Scientific Opinion on the risk to plant health of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri and Xanthomonas citri pv. aurantifolii for the EU territory

EFSA Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

citrus canker; European Union; pest risk assessment; risk reduction options; Xanthomonas citri pv. aurantifolii; Xanthomonas citri pv. citri

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937976909     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3556     Document Type: Article

References (284)

1. ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation), 2012. Citrus canker found in leaf imports, 2 pp. Available online: www.abc.net.au/news/2012-07-06/citrus-canker-risk-lime-leaves-imported/4114354
2. Agustí M, 2002. Citricultura. Ediciones Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, 422 pp.
3. Ah-You N, Gagnevin L, Grimont PAD, Brisse S, Nesme X, Chiroleu F, Bui Thi Ngoc L, Jouen E, Lefeuvre P, Vernière C and Pruvost O, 2009. Polyphasic characterization of xanthomonads pathogenic to Anacardiaceae and their relatedness to different Xanthomonas species. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 59, 306–318.
4. Alam K and Rolfe J, 2006. Economics of plant disease outbreaks. Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 13, 133–146.
5. Almeida NF, Yan S, Cai R, Clarke CR, Morris CE, Schaad NW, Schuenzel EL, Lacy GH, Sun X, Jones JB, Castillo JA, Bull CT, Leman S, Guttman DS, Setubal JC and Vinatzer BA, 2010. PAMDB, a multilocus sequence typing and analysis database and website for plant-associated microbes. Phytopathology, 100, 208–215.
6. Alvarez AM, 2004. Integrated approaches for detection of plant pathogenic bacteria and diagnosis of bacterial diseases. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 42, 339–366.
7. Alvarez AM, Benedict AA, Mizumoto CY, Pollard LW and Civerolo EL, 1991. Analysis of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri and X. c. citrumelo with monoclonal antibodies. Phytopathology, 81, 857–865.
8. Argov Y and Rössler Y, 1996. Introduction, release and recovery of several exotic natural enemies for biological control of the citrus leafminer, Phyllocnistis citrella, in Israel. Phytoparasitica 24, 33–38.
9. Attard G and Azzopardi E, 2005. An overview of irrigation system performance on the island of Malta. In: Irrigation systems performance. Eds Lamaddalen AN, Lebdi F, Todorovic M and Bogliotti C. CIHEAM, Bari, Italy, 159–166.
10. Aubert B and Vullin G, 1997. Pépinières et plantations d'agrumes. CIRAD Publications, Montpellier, France, 184 pp.
11. Australian Citrus Propagation Association Inc., undated. Australian Citrus Nursery Certification Scheme, Nursery Operators Manual, Version 1.0., 16pp. Available online: www.auscitrus.com.au/pdfs/Australian_Citrus_Nursery_Certification_Scheme_nursery_manual_ver1_0.pdf
12. Australian Government (Interim Inspector General of Biosecurity), 2011. An examination of the performance of the systems that the biosecurity divisions of the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry has in place to manage biosecurity risks along entry pathways-citrus canker. Canberra, Australia, July 2011.
13. Balasundaram D, Burks TF, Bulanon DM, Schubert T and Lee WS, 2009. Spectral reflectance characteristics of citrus canker and other peel conditions of grapefruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 51, 2, 220–226.
14. Balestra GM, Sechler A, Schuenzel E and Schaad NW, 2008. First report of citrus canker caused by Xanthomonas citri in Somalia. Plant Disease, 92, 981.
15. Balogh B, Canteros BI, Stall RE and Jones JB, 2008. Control of citrus canker and citrus bacterial spot with bacteriophages. Plant Disease, 92, 1048–1052.
16. Bassanezi RB, Belasque J Jr and Massari CA, 2008. Current situation, management and economic impact of citrus canker in São Paulo and Minas Gerais, Brazil. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, Villahermosa, Mexico, p. 10.
17. Behlau F, Belasque J Jr, Bergamin Filho A and Leite RP Jr, 2007. Citrus canker incidence and severity on ‘Pera RiO' sweet orange under chemical control and windbreak protection. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 32, 311–317.
18. Behlau F, Belasque J Jr, Bergamin Filho A, Graham JH, Leite RP Jr and Gottwald TR, 2008. Copper sprays and windbreaks for control of citrus canker on young orange trees in southern Brazil. Crop Protection, 27, 807–813.
19. Behlau F, Belasque J Jr, Graham JH and Leite RP Jr, 2010. Effect of frequency of copper applications on control of citrus canker and the yield of young bearing sweet orange trees. Crop Protection, 29, 300–305.
20. Behlau F, Canteros BI, Minsavage GV, Jones JB and Graham JH, 2011a. Molecular characterization of copper resistance genes from Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri and Xanthomonas alfalfae subsp. citrumelonis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77, 4089–4096.
21. Behlau F, Da Silva TG and Belasque J Jr, 2011b. Copper bactericides for control of citrus canker: is there room for improvement? Proceedings of the International Workshop on Citrus Canker, 17–18 November 2011, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil, 44–47.
22. Behlau F, Canteros BI, Jones JB and Graham JH, 2012a. Copper resistance genes from different xanthomonads and citrus epiphytic bacteria confer resistance to Xanthomonas citri subsp citri. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 133, 949–963.
23. Behlau F, Jones JB, Myers ME and Graham JH, 2012b. Monitoring for resistant populations of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri and epiphytic bacteria on citrus trees treated with copper or streptomycin using a new semi-selective medium. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 132, 259–270.
24. Behlau, F, Hong, JC, Jones, JB, and Graham, JH, 2013. Evidence for acquisition of copper resistance genes from different sources in citrus-associated xanthomonads. Phytopathology, 103, 409–418.
25. Belasque J Jr, Parra-Pedrazzoli AL, Neto JR, Yamamoto PT, Chagas MCM, Parra JRP, Vinyard BT and Hartung JS, 2005. Adult citrus leadminers (Phyllocnistis citrella) are not efficient vectors for Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Plant Disease, 89, 590–594.
26. Belasque J Jr, Barbosa, JC, Bergamin Filho, A, and Massari, CA, 2010. Prováveis consequências do abrandamento da metodologia de erradicação do cancro cítrico no Estado de São Paulo. Tropical Plant Pathololgy, 35, 314–317.
27. Bernal-Vicente A, Ros M, Tittarelli F, Intrigliolo F and Pascual JA, 2008. Citrus compost and its water extract for cultivation of melon plants in greenhouse nurseries. Evaluation of nutriactive and biocontrol effects. Bioresource Technology, 99, 8722–8728.
28. Biosecurity Australia, 2009. Final import risk analysis report for fresh unshu mandarin fruit from Shizuoka prefecture in Japan. Biosecurity Australia, Canberra, 256 pp.
29. Biosecurity New Zealand, 2010. Citrus (Citrus), Fortunella (Kumquat) and Poncirus (Trifoliate orange) post entry quarantine testing manual. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Wellington, New Zealand. 59 pp.
30. Bock CH, Parker PE, Cook AZ and Gottwald TR, 2008. Visual rating and the use of image analysis for assessing different symptoms of citrus canker on grapefruit leaves. Plant Disease, 92, 530–541.
31. Bock CH, Cook AZ, Parker PE and Gottwald TR, 2009a. Automated image analysis of the severity of foliar citrus canker symptoms. Plant Disease, 93, 660–665.
