Logging operations in pine stands in Belgium with additional harvest of woody biomass: Yield, economics, and energy balance

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 45, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 987-997

  Vangansbeke, P ^a   Osselaere, J ^a   Van Dael, M ^b,c   De Frenne, P ^a   Gruwez, R ^a   Pelkmans, L ^b   Gorissen, L ^b   Verheyen, K ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b FLEMISH INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH VITO   (Belgium)

^c HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Economic analysis; Energy balance; Harvest strategies; Whole tree harvesting; Woody biomass

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY BALANCE; HARVESTING; PROFITABILITY; ROADSIDES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WOOD PRODUCTS;

HARVESTING COSTS; LIMITED ENERGIES; LOGGING OPERATIONS; PINUS NIGRA ARNOLD; PRODUCTION SECTOR; SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES; WHOLE TREE HARVESTING; WOODY BIOMASS;

FORESTRY;

CLEARCUTTING; COST ANALYSIS; ENERGY BALANCE; HARVESTING; LOGGING (TIMBER); PROFITABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STAND STRUCTURE; THINNING; WOODY DEBRIS;

BIOMASS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; HARVESTING; TREES;

BELGIUM;

PINUS NIGRA;

EID: 84938381580     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: 12086037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0521     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adebayo, A.B., Han, H.S., and Johnson, L. 2007. Productivity and cost of cut-tolength and whole-tree harvesting in a mixed-conifer stand. For. Prod. J. 57(6): 59–69.
2. Bailey, A.P., Basford, W.D., Penlington, N., Park, J.R., Keatinge, J.D.H., Rehman, T., Tranter, R.B., and Yates, C.M. 2003. A comparison of energy use in conventional and integrated arable farming systems in the UK. Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 97(1–3): 241–253. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00115-4.
3. Berger, A.L., Palik, B., D'Amato, A.W., Fraver, S., Bradford, J.B., Nislow, K., King, D., and Brooks, R.T. 2013. Ecological impacts of energy-wood harvests: lessons from whole-tree harvesting and natural disturbance. J. For. 111(2): 139–153. doi:10.5849/jof.12-020.
4. Conrad, J.L., IV, Bolding, M.C., Aust, W.M., Smith, R.L., and Horcher, A. 2013. Harvesting productivity and costs when utilizing energywood from pine plantations of the southern Coastal Plain U.S.A. Biomass Bioenergy, 52: 85–95. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.038.
5. Dirkse, G.M., Daamen, W.P., Schoonderwoerd, H., Japink, M., van Jole, M., van Moorsel, R., Stouthamer, W.J., and Vocks, M. 2007. Measurement of forest functions 2001–2005. Fifth Dutch National Forest Inventory. [In Dutch.] Directie Kennis, Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, Ede, the Netherlands.
6. do Canto, J.L., Klepac, J., Rummer, B., Savoie, P., and Seixas, F. 2011. Evaluation of two round baling systems for harvesting understory biomass. Biomass Bioenergy, 35(5): 2163–2170. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.006.
7. Dwivedi, P., and Khanna, M. 2014. Wood-based bioenergy products — land or energy efficient? Can. J. For. Res. 44(10): 1187–1195. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2014-0210.
8. Edwards, R., Mulligan, D., Giuntolo, J., Agostini, A., Boulamanti, A., Koeble, R., Marelli, L., Moro, A., and Padella, M. 2012. Assessing GHG default emissions from biofuels in EU legislation. Review of input database to calculate “Default GHG emissions”, following expert consultation, 22–23 November 2011, Ispra (Italy). Institute for Energy and Transport, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
9. Eurostat. 2011. Forestry in the EU and the world: a statistical portrait. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
10. Fleming, R.L., Leblanc, J.D., Hazlett, P.W., Weldon, T., Irwin, R., and Mossa, D.S. 2014. Effects of biomass harvest intensity and soil disturbance on jack pine stand productivity: 15-year results. Can. J. For. Res. 44(12): 1566–1574. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2014-0008.
11. Flemish Government. 2004. Decision of 5 March 2004 of the Flemish government concerning promotion of energy generation from renewable sources [In Dutch.] Flemish Government, Brussels, Belgium.
12. Forest and Green Areas Division (FGAD). 2001. The forest inventory of the Flemish Region. Results of the first inventory 1997–1999. [In Dutch.] Ministry of the Flemish Community, Brussels, Belgium.
