:849–57.
43. Lazaridis C, Smielewski P, Steiner LA, et al. Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: are we ready for it? Neurol Res. 2013;35:138–48.