32. Bock CH, Parker PE, Cook AZ, Riley T and Gottwald TR, 2009b. Comparison of assessment of citrus canker foliar symptoms by experienced and inexperienced raters. Plant Disease, 93, 412–424.
33. Bock CH, Graham JH, Gottwald TR, Cook AZ and Parker PE, 2010. Wind speed and wind-associated leaf injury affect severity of citrus canker on Swingle citrumelo. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 128, 21–38.
34. Bock CH, Gottwald TR and Parker PE, 2011. Distribution of canker lesions on the surface of diseased grapefruit. Plant Pathology, 60, 986–991.
35. Bock CH, Cook AZ, Parker PE, Gottwald TR and Graham JH, 2012. Short-distance dispersal of splashed bacteria of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri from canker-infected grapefruit tree canopies in turbulent wind. Plant Pathology, 61, 829–836.
36. Bonn G, Taylor E, Riley T, Gottwald T and Schubert T, 2009. Survival of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri on symptomatic fruit under prolonged ambient and cold storage conditions. APS meetings, 2009 Caribbean Division Meeting Abstracts, 16–19 May, 2009, Orlando, Florida (joint meeting with the Florida Pathological Society). Available online: www.apsnet.org/members/divisions/carib/meetings/Pages/CaribbeanMeetingAbstracts2009.aspx
37. Bordas M, Torrents J, Arenas FJ and Hervalejo A, 2012. High density plantation system of the Spanish citrus industry. Acta Horticulturae, 965, 123–130.
38. Broadbent P, Fahy PC, Gillings MR, Bradley JK and Barnes D, 1992. Asiatic citrus canker detected in a pummelo orchard in Northern Australia. Plant Disease, 76, 824–829.
39. Brooks HE, Leeb JW, Cravenc JP, 2003. The spatial distribution of severe thunderstorm and tornado environments from global reanalysis data. Atmospheric Research, 67–68, 73-94.
40. Brugnara EC, Theodoro GF, Nesi CN, Verona LAF and Maringoni AC, 2012. Damage caused by citrus canker on Valencia sweet orange yield. IDESIA, 30, 109–113.
41. Brunings AM and Gabriel DW, 2003. Xanthomonas citri: breaking the surface. Molecular Plant Pathology, 4, 141–157.
42. Bui Thi Ngoc L, Vernière C, Belasque J Jr, Vital K, Boutry S, Gagnevin L and Pruvost O, 2008. Ligation-mediated PCR, a fast and reliable technique for insertion sequence-based typing of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 288, 33–39.
43. Bui Thi Ngoc L, Vernière C, Jarne P, Brisse S, Guérin F, Boutry S, Gagnevin L and Pruvost O, 2009. From local surveys to global surveillance: three high throughput genotyping methods for the epidemiological monitoring of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri pathotypes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75, 1173–1184.
44. Bui Thi Ngoc L, Vernière C, Jouen E, Ah-You N, Lefeuvre P, Chiroleu F, Gagnevin L and Pruvost O, 2010. Amplified fragment length polymorphism and multilocus sequence analysis-based genotypic relatedness among pathogenic variants of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri and Xanthomonas campestris pv. bilvae. International Journal of Systematic Evolutionary Microbiology, 60, 515–525.
45. CABI (CAB International), 2007. Crop Protection Compendium. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Available online: www.cabi.org/cpc/.
46. Canteros BI, Gochez AM, Rybak M, Minsavage G, Jones JB and Stall RE, 2010. Management and characterization of plasmid-encoded copper resistance in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, Saint Denis, Réunion, France, 7–11 June 2010, 145.
47. Carr MKW, 2012. The water relations and irrigation requirements of citrus (Citrus spp.): a review. Experimental Agriculture, 48, 347–377.
48. CDFA (California Department of Food and Agriculture), 2005. Plant health and pest prevention services annual report 2004. CDFA, Sacramento, CA, USA, 93 pp.
49. Centner TJ and Ferreira S, 2012. Ability of governments to take actions to confront incursions of diseases. A case study: citrus canker in Florida. Plant Pathology, 61, 821–828.
50. Christiano RSC, Dalla Pria M, Jesus WC Jr, Parra JRP, Amorim L and Bergamin Filho A, 2007. Effect of citrus leaf-miner damage, mechanical damage and inoculum concentration on severity of symptoms of Asiatic citrus canker in Tahiti lime. Crop Protection, 26, 59–65.
51. Civerolo EL, 1984. Bacterial canker disease of citrus. Journal of the Rio Grande Valley Horticultural Society, 37, 127–145.
52. Civerolo EL and Fan F, 1982. Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri detection and identification by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Plant Disease, 66, 231–236.
53. Coletta-Filho HD, Takita MA, de Souza AA, Neto JR, Destéfano SAL, Hartung JS and Machado MA, 2006. Primers based on the rpf gene region provide improved detection of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri in naturally and artificially infected citrus plants. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 100, 279–285.
54. Colombo A 2004. Coltivare gli Agrumi, Ornamentali da Frutto. Le specie e le varietà, le forme di allevamento, le potature, la propagazione, le cure, la raccolta. De Vecchi Edizioni (abstract). Available online: www.agraria.org/coltivazioniarboree/coltivazioneagrumi.htm
55. Consoli, S, 2010. Individuazione degli interventi per razionalizzare la gestione dei Consorzi di Bonifica. CESEI Catania, 1–64.
56. Cubero J and Graham JH, 2002. Genetic relationship among worldwide strains of Xanthomonas causing canker in citrus species and design of new primers for their identification by PCR. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 1257–1264.
57. Cubero J and Graham JH, 2005. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for bacterial enumeration and allelic discrimination to differentiate Xanthomonas strains on citrus. Phytopathology, 95, 1333–1340.
58. Cubero J, Gell I, Johnson EG, Redondo A and Graham JH, 2011. Unstable green fluorescent protein for study of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri survival on citrus. Plant Pathology, 60, 977–985.
59. Dalla Pria M, Christiano RCS, Furtado EL, Amorim L and Bergamin Filho A, 2006. Effect of temperature and leaf wetness duration on infection of sweet oranges by Asiatic citrus canker. Plant Pathology, 55, 657–663.
60. Das AK, 2003. Citrus canker: a review. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 5, 52–60.
61. Davis RI, Hailstones DL, Jacobson SC, Eichner RH, Gunua TG, Rahamma S and Broadbent P, 2000. Surveillance for citrus canker disease in New Guinea and northern Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology, 29, 222.
62. Del Campo R, Russi P, Mara P, Mara H, Peyrou M, Ponce de León I and Gaggero C, 2009. Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri enters the VBNC state after copper treatment and retains its virulence. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 298, 143–148.
63. Delcourt S, Vernière C, Boyer C, Pruvost O, Hostachy B and Robène-Soustrade I, 2013. Revisiting the specificity of PCR primers for diagnostics of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri by experimental and in silico analyses. Plant Disease, 97, 373–378.
64. de Rogatis A, Ducci F and Tocci A, 1990. An exotic forest tree of possible use in Italy: Zanthoxylum simulans. Italia Forestale e Montana, 45, 361–370.
65. Derso E, Vernière C and Pruvost O, 2009. First report of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri-A* causing citrus canker on lime in Ethiopia. Plant Disease, 93, 203.
66. Dewdney MM and Graham JH, 2012. 2012 Florida citrus pest management guide: citrus canker. University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, FL, USA, 4 pp.