13. Francescato, V., Antonini, E., Bergomi, L., Metschina, C., Schnedl, C., Krajnc, N., Koscik, K., Gradziuk, P., Nocentini, G., and Stranieri, S. 2008. Wood fuels fandbook: production, quality requirements, trading. AIEL–Italian Agriforestry Energy Association, Legnaro, Italy.
14. Helmisaari, H.S., Kaarakka, L., and Olsson, B.A. 2014. Increased utilization of different tree parts for energy purposes in the Nordic countries. Scand. J. For. Res. 29(4): 312–322. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.926097.
15. Hermy, M., Van Der Veken, S., Van Calster, H., and Plue, J. 2008. Forest ecosystem assessment, changes in biodiversity and climate change in a densely populated region (Flanders, Belgium). Plant Biosyst. 142(3): 623–629. doi:10.1080/11263500802411023.
16. Lehtimaki, J., and Nurmi, J. 2011. Energy wood harvesting productivity of three harvesting methods in first thinning of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Biomass Bioenergy, 35(8): 3383–3388. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.09.012.
17. Mantau, U., Saal, U., Prins, K., Steierer, F., Lindner, M., Verkerk, H., Eggers, J., Leek, N., Oldenburger, J., and Asikainen, A. 2010. Real potential for changes in growth and use of EU forests. Final report, EUwood. Hamburg, Germany.
18. Marchi, E., Magagnotti, N., Berretti, L., Neri, F., and Spinelli, R. 2011. Comparing terrain and roadside chipping in Mediterranean pine salvage cuts. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 32(2): 587–598.
19. Mederski, P.S. 2006. A comparison of harvesting productivity and costs in thinning operations with and without midfield. For. Ecol. Manage. 224(3): 286–296. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.042.
20. Mikkola, H.J., and Ahokas, J. 2010. Indirect energy input of agricultural machinery in bioenergy production. Renewable Energy, 35(1): 23–28. doi:10.1016/j. renene.2009.05.010.
21. Miyata, E.S. 1980. Determining fixed and operating costs of logging equipment. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-55.
22. Nati, C., Spinelli, R., and Fabbri, P. 2010. Wood chips size distribution in relation to blade wear and screen use. Biomass Bioenergy, 34(5): 583–587. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.005.
23. Njakou Djomo, S., El Kasmioui, O., and Ceulemans, R. 2011. Energy and greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy production from poplar and willow: a review. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 3(3): 181–197. doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01073.x.
24. Njakou Djomo, S., El Kasmioui, O., De Groote, T., Broeckx, L.S., Verlinden, M.S., Berhongaray, G., Fichot, R., Zona, D., Dillen, S.Y., King, J.S., Janssens, I.A., and Ceulemans, R. 2013. Energy and climate benefits of bioelectricity from lowinput short rotation woody crops on agricultural land over a two-year rotation. Appl. Energy, 111: 862–870. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.017.
25. Olsson, B.A., Bengtsson, J., and Lundkvist, H. 1996. Effects of different forest harvest intensities on the pools of exchangeable cations in coniferous forest soils. For. Ecol. Manage. 84(1–3): 135–147. doi:10.1016/0378-1127(96)03730-9.
26. Osselaere, J., and Vangansbeke, P. 2013. Techniques and strategies for harvest of woody biomass: results of the terrain experiments executed in Bosland. [In Dutch.] ANB-Inverde, Brussels, Belgium.
27. Ovaskainen, H., Palander, T., Tikkanen, L., Hirvonen, H., and Ronkainen, P. 2011. Productivity of different working techniques in thinning and clear cutting in a harvester simulator. Baltic Forestry, 17(2): 288–298.
28. Panichelli, L., and Gnansounou, E. 2008. GIS-based approach for defining bioenergy facilities location: a case study in northern Spain based on marginal delivery costs and resources competition between facilities. Biomass Bioenergy, 32(4): 289–300. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.10.008.
29. Phillips, T., and Watmough, S.A. 2012. A nutrient budget for a selection harvest: implications for long-term sustainability. Can. J. For. Res. 42(12): 2064–2077. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2012-0224.
30. Pihlainen, S., Tahvonen, O., Niinimäki, S. 2014. The economics of timber and bioenergy production and carbon storage in Scots pine stands. Can. J. For. Res. 44(9): 1091–1102. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2013-0475.
