Flagrant Misconduct of Reviewers and Editor: A Case Study

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn , Issue 4, 2015, Pages 829-835

  Kotchoubey, Boris ^a   Bütof, Sarah ^b   Sitaram, Ranganatha ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c University of Florida   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict of interests; Editor; Ethical conduct; Reviewing process

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; HUMAN; PEER REVIEW; PERSONNEL; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 84938270223     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 14715546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9583-3     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,57, 289–300.
2. Boly, M., Phillips, C., Tshibanda, L., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Schabus, M., Dang-Vu, T. T., et al. (2008). Intrinsic brain activity in altered states of consciousness: How conscious is the default mode of brain function? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1129, 119–129.
3. Boly, M., Tshibanda, L., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Noirhomme, Q., Schnakers, C., Ledoux, D., et al. (2009). Functional connectivity in the default network during resting state is preserved in a vegetative but not in a brain dead patient. Human Brain Mapping,30, 2393–2400.
4. Borkowsky, S. C., & Welsh, M. J. (2000). Ethical practice in the accounting publishing process: Contrasting opinions of authors and editors. Journal of Business Ethics,25, 15–31.
5. Coleman, M. R., Davis, M. H., Rodd, J. M., Robson, T., Ali, A., Owen, A. M., et al. (2009). Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain,132, 2541–2552.
6. Fernandez-Espejo, D., Soddu, A., Cruse, D., Palacios, E. M., Junque, C., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., et al. (2012). A role for the default mode network in the bases of disorders of consciousness. Annals of Neurology,72, 335–343.
7. Kotchoubey, B., Veser, S., Real, R., Herbert, C., Lang, S., & Kübler, A. (2013). Towards a more precise neurophysiological assessment of cognitive functions in patients with disorders of consciousness. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience,31, 473–485.
8. Laureys, S., Boly, M., Schnakers, C., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Bruno, M.-A., Noirhomme, Q., et al. (2008). Revelations from the unconscious: Studying residual brain function in coma and related states. Bulletin et Memoires de l’Academie Royale de Medecine de Belgique,163, 381–390.
9. Myers, D. G. (2012). Social psychology (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Noirhomme, Q., Soddu, A., Lehembre, R., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Boveroux, P., Boly, M., & Laureys, S. (2010). Brain connectivity in pathological and pharmacological coma. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 4, Article 160.
11. Oleinik, A. (2014). Conflict(s) of interest in peer review: Its origins and possible solutions. Science and Engineering Ethics,20, 55–75.
12. Resnik, D. B., Gutierrez-Ford, C., & Peddada, S. (2008). Perception of ethical problems with scientific journal peer review: An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics,14, 305–310.
13. Roth, W.-M. (2002). Editorial power/authorial suffering. Research in Science Education,32, 215–240.
14. Wager, E., Fiack, S., Graf, C., Robinson, A., & Rowlands, I. (2009). Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: Results of an international survey. Journal of Medical Ethics,35, 348–353.