67. Doidge EM, 1929. Further citrus canker studies. Union of South Africa Department Agriculture Bulletin, 51, 1–29.
68. Dotzek N, Groenemeijer P, Feuerstein B, Holzer AM, 2009. Overview of ESSL's severe convective storms research using the European Severe Weather Database ESWD. Atmospheric Research, 93, 575–586.
69. Dowson WJ, 1939. On the systematic position and generic names of the Gram negative bacterial plant pathogens. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene, 2, 177–193.
70. Ducci F and Malentacchi L, 1993. Preliminary micropropagation trials of Zanthoxylum L. simulans. Italia Forestale e Montana, 48, 1, 45–53.
71. Dye DW, 1969. Eradicating citrus canker from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 118, 20–21.
72. Dye DW and Lelliott RA, 1974. Genus II. Xanthomonas Dowson 1939, 187. In: Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, USA, 243–249.
73. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2006. Scientific opinion of the Panel on Plant Health (PLH) on an evaluation of asymptomatic citrus fruit as a pathway for the introduction of citrus canker disease (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri) made by the US Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). The EFSA Journal 2006, 439, 1–41.
74. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Heath on a request from the European Commission on Guignardia citricarpa Kiely. The EFSA Journal 2008, 925, 1–108.
75. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013. Technical meeting on citrus canker. EFSA supporting publication 2013:EN-477, 178 pp.
76. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2014. Outcome of the public consultation on the draft Scientific Opinion of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri and Xanthomonas citri pv. aurantifolii for the EU territory. EFSA supporting publication 2014: EN-554, 178 pp.
77. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2010. Guidance on a harmonised framework for pest risk assessment and the identification and evaluation of pest risk management options by EFSA. EFSA Journal 2010;8(2):1495, 68 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1495
78. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2011. Scientific Opinion on the request from the USA regarding export of Florida citrus fruit to the EU. EFSA Journal 2011;9(12):2461, 99 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2461
79. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2012. Guidance on methodology for evaluation of the effectiveness of options for reducing the risk of introduction and spread of organisms harmful to plant health in the EU territory. EFSA Journal 2012;10(6):2755, 92 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2755
80. EFSA PLH Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Health), 2013. Statement in response to the comments submitted by the US phytosanitary authorities on a previous EFSA opinion (EFSA Journal 2011;9(12):2461) regarding the export of Florida citrus fruit to the EU. EFSA Journal 2013;11(10):3374, 178 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3374
81. EFSA PLH Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Health), 2014. Scientific Opinion on the risk to plant health of Phyllosticta citricarpa (Guignardia citricarpa) for the EU territory with identification and evaluation of risk reduction options. EFSA Journal 2014;12(2):3557, 241 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3557
82. Egel DS, Graham JH and Stall RE, 1991. Genomic relatedness of Xanthomonas campestris strains causing diseases of citrus. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 57, 2724–2730.
83. Elena K, 2006. Alternaria brown spot of Minneola in Greece; evaluation of citrus species susceptibility. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 115, 259–262.
84. El Yacoubi B, Brunings AM, Yuan Q, Shankar S and Gabriel DW, 2007. In planta horizontal transfer of a major pathogenicity effector gene. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73, 1612–1621.
85. EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2005. EPPO Standards Diagnostic PM7/44(1) Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 35, 271–273.
86. EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), 2008. Phytosanitary procedure No. PM 3/66 (2). Guidelines for the management of plant health risks of biowaste of plant origin. OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 38, 4–9.
87. EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), online a. EPPO-PQR (Plant Quarantine Data Retrieval System). Available online: www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
88. EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), online b. EPPO Reporting Service. Available online: www.eppo.int/PUBLICATIONS/reporting/reporting_service.htm
89. Escalon A, Javegny S, Vernière C, Noël LD, Vital K, Poussier S, Hajri A, Boureau T, Pruvost O, Arlat M and Gagnevin L, 2013. Variations in type III effector repertoires, pathological phenotypes and host range of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri pathotypes. Molecular Plant Pathology, 14, 483–496.
90. European Severe Weather Database, online. Available online: www.eswd.eu
91. EUROPHYT, online. The European Network of Plant Health Information System. EUROPHYT database. Available online:europhyt.ec.europa.eu
92. EUROSTAT, online. European Commission, Statistical Office of the European Communities. Available online: epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page?_pageid=1493,1&_dad=dortal&_schema=aORTAL
93. Falico de Alcaraz L, 1986. Multiplication de Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri en el tejido foliar de distintas especies citricas. Fitopatologia, 21, 52–60.
94. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 1995. ISPM No. 4. Requirements for the establishment of pest free areas. Available online: www.ippc.int/index.php?id=13399
95. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 1998. ISPM No. 9. Guidelines for pest eradication programmes. Available online: www.ippc.int/index.php?id=13399
96. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2005. ISPM No. 23. Guidelines for inspection. Available online: www.ippc.int/index.php?id=13399
97. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2007a. ISPM No. 2. Framework for pest risk analysis. Available online: www.ippc.int/index.php?id=13399
98. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2007b. ISPM No. 28. Phytosanitary treatment for regulated pests. Available online: www.ippc.int/index.php?id=13399
99. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2008. ISPM No. 31. Methodologies for sampling of consignments. Available online: www.ippc.int/index.php?id=13399
100. FAO/IBPGR (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)/(International Board for Plant Genetic Resources), 1991. Technical guidelines for the safe movement of citrus germplasm. Eds Frison EA and Taher MM. Rome, 50 pp. Available online: www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/bioversity/publications/pdfs/501_Citrus.pdf?cache=1360066965
101. FAOSTAT, online. Available online: faostat.fao.org/default.aspx
102. Fernandes A and Franquinho Aguiar AM, 2001. Development of quarantine pests Toxoptera citricida (Kirkaldy) and Trioza erytreae (Del Guercio) in the Archipelago of Madeira. Boletin de Sanidad Vegetal, Plagas, 27, 51–58.
103. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Service, 2011. Florida Regulations 5B-62.010– Requirements for Citrus Nursery Structure. Available online: www.lawserver.com/law/state/florida/regulations/florida_regulations_chapter_5b-62
104. Fulton HR and Bowman JJ, 1929. Infection of fruit of Citrus by Pseudomonas citri. Journal of Agricultural Research, 39, 403–426.
105. Gabriel DW, Kingsley MT, Hunter JE and Gottwald T, 1989. Reinstatement of Xanthomonas citri (ex Hasse) and X. phaseoli (ex Smith) to species and reclassification of all X. campestris pv. citri strains. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 39, 14–22.
106. Gambley CF, Miles AK, Ramsden M, Doogan V, Thomas JE, Parmenter K and Whittle PJL, 2009. The distribution and spread of citrus canker in Emerald, Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology, 38, 547–557.
107. Golmohammadi M, Cubero J, Penalver J, Quesada JM, Lopez MM and Llop P, 2007. Diagnosis of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri, causal agent of citrus canker, in commercial fruits by isolation and PCR-based methods. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 103, 2309–2315.
108. Golmohammadi M, Llop P, Scuderi G, Gell I, Graham JH and Cubero J, 2012a. mRNA from selected genes is useful for specific detection and quantification of viable Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. Plant Pathology, 61, 479–488.
109. Golmohammadi M, Llop P, Cubero J and Lopez MM, 2012b. The causal agent of citrus canker, Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri enters in a reversible viable but non culturable state induced by copper, that can be reverted by citrus leaf extract. Abstracts of the XII International Citrus Congress, Valencia, Spain, 209.
