Use of spatiotemporal constraints to quantify Transit accessibility: Case study of potential transit-oriented development in West Valley City, Utah

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2417, Issue , 2014, Pages 130-138

  Tasic, Ivana ^a   Zhou, Xuesong ^b   Zlatkovic, Milan ^a  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^b Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE-STUDIES; MODE CHOICE; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; PUBLIC TRANSIT; SPATIAL CONSTRAINTS; SPATIO-TEMPORAL CONSTRAINTS; TEMPORAL CONSTRAINTS; TIME FRAME; TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

BUDGET CONTROL;

EID: 84938382298     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2417-14     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Moniruzzaman, M., and A. Páez. Accessibility to Transit, by Transit, and Mode Share: Application of a Logistic Model with Spatial Filters. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 24, 2012, pp. 198-205.
2. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Washington, D. C., 2003.
3. Handy, S., and D. A. Niemeier. Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 29, No. 7, 1997, pp. 1175-1194.
4. Farber, S., and A. Páez. Running to Stay in Place: The Time-Use Implications of Automobile-Oriented Land-Use and Travel. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 19, 2011, pp. 782-793.
5. Taylor, B. D., D. Miller, H. Iseki, and C. Fink. Nature and/or Nurture? Analyzing the Determinants of Transit Ridership across U. S. Urbanized Areas. Transportation Research Part A. 2009, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 60-77.
6. Cervero, R., and G. B. Arrington. Vehicle Trip Reduction Impacts of Transit-Oriented Housing. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 11, 2008.
7. Arrington, G. B. New Transit Cooperative Research Program Research Confirms Transit-Oriented Developments Produce Fewer Auto Trips. ITE Journal, 2009, pp. 26-29.
8. Belzer, D., and G. Autler. Transit Oriented Development: Moving from Rhetoric to Reality. Prepared for the Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy and the Great American Station Foundation, Washington, D. C., 2002.
9. Handy, S., and K. Clifton. Evaluating Neighborhood Accessibility: Issues and Methods Using Geographic Information Systems. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Sept.-Dec. 2001, pp. 68-78.
10. Litman, T. Measuring Transportation-Traffic, Mobility and Accessibility. ITE Journal, Vol. 73, No. 10, 2003. pp. 28-32.
11. Black, J., and M. Conroy. Accessibility Measures and the Social Evaluation of Urban Structure. Environment and Planning, Vol. 9, No. 9, 1977, pp. 1013-1031.
12. Hansen. W. G. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 35, 1959, pp. 73-76.
13. Ben-Akiva, M. E., and S. R. Lerman. Disaggregate Travel and Mobility Choice Models and Measures of Accessibility. In Behavioral Travel Modelling (DA. Hensher and PR. Storper, eds.), London, 1979 pp. 654-679.
14. El-Geneidy, A., and D. M. Levinson. Access to Destinations: Development of Accessibility Measures. Report No. 2006-16. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, 2006.
15. Wu. J. H., and H. J. Miller. Computational Tools for Measuring Space Time Accessibility Within Dynamic Flow Transportation Networks. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 4, No. 2/3, 2001.
16. Miller, H. J. Measuring Space Time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures Geographical Analysis, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1999.
17. Kwan, M.-P. Space-Time and Integral Measures of Individual Accessibility: A Comparative Analysis Using a Point-Based Framework Geographical Analysis. Vol. 30, No. 3, 1998.
18. Miller, H. J. Modeling Accessibility Using Space Time Prism Concepts within Geographical Information Systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 287-301.
19. Coffel, K., J. Parks, C. Sender, P. Ryus, D. Sampson, C. Kachadoorian, H. S. Levinson, and J. Schofer. TCRP Report 153: Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2012.
20. Kittelson & Associates, Inc., Urbitran, Inc., LKC Consulting Services, Inc., MORPACE International, Inc., Queensland University of Technology, and Yuko Nakanishi. TCRP Report 88: A Guidebook for Developing Transit Performance-Measurement System. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2003.
21. AASHTO Guide for Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities, 1st ed. AASHTO, Washington, DC, 2004.
22. Google Transit Feed Data, https://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs/reference?hl=fr-FR. Accessed June 15, 2013.