31. Pussinen, A., Karjalainen, T., Makipaa, R., Valsta, L., and Kellomaki, S. 2002. Forest carbon sequestration and harvests in Scots pine stand under different climate and nitrogen deposition scenarios. For. Ecol. Manage. 158(1–3): 103–115. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00675-7.
32. R Core Team 2013. R version 3.0.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www.r-project.org.
33. Räisänen, T., and Nurmi, J. 2014. Impacts of bucking and delimbing alternatives on pulpwood and energy wood yields in young thinning stands in Finland. Scand. J. For. Res. 29(3): 243–251. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.903991.
34. Riffell, S., Verschuyl, J., Miller, D., and Wigley, T.B. 2011. Biofuel harvests, coarse woody debris, and biodiversity — a meta-analysis. For. Ecol. Manage. 261(4): 878–887. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.021.
35. Schulze, E.D., Korner, C.I., Law, B.E., Haberl, H., and Luyssaert, S. 2012. Largescale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 4(6): 611–616. doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01169.x.
36. Sikkema, R., Junginger, M., Pichler, W., Hayes, S., and Faaij, A.P.C. 2010. The international logistics of wood pellets for heating and power production in Europe: costs, energy-input and greenhouse gas balances of pellet consumption in Italy, Sweden and the Netherlands. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 4(2): 132–153. doi:10.1002/bbb.208.
37. Spinelli, R., and Hartsough, B. 2001. A survey of Italian chipping operations. Biomass Bioenergy, 21(6): 433–444. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00050-2.
38. Spinelli, R., and Magagnotti, N. 2010. Comparison of two harvesting systems for the production of forest biomass from the thinning of Picea abies plantations. Scand. J. For. Res. 25(1): 69–77. doi:10.1080/02827580903505194.
39. Spinelli, R., and Visser, R.J.M. 2009. Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. Biomass Bioenergy, 33(3): 429–433. doi:10.1016/j. biombioe.2008.08.003.
40. Spinelli, R., Nati, C., Sozzi, L., Magagnotti, N., and Picchi, G. 2011. Physical characterization of commercial woodchips on the Italian energy market. Fuel, 90(6): 2198–2202. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.02.011.
41. Spinelli, R., Schweier, J., and De Francesco, F. 2012. Harvesting techniques for non-industrial biomass plantations. Biosyst. Eng. 113(4): 319–324. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.09.008.
42. Spinelli, R., Di Gironimo, G., Esposito, G., and Magagnotti, N. 2014. Alternative supply chains for logging residues under access constraints. Scand. J. For. Res. 29(3): 266–274. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.896939.
43. United Nations. 1987. UN General Assembly Resolution 42/187. In Report of the World Commission on Environment, United Nations.
44. Van Dael, M., Van Passel, S., Pelkmans, L., Guisson, R., Reumermann, P., Luzardo, N.M., Witters, N., and Broeze, J. 2013. A techno-economic evaluation of a biomass energy conversion park. Appl. Energy, 104: 611–622. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.071.
45. Van Gossum, P., Arts, B., De Wulf, R., and Verheyen, K. 2011. An institutional evaluation of sustainable forest management in Flanders. Land Use Policy, 28(1): 110–123. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.005.
46. Vangansbeke, P., Gorissen, L., Nevens, F., and Verheyen, K. 2015. Towards coownership in forest management: Analysis of a pioneering case “Bosland” (Flanders, Belgium) through transition lenses. Forest Policy and Economics, 50: 98–109. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.07.006.
47. Visser, R., and Spinelli, R. 2012. Determining the shape of the productivity function for mechanized felling and felling-processing. J. For. Res. 17(5): 397–402. doi:10.1007/s10310-011-0313-2.
48. Wall, A. 2012. Risk analysis of effects of whole-tree harvesting on site productivity. For. Ecol. Manage. 282: 175–184. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.012.
49. Walmsley, J.D., Jones, D.L., Reynolds, B., Price, M.H., and Healey, J.R. 2009. Whole tree harvesting can reduce second rotation forest productivity. For. Ecol. Manage. 257(3): 1104–1111. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.015.
50. Walsh, D., and Strandgard, M. 2014. Productivity and cost of harvesting a stemwood biomass product from integrated cut-to-length harvest operations in Australian Pinus radiata plantations. Biomass Bioenergy, 66: 93–102. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.017.