110. Gonçalves FP, Stuchi ES, Silva SRd, Reiff ET and Amorim L, 2011. Role of healthy nursery plants in orange yield during eight years of citrus variegated chlorosis epidemics. Scientia Horticulturae, 129, 343–345.
111. Goto M, 1962. Studies on citrus canker. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka University, 12, 3–72.
112. Goto M, 1970. Studies on citrus canker disease. III. Survival of Xanthomonas citri (Hasse) Dowson in soils and on the surface of weeds. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka University, 20, 21–29.
113. Goto M, 1972. Survival of Xanthomonas citri in the bark tissues of citrus trees. Canadian Journal of Botany, 50, 2629–2635.
114. Goto M, 1992. Citrus canker. In: Plant diseases of international importance: diseases of fruit crops. Eds Kumar J, Chaube HS, Sing US and Mukhopadhyay AN. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 170–208.
115. Goto M, Ohta K and Okabe N, 1975. Studies on saprophytic survival of Xanthomonas citri Hasse Dowson 2. Longevity and survival density of the bacterium on artificially infested weeds, plant residues and soil. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 41, 141–147.
116. Goto M, Tadauchi Y and Okabe N, 1979. Interaction between Xanthomonas citri and Erwinia herbicola in vitro and in vivo. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 45, 618–624.
117. Goto M, Toyoshima A and Tanaka S, 1978. Studies on saprophytic survival of Xanthomonas citri (Hasse) Dowson. 3. Inoculum density of the bacterium surviving in the saprophytic form. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 44, 197–201.
118. Gottwald TR and Graham JH, 1992. A device for precise and nondisruptive stomatal inoculation of leaf tissue with bacterial pathogens. Phytopathology, 82, 930–935.
119. Gottwald TR and Irey M, 2007. Post-hurricane analysis of citrus canker II: Predictive model estimation of disease spread and area potentially impacted by various eradication protocols following catastrophic weather events. Plant Health Progress. doi:10.1094/PHP-2007-0405-1001-RS. Available online: www.apsnet.org/publications/apsnetfeatures/Pages/CitrusCankerII.aspx
120. Gottwald TR and Timmer LW, 1995. The efficacy of windbreaks in reducing the spread of citrus canker caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri. Tropical Agriculture, 72, 194–201.
121. Gottwald TR, McGuire RG and Garran S, 1988. Asiatic citrus canker: spatial and temporal spread in simulated new planting situations in Argentina. Phytopathology, 78, 739–745.
122. Gottwald TR, Timmer LW and McGuire RG, 1989. Analysis of disease progress of citrus canker in nurseries in Argentina. Phytopathology 79, 1276–1283.
123. Gottwald TR, Graham JH and Egel DS, 1992. Analysis of foci of Asiatic citrus canker in a Florida citrus orchard. Plant Disease, 76, 389–396.
124. Gottwald TR, Graham J, Civerolo E, Barrett H and Hearn C, 1993. Differential host range reaction of citrus and citrus relatives to citrus canker and citrus bacterial spot determinated by leaf mesophyll susceptiblity. Plant Disease, 77, 1004–1009.
125. Gottwald TR, Graham JH and Schubert TS, 1997. An epidemiological analysis of the spread of citrus canker in urban Miami, Florida, and synergistic interaction with the Asian citrus leafminer. Fruits, 52, 383–390.
126. Gottwald TR, Hughes G, Graham JH, Sun X and Riley T, 2001. The citrus canker epidemic in Florida: the scientific basis of regulatory eradication policy for an invasive species. Phytopathology, 91, 30–34.
127. Gottwald TR, Graham JH and Schubert TS, 2002a. Citrus canker: the pathogen and its impact. Plant Health Progress. doi:10.1094/PHP-2002-0812-01-RV. Available online: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/php/review/citruscanker/.
128. Gottwald TR, Sun X, Riley T, Graham JH, Ferrandino F and Taylor EL, 2002b. Georeferenced spatiotemporal analysis of the urban citrus canker epidemic in Florida. Phytopathology, 92, 361–377.
129. Gottwald TR, Bassanezi RB, Amorim L and Bergamin Filho A, 2007. Spatial pattern analysis of citrus canker-infected plantings in São Paulo, Brazil, and augmentation of infection elicited by the Asian leafminer. Phytopathology, 97, 674–683.
130. Gottwald TR, Graham JH, Bock C, Bonn G, Civerolo EL, Irey M, Leite RP Jr, McCollum G, Parker P, Ramallo J, Riley T, Schubert T, Stein B and Taylor E, 2009. The epidemiological significance of post-packinghouse survival of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri for dissemination of Asiatic citrus canker via infected fruit. Crop Protection, 28, 508–524.
131. Graham JH and Gottwald TR, 1989. Variation in aggressiveness of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citrumelo associated with citrus bacterial spot (CBS) in Florida. Phytopathology, 79, 1182.
132. Graham JH and Gottwald TR, 1990. Variation in aggressiveness of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citrumelo associated with citrus bacterial spot in Florida citrus nurseries. Phytopathology, 80, 190–196.
133. Graham JH and Gottwald TR, 1991. Research perspectives on eradication of citrus bacterial diseases in Florida. Plant Disease, 75, 1193–1200.
134. Graham JH and Leite RP Jr, 2004. Lack of control of citrus canker by induced systemic resistance compounds. Plant Disease, 88, 745–750.
135. Graham JH, McGuire RG and Miller JW, 1987. Survival of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri in citrus plant debris and soil in Florida and Argentina. Plant Disease, 71, 1094–1098.
136. Graham JH, Gottwald TR, Civerolo EL and McGuire RG, 1989. Population dynamics and survival of Xanthomonas campestris in soil in citrus nurseries in Maryland and Argentina. Plant Disease, 73, 423–427.
137. Graham JH, Gottwald TR, Riley TD and Bruce MA, 1992. Susceptibility of citrus fruit to bacterial spot and citrus canker. Phytopathology, 82, 452–457.
138. Graham JH, Gottwald TR, Riley TD, Cubero J and Drouillard DL, 2000. Survival of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri (Xcc) on various surfaces and chemical control of Asiatic citrus canker (ACC). Proceedings of the 1st International Citrus Canker Research Workshop, Fort Pierce, FL, USA, 7.
139. Graham JH, Gottwald TR, Cubero J and Achor DS, 2004. Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri: factors affecting successful eradication of citrus canker. Molecular Plant Pathology, 5, 1–15.
140. Hailstones DL, Weinert MP, Smith MW, Ghalayini A and Gambley CF, 2005. Evaluating potential alternative hosts of citrus canker. Proceedings of the 2nd International Citrus Canker and Huanglongbing Research Workshop, 7–11 November, 2005, Orlando, Florida', USA, Vol. 1, p. 71.
141. Hall DG, Gottwald TR and Bock CH, 2010. Exacerbation of citrus canker by citrus leafminer Phyllocnistis citrella in Florida. Florida Entomologist, 93, 558–566.
142. Hartung JS, Daniel JF and Pruvost OP, 1993. Detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri by the polymerase chain reaction method. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 59, 1143–1148.
143. Hartung JS, Pruvost OP, Villemot I and Alvarez A, 1996. Rapid and sensitive colorimetric detection of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri by immunocapture and a nested-polymerase chain reaction assay. Phytopathology, 86, 95–101.
144. Hasse CH, 1915. Pseudomonas citri, the cause of citrus canker. Journal of Agricultural Research, 4, 97–99.
145. Hyun JW, Kim HJ, Yi PH, Hwang RY and Park EW, 2012. Mode of action of streptomycin resistance in the citrus canker pathogen (Xanthomonas smithii subsp citri) in Jeju Island. Plant Pathology Journal, 28, 207–211.
146. Irey M, Gottwald TR, Graham JH, Riley TD and Carlton G, 2006. Post-hurricane analysis of citrus canker spread and progress towards the development of a predictive model to estimate disease spread due to catastrophic weather events. Plant Health Progress. doi:10.1094/PHP-2006-0822-01-RS. Available online: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/php/research/2006/canker/.
147. Jaciani FJ, Destefano SAL, Neto JR and Belasque J Jr, 2009. Detection of a new bacterium related to Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. aurantifolii infecting Swingle citrumelo in Brazil. Plant Disease, 93, 1074.
148. Janssen P, Coopman R, Huys G, Swings J, Bleeker M, Vos P, Zabeau M and Kersters K, 1996. Evaluation of the DNA fingerprinting method AFLP as a new tool in bacterial taxonomy. Microbiology, 142, 1881–1893.
149. Jehle RA, 1917. Susceptibility of non-citrus plants to bacterium citri. Phytopathology, 7, 339–344.
150. Jetter KM, Summer DA and Civerolo EL, 2000. Ex ante economics of exotic disease policy: citrus canker in California. Proceedings of the Integrating Risk Assessment and Economics for Regulatory Decisions, 7 December 2000, Washington, DC, USA, 57 pp.
151. JRC (Joint Research Center of the European Commission), online. Agricultural landuse map EU15 and EU12. Available online: afoludata.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.php/dataset/files/34
152. Jones JB, Jackson LE, Balogh B, Obradovic A, Iriarte FB and Momol MT, 2007. Bacteriophages for plant disease control. Annual Review of Phytopathology 45, 245–262.
153. Juhasz C, Leduc A, Boyer C, Guérin F, Vernière C, Pruvost O, Wonni I, and Ouedraogo L, 2013. First report of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri causing Asiatic citrus canker in Burkina Faso. Plant Disease 97, 1653.
154. Kalita P, Bora LC, Bhagabati KN, 1996. Phylloplane microflora of citrus and their role in management of citrus canker. Indian Phytopathology, 49, 234–237.
155. Kalita P, Bora LC and Bhagabati KN, 1997. Goat weed, a new host of citrus canker (Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri). Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, 27, 96–97.
156. Khuntong S and Sudprasert W, 2008. Extraction and basic testing for antibacterial activity of the chemical constituents in Suregada multiflorum. Kasetsart Journal, 42, 429–434.
157. Kingsley MT and Fritz LK, 2000. Identification of the citrus canker pathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri A by fluorescent PCR assays. Phytopathology, 90, S42.
158. Koizumi M, 1972. Studies on the symptoms of citrus canker formed on satsuma mandarin fruit and existence of causal bacteria in the affected tissues. Bulletin of the Horticultural Research Station, B, 12, 229–243.
159. Koizumi M, 1976. Incubation period of citrus canker in relation to temperature. Bulletin of the Fruit Tree Research Station, B, 3, 33–46.
160. Koizumi M, 1977. Behaviour of Xanthomonas citri (Hasse) Dowson and histological changes of diseased tissued in the process of lesion extension. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 43, 129–136.
161. Koizumi M, 1978. Resistance of citrus plants to bacterial canker disease. Shokubutsu boeki (Plant Protection), 32, 207–211.
162. Koizumi M, 1979. Ultrastructural changes in susceptible and resistant plants of Citrus following artificial inoculation with Xanthomonas citri (Hasse) Dowson. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 45, 635–644.
163. Koizumi M, 1985. Citrus canker: the world situation. In: Citrus canker: an international perspective. Ed Timmer LW. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, USA, 2–7.
164. Kuan TL, Minsavage GV and Schaad NW, 1986. Aerial dispersal of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris from naturally infected Brassica campestris. Plant Disease, 70, 409–413.
165. Kuhara S, 1978. Present epidemic status and control of the citrus canker disease (Xanthomonas citri (Hasse) Dowson) in Japan. Review of Plant Protection Research, 11, 132–142.
166. Kuo TT, Chiang CC, Chen SY, Lin JH and Kuo JL, 1994. A long lytic cycle in filamentous phage Cf1Tv infecting Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri. Archives of Virology, 135, 253–264.
167. Leduc A, Vernière C, Boyer C, Vital K, Pruvost O, Niang Y and Rey JY, 2011. First report of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri pathotype A causing Asiatic citrus canker on grapefruit and Mexican lime in Senegal. Plant Disease, 95, 1311.
168. Lee HA, 1918. Further data on the susceptibility of rutaceous plants to citrus canker. Journal of Agricultural Research, 15, 661–665.
169. Leip A, Marchi G, Koeble R, Kempen M Britz W and Li C, 2008. Linking an economic model for European agriculture with a mechanistic model to estimate nitrogen and carbon losses from arable soils in Europe. Biogeosciences, 5, 73–94.
170. Leite RP Jr and Mohan SK, 1987. Survival of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri (Hasse) Dye in soil and in association with some gramineous plants. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, São Paulo, Brazil, 365–368.
171. Leite RP Jr and Mohan SK, 1990. Integrated management of the citrus bacterial canker disease caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri in the State of Paraná, Brazil. Crop Protection, 9, 3–7.
172. Leite RP Jr, Mohan SK, Pereira ALG and Campacci CA, 1987. Integrated control of citrus canker: effect of genetic resistance and application of bactericides. (Controle integrado de cancro cítrico: efeito da resistência genética e da aplicação de bactericidas). Fitopatologia Brasileira, 12, 257–263.
173. Liberati C, 2008. Uso irriguo dell'acqua e principali implicazioni di natura ambientale: rapporto irrigazione. Istituto Nazionale di Economia Agraria, 289 pp.
174. Lins EC, Belasque J Jr and Marcassa LG, 2009. Detection of citrus canker in citrus plants using laser induced fluorescence spectroscopy. Precision Agriculture, 10, 319–330.
175. McGuire RG, 1988. Evaluation of bactericidal chemicals for control of Xanthomonas on citrus. Plant Disease, 72, 1016–1020.
176. MacLeod A, Anderson H, Follak S, van der Gaag DJ, Potting R, Pruvost O, Smith J, Steffek R, Vloutoglou I, Holt J, Karadjova O, Kehlenbeck H, Labonne G, Reynaud P, Viane N, Anthoine G, Holeva M, Hostachy B, Ilieva Z, Karssen G, Krumov V, Limon P, Meffert G, Niere B, Petrova E, Peyre J, Pfeilstetter E, Roelofs W, Rothlisberger F, Sauvion N, Schenck N, Schrader G, Schroeder T, Steinmoller S, Tjou-Tiam-Sim L, Ventsislavov V, Verhoeven K and Wesemael W, 2012. Pest risk assessment for the European Community plant health: a comparative approach with case studies. Supporting publications 2012: EN 319.[1053 pp.]. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/publications
177. McInnes TB, Gitaitis RD, McCarter SM, Jaworski CA and Phatak SC, 1988. Airborne dispersal of bacteria in tomato and pepper transplant fields. Plant Disease, 72, 575–579.
178. MAGRAMA (Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentacion y medio ambiante), 2013. Encuesta sobre superficies y rendimientos de cultivos: informe sobre regadíos en España. 42 pp.
179. Manceau C, Gardan L and Devaux M, 1986. Dynamics of RP4 plasmid transfer between Xanthomonas campestris pv. corylina and Erwinia herbicola in hazelnut tissues, in planta. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 32, 835–841.
180. Mavrodieva V, Levy L and Gabriel DW, 2004. Improved sampling methods for real-time polymerase chain reaction diagnosis of citrus canker from field samples. Phytopathology, 94, 61–68.
181. Mehmet O and Ali Biçak H, 2002. Modern and traditional irrigation technologies in the Eastern Mediterranean. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada, 27–73.
182. Migheli Q, Cacciola SO, Balmas V, Pane A, Ezra D and di San Lio GM, 2009. Mal secco disease caused by Phoma tracheiphila: a potential threat to lemon production worldwide. Plant Disease, 93, 852–867.
183. Mioulane P, 2013. Bonsaï d'intérieur. Hachette Pratique, 93 pp.
184. Miyoshi T, Sawada H, Tachibana Y and Matsuda I, 1998. Detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri by PCR using primers from the spacer region between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 64, 249–254.
185. MVCB (Murray Valley Citrus Board), 2012. Message from the Chairman, Murray Valley Citrus Board Newsletter, 3 July 2012, Avalable online: mvcitrus.org.au/mvcb/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Citrus-Board-News-for-3rd-07-2012.pdf
186. Namekata T and Oliveira DDA, 1972. Comparative serological studies between Xanthomonas citri and a bacterium causing canker on mexican lime. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, 14-21 April, 1971, Wageningen, Netherlands, 151–152.
187. NAPPFAST (North Carolina State University-Animal Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Pest Forecasting), online, NAPPFAST Global Plant Hardiness Maps, 2012. Maps using CFSR base data. Available online: www.nappfast.org/Plant_hardiness/2012/2012%20ph_index.htm
188. NAPPO (North American Plant Protection Organization), 2013, online. Detection of Citrus Canker (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri) in Louisiana. Official Pest Report from 07/01/2013. Available online: www.pestalert.org/oprDetail.cfm?oprID=550
189. National Statistics Office, Malta (2010). Estimating volume of water usage for irrigation in Malta. Eurostat Grant Ref. No. 40701.2008.001-2008.130, 1–26.
190. Navarro L, 1992. II.6 Citrus shoot tip grafting in vitro. In: Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, Vol. 18. Ed. Bajaj YPS. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heildelberg, 327–338.
191. Navarro L, Civerolo EL, Juarez J and Garnsey SM, 1991. Improving therapy methods for citrus germplasm exchange. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the International Organization of Citrus Virologists. IOCV, Riverside, CA, USA, 400–408.
192. Navarro L, Pina J, Juárez J, Ballester-Olmos J, Arregui J, Ortega C, Navarro A, Duran-Vila N, Guerri J and Moreno P, Cambra M, Medina A and Zaragoza S, 2002. Surveys and certification: the citrus variety improvement program in Spain in the period 1975–2001. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Organisation of Citrus Virologists, Paphos, Cyprus, 11-16 November, 2001, 306–316.
193. Norberto JC, 2011. General Agricultural Census 2009 for the culture of citrus Algarve. CD-ROM edition.
194. Ohta T, 1983. Interactions in vitro and in vivo between Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri and antagonistic Pseudomonas sp. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan, 49, 308–315.
195. Palm ME and Civerolo EL, 1994. Isolation, pathogenicity and partial host range of Alternaria limicola, causal agent of mancha foliar de los citricos in Mexico. Plant Disease, 78, 879–883.
196. Park DS, Hyun JW, Park YJ, Kim JS, Kang HW, Hahn JH and Go SJ, 2006. Sensitive and specific detection of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri by PCR using pathovar specific primers based on hrpW gene sequences. Microbiological Research, 161, 145–149.
197. Parker PE, Bock CH and Gottwald TR, 2005. Comparison of techniques to sample Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri in windblown spray. Plant Disease 89, 1324–1330.
198. Parker PE, Bock CH, Cook AZ and Gottwald T, 2008. Dispersal of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri bacteria downwind from harvested, infected fruit. Phytopathology, 98, p. 121.
199. Parkinson N, Aritua V, Heeney J, Cowie C, Bew J and Stead D, 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of Xanthomonas species by comparison of partial gyrase B gene sequences. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 57, 2881–2887.
200. Parnell S, Gottwald T, Van Den Bosch F and Gilligan C, 2009. Optimal strategies for the eradication of Asiatic citrus canker in heterogeneous host landscapes. Phytopathology, 99, 1370–1376.
201. Passos OS, da Cunha Sobrinho AP and Santos Filho HP, 2000. Citrus certification programs in Brazil, Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the International Organisation of Citrus Virologists, 2000– Short Communications, 391–399.
202. Patel MK, Allayyanavaramath SB and Kulkarni YS, 1953. Bacterial shot-hole and fruit canker of Aegle marmelos Correa. Current Science, 22, 216–217.
203. Peltier GL, 1920. Influence of temperature and humidity on the growth of pseudomonas citri and its host plants and on infection and development of the disease. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 447–506.
204. Peltier GL and Frederich WJ, 1920. Relative susceptibility to citrus-canker of different species and hybrids of the genus Citrus, including the wild relatives. Journal of Agricultural Research, 19, 339–362.
205. Peltier GL and Frederich WJ, 1924. Further studies on the relative susceptibility to citrus canker of different species and hybrids of the genus Citrus, including the wild relatives. Journal of Agricultural Research, 28, 227–239.
206. Peltier GL and Frederich WJ, 1926. Effect of weather on the world distribution and prevalence of citrus canker and citrus scab. Journal of Agricultural Research, 32, 147–164.
207. Pons E, 2008. El regadío valenciano modernización, eficiencia, sostenibilidad. Jornada Técnica sobre la gestión eficiente de los sistemas de riego en agricultura. Valencia, 16 abril 2008. Inst. Ing. Agua y MA-Univ. Politécnica de Valencia.
208. Praloran JC, 1971. Les agrumes. GP Maisonneuve and Larose, Paris, 520 pp.
209. Pruvost O and Gagnevin L, 2002. Population structure of xanthomonads with endophytic and epiphytic phases: the example of the pathovar mangiferaeindicae/mango pathosystem. In: Phyllosphere microbiology. Eds Lindow SE, Hecht-Poinar EI and Elliott VJ. American Phytopathological Society Press, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 209–221.
210. Pruvost O, Gottwald TR and Brocherieux C, 1999. The effect of irrigation practices on the spatiotemporal increase of Asiatic citrus canker in stimulated nursery plots in Reunion Island. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 105, 23–37.
211. Pruvost O, Boher B, Brocherieux C, Nicole M and Chiroleu F, 2002. Survival of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri in leaf lesions under tropical environmental conditions and simulated splash dispersal of inoculum. Phytopathology, 92, 336–346.
212. Pruvost O, Roumagnac P, Gaube C, Chiroleu F and Gagnevin L, 2005. New media for the semi-selective isolation and enumeration of Xanthomonas campestris pv. mangiferaeindicae, the causal agent of mango bacterial black spot. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 99, 803–815.
213. Rademaker JLW, Hoste B, Louws FJ, Kersters K, Swings J, Vauterin L, Vauterin P and de Bruijn FJ, 2000. Comparison of AFLP and rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting with DNA-DNA homology studies: Xanthomonas as a model system. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 50, 665–677.
214. Rademaker JLW, Louws FJ, Schultz MH, Rossbach U, Vauterin L, Swings J and de Bruijn FJ, 2005. A comprehensive species to strain taxonomic framework for Xanthomonas. Phytopathology, 95, 1098–1111.
215. Recupero S, Caruso A and Russo G, 2001. Comparison between some ornamental Citrus genotypes on six rootstocks. Rivista di Frutticoltura, 63, 61–67.
216. Reddy MRS, 1997. Sources of resistance to bacterial canker in Citrus. Indian Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, 27, 80–81.
217. RHS (The Royal Horticultural Society), 1996. A-Z encyclopedia of garden plants. Ed Brickell C. Dorling Kindersley, London, 1136 pp.
218. Rigano LA, Siciliano F, Enrique R, Sendin L, Filippone P, Torres PS, Questa J, Dow JM, Castagnaro AP, Vojnov AA and Marano MR, 2007. Biofilm formation, epiphytic fitness, and canker development in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 20, 1222–1230.
219. Rigano LA, Marano MR, Castagnaro AP, Do Amaral AM and Vojnov AA, 2010. Rapid and sensitive detection of citrus bacterial canker by loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with simple visual evaluation methods. BMC Microbiology, 10, 176.
220. Rinaldi DAMF and Leite RP Jr, 2000. Adaptation of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri population to the presence of copper compounds in nature. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 2, 1064.
221. Roberto SR, Gottwald TR, Graham JH and Riley T, 2001. Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri aerosol production in Miami, Florida. Summa Phytopathologica, 27, 56–60.
222. Rodriguez SG, Garza JGL, Stapleton JJ and Civerolo EL, 1985. Citrus bacteriosis in Mexico. Plant Disease, 69, 808–810.
223. Rodriguez LM, Grajales A, Arrieta-Ortiz ML, Salazar C, Restrepo S and Bernal A, 2012. Genomes-based phylogeny of the genus Xanthomonas. BMC Microbiology, 12, 14.
224. Rooney CP, Zhao FJ and McGrath SP, 2006. Soil factors controlling the expression of copper toxicity to plants in a wide range of European soils. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 25, 726–732.
225. Rossetti V, 1977. Citrus Canker in Latin America: a review. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 3, 918–924.
226. Rossetti V, 1981. Identificaçao do cancro citrico. Biologico São Paulo, 47, 145–153.
227. Rybak M, Minsavage GV, Stall RE and Jones JB, 2009. Identification of Xanthomonas citri ssp. citri host specificity genes in a heterologous expression host. Molecular Plant Pathology, 10, 249–262.
228. Samavi S, Hassanzadeh N, Faghihi MM and Danesh YR, 2009. Effects of thyme (zaatar) essential oil and some chemical compounds in the control of citrus bacterial canker in Iran. Journal of Plant Pathology, 91, 691–696.
229. Schaad NW, Postnikova E, Lacy GH, Sechler A, Agarkova I, Stromberg PE, Stromberg VK and Vidaver AK, 2005. Reclassification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri (ex Hasse 1915) Dye 1978 forms A, B/C/D, and E as X. smithii subsp. citri (ex Hasse) sp. nov. nom. rev. comb. nov., X. fuscans subsp. aurantifolii (ex Gabriel 1989) sp. nov. nom. rev. comb. nov., and X. alfalfae subsp. citrumelo (ex Riker and Jones) Gabriel et al., 1989 sp. nov. nom. rev. comb. nov.; X. campestris pv. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Dye 1978 as X. smithii subsp. smithii nov. comb. nov. nom. nov.; X. campestris pv. alfalfae (ex Riker and Jones, 1935) Dye 1978 as X. alfalfae subsp. alfalfae (ex Riker et al., 1935) sp. nov. nom. rev.; and “var. fuscans” of X. campestris pv. phaseoli (ex Smith, 1987) Dye 1978 as X. fuscans subsp. fuscans sp. nov. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 28, 494–518.
230. Schaad NW, Postnikova E, Lacy GH, Sechler A, Agarkova I, Stromberg PE, Stromberg VK and Vidaver AK, 2006. Amended classification of xanthomonad pathogens on citrus. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 29, 690–695.
231. Schubert T, Rizvi S, Sun X, Gottwald T, Graham J and Dixon W, 2001. Meeting the challenge of eradicating citrus canker in Florida-again. Plant Disease, 85, 341–356.
232. Scuderi G, Golmohammadi M, Cubero J, Cubero M.M. L, Cirvilleri G and Llop P, 2010. Development of a simplified NASBA protocol for detecting viable cells of the citrus pathogen Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri under different treatments. Plant Pathology, 59, 764–772.
233. Serizawa S and Inoue K, 1975. Studies on citrus canker. III. The influence of wind on infection. Bulletin of the Shizuoka Citrus Experiment Station, 11, 54–67.
234. Serizawa S, Inoue K and Goto M, 1969. Studies on citrus canker disease. I. Dispersal of the citrus canker organism. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka University, 8, 81–85.
235. Shiotani H, Yoshioka T, Yamamoto M and Matsumoto R, 2008. Susceptibility to citrus canker causedby Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri depends on the nuclear genome of the host plant. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 74, 133–138.
236. Shiotani H, Uematsu H, Tsukamoto T, Shimizu Y, Ueda K, Mizuno A and Sato S, 2009. Survival and dispersal of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri from infected Satsuma mandarin fruit. Crop Protection 28, 19–23.
237. Shirgure PS, 2012. Micro-irrigation systems, automation and fertigation in citrus. Scientific Journal of Review, 1, 156–169.
238. Species 2000, online. Species 2000 database. Available online: www.sp2000.org/.
239. Spreen TH, Zansler ML, Muraro RP and Roka F, 2003. The costs and benefits associated with eradicating citrus canker in Florida. Proceedings of the The American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, 27-30 July 2003, Montreal, Canada, 24.
240. Stall RE and Civerolo EL, 1991. Research relating to the recent outbreak of citrus canker in Florida. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 29, 399–420.
241. Stall RE and Civerolo EL, 1993. Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria: cause of bacterial spot of tomato and pepper. In: Xanthomonas. Eds Swings JG and Civerolo EL. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 57–60.
242. Stall RE and Minsavage GV, 1990. The use of hrp genes to identify opportunistic xanthomonads. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, 11-16 June, 1989, Budapest, Hungary, 369–374.
243. Stall RE and Seymour CP, 1983. Canker, a threat to citrus in the Gulf-Coast states. Plant Disease, 67, 581–585.
244. Stall RE, Miller J, Marco GM and Echenique BIC, 1980. Population dynamics of Xanthomonas citri causing cancrosis of citrus in Argentina. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 10–14.
245. Stall RE, Miller JW, Marco GM and Canteros de Echenique BIC, 1981. Timing of sprays to control cancrosis of grapefruit in Argentina. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 1, 414–417.
246. Stall RE, Marco GM and Canteros BIC, 1982. Importance of mesophyll in mature-leaf resistance to cancrosis of Citrus. Phytopathology, 72, 1097–1100.
247. Stapleton JJ and Medina VM, 1984. Evaluation of copper oxychloride sprays to control bacteriosis disease of Mexican lime trees in Colima, Mexico. Phytopathology, 74, p. 879.
248. Stein B, Ramallo J, Foguet J and Graham JH, 2007. Citrus leafminer control and copper sprays for management of citrus canker on lemon in Tucumán, Argentina. Procedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 120, 127–131.
249. Stelinski LL and Czokajlo D, 2010. Suppression of citrus leafminer, Phyllocnistis citrella, with an attract-and-kill formulation. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 134, 69–77.
250. Stewart BA and Nielsen DR, 1990. Irrigation of agricultural crops. Agronomy Monograph, 80, 436–467.
251. Stover E, Castle WS and Spyke P, 2008. The citrus grove of the future and its implications for Huanglongbing management. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society,121, 155–159.
252. Sun XA, Stall RE, Jones JB, Cubero J, Gottwald TR, Graham JH, Dixon WN, Schubert TS, Chaloux PH, Stromberg VK, Lacy GH and Sutton BD, 2004. Detection and characterization of a new strain of citrus canker bacteria from key Mexican lime and Alemow in South Florida. Plant Disease, 88, 1179–1188.
253. Timmer LW, 1988. Evaluation of bactericides for control of citrus canker in Argentina. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 101, 6–9.
254. Timmer LW, Garnsey SM and Graham JH, 2000. Compendium of citrus diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN, USA, 92 pp.
255. Timmer LW, Gottwald TR and Zitko SE, 1991. Bacterial exudation from lesions of Asiatic citrus canker and citrus bacterial spot. Plant Disease, 75, 192–195.
256. Timmer LW, Zitko SE and Gottwald TR, 1996. Population dynamics of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri on symptomatic and asymptomatic citrus leaves under various environmental conditions. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 1, 448–451.
257. Traoré YN, Bui Thi Ngoc L, Vernière C and Pruvost O, 2008. First report of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri causing citrus canker in Mali. Plant Disease, 92, 977.
258. Tucker D and Wheaton TA, 1978. Trends in higher citrus planting densities. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 36–40.
259. Unnamalai N and Gnanamanickam SS, 1984. Pseudomonas fluorescens is an antagonist to Xanthomonas citri (Hasse) Dye, the incitant of citrus canker. Current Science, 53, 703–704.
260. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 2006. Evaluation of asymptomatic citrus fruit (Citrus spp.) as a pathway for the introduction of citrus canker disease (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri). Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Riverdale, MD, USA, 22 pp.
261. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 2007a. Evaluation of asymptomatic citrus fruit (Citrus spp.) as a pathway for the introduction of citrus canker disease (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri). Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Riverdale, MD, USA, 36 pp.
262. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 2007b. Revised risk management analysis, movement of commercially packed citrus fruit from citrus canker disease quarantine area. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Riverdale, MD, USA, 123 pp. Available online: www.aphis.usda.gov/peer_review/downloads/07-022-3RMA11-13-07.pdf
263. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 2008. An updated evaluation of citrus fruit (Citrus spp.) as a pathway for the introduction of citrus canker disease (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv citri). Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Riverdale, MD, USA, 9 pp. Available online: www.aphis.usda.gov/peer_review/downloads/citrus_movement/CitrusCankerUpdate_12-31-08.pdf
264. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 2009a. An updated evaluation of citrus fruit (Citrus spp.) as a pathway for the introduction of citrus canker disease (Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri). Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Riverdale, MD, USA, 11 pp.
265. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 2009b. Peer review of supplemental risk management analysis for movement of citrus fruit from citrus canker disease quarantine area. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Riverdale, MD, USA, 45 pp.
266. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 2009c. Response to peer review, movement of citrus fruit from citrus canker disease quarantine area, supplemental risk management analysis. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Riverdale, MD, USA, 10 pp. Available online: www.aphis.usda.gov/peer_review/downloads/citrus_movement/APHIS_Peer_review_response.pdf.
267. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), 2012. APHIS response to “Scientific opinion on the request from USA regarding export of Florida citrus to the EU”, version April 2012, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, USA, 12 pp. (Document provided to EFSA as attachment to the Request to provide this Scientific Opinion-see first reference in the section Documentation provided to EFSA.) Available online: registerofquestions.efsa.europa.eu/roqFrontend/?wicket:interface=:1::::
268. USDA-GRIN, online. USDA-GRIN taxonomy database. Available online: www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/index.pl
269. Vauterin L and Swings J, 1997. Are classification and phytopathological diversity compatible in Xanthomonas? Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 19, 77–82.
270. Vauterin L, Hoste B, Kersters K and Swings J, 1995. Reclassification of Xanthomonas. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 45, 472–489.
271. Vernière C, Hartung JS, Pruvost OP, Civerolo EL, Alvarez AM, Maestri P and Luisetti J, 1998. Characterization of phenotypically distinct strains of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri from Southwest Asia. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 104, 477–487.
272. Vernière C, Gottwald TR and Pruvost O, 2003. Disease development and symptom expression of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri in various citrus plant tissues. Phytopathology, 93, 832–843.
273. Vernière C, Vital K, Boyer C, Pruvost O and Carter BA, 2013. First report of sequence type 1, pathotype A Xanthomonas citri pv. citri from lime and lemon fruit originating from Bangladesh. Plant Disease, 97, 836.
274. Vicent A, Armengol J and García-Jiménez J, 2009. Protectant activity of reduced concentration copper sprays against Alternaria brown spot on 'Fortune'mandarin fruit in Spain. Crop Protection, 28, 1–6.
275. Vidalakis G, da Graça JV, Dixon WN, Ferrin D, Kesinger M, Krueger RR, Lee RF, Melzer MJ, Olive J, Polek ML, Sieburth PJ, Williams LL and Wright GC, 2010. Citrus qarantine sanitary and certification programs in the USA, Prevention of introduction and distribution of citrus diseases, Part 1–Citrus quarantine and introduction programs. Citrograph, May-June 2010, 26–39.
276. von Broembsen L and Lee A, 1988. South Africa's citrus improvement programme. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the International Organization of Citrus Virologists. Riverside, CA, USA, 407–416.
277. Wardowski WF, 1981. Packinghouse operations and shipping conditions of citrus for export. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 94, 254–256.
278. Wills R, McGlasson B, Graham D and Joyce D, 1998. Post harvest: an introduction to the physiology and handling of fruit, vegetables and ornamentals. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 262 pp.
279. Wu W, Chung K and Chang W, 1995. Stability of the Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri phages CP115 and CP122. Plant Pathology Bulletin,4, 1–7.
280. Xiao YF, Qureshi JA and Stansly PA, 2007. Contribution of predation and parasitism to mortality of citrus leafminer Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) populations in Florida. Biological Control, 40, 396–404.
281. Young JM, Bradbury JF, Davis RE, Dickey RS, Ercolani GL, Hayward AC and Vidaver AK, 1991. Nomenclatural revisions of plant pathogenic bacteria and list of names 1980–1988. Review of Plant Pathology, 70, 211–221.
282. Young JM, Bull C, de Boer S, Firrao G, Gardan L, Saddler G, Stead D and Takikawa Y, 2001. International standards for naming pathovars of phytopathogenic bacteria. Available online: www.isppweb.org/about_tppb_naming.asp
283. Young JM, Park DC, Shearman HM and Fargier E, 2008. A multilocus sequence analysis of the genus Xanthomonas. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 31, 366–377.
284. Zalom F, Civerolo EL, Hoddle M, Jetter K and Thille D, 1999. Case studies: citrus canker; avocado thrips and mites. In: Exotic pests and diseases: biology, economics, public policy. Summary report of a conference sponsored by Agricultural Issues Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 115–136.