Evaluation of brief screens for gambling disorder in the substance use treatment setting

American Journal on Addictions

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 460-466

  Himelhoch, Seth S ^a   Miles Mclean, Haley ^a   Medoff, Deborah R ^a   Kreyenbuhl, Julie ^a   Rugle, Loreen ^a   Bailey Kloch, Marie ^a   Potts, Wendy ^a   Welsh, Christopher ^a   Brownley, Julie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT; BEHAVIOR DISORDER ASSESSMENT; BRIEF BIOSOCIAL GAMBLING SCREENER; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROL LYING AND PREOCCUPATION MEASURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; DSM-5; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCOME; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIE BET QUESTIONNAIRE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; METHADONE TREATMENT; MONEY; NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER DSM SCREEN FOR GAMBLING PROBLEM; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOCCUPATION ESCAPE CHASING AND RISKED RELATIONSHIPS MEASURE; PREVALENCE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIAL STATUS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; ADOLESCENT; AGED; BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM; COMORBIDITY; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; GAMBLING; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALCOHOL DRINKING; BEHAVIORAL RISK FACTOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM; COMORBIDITY; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937974893     PISSN: 10550496     EISSN: 15210391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ajad.12241     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lorains FK, Cowlishaw S, Thomas SA,. Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys. Addiction 2011; 106: 490-498.
2. Shaffer HJ, Hall MN,. Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada. Can J Public Health 2001; 92: 168-192.
3. Feigelman W, Wallisch LS, Lesieur HR,. Problem gamblers, problem substance users, and dual-problem individuals: An epidemiological study. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 467-470.
4. Langenbucher J, Bavly L, Labouvie E, et al., Clinical features of pathological gambling in an addictions treatment cohort. Psychol Addict Behav 2001; 15: 77.
5. Rupcich N, Frisch GR, Govoni R,. Comorbidity of pathological gambling in addiction treatment facilities. J Subst Abuse Treat 1997; 14: 573-574.
6. Toneatto T, Brennan J,. Pathological gambling in treatment-seeking substance abusers. Addict Behav 2002; 27: 465-469.
7. Spunt B, Lesieur H, Liberty HJ, et al., Pathological gamblers in methadone treatment: A comparison between men and women. J Gambl Stud 1996; 12: 431-449.
8. Weinstock J, Blanco C, Petry NM,. Health correlates of pathological gambling in a methadone maintenance clinic. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2006; 14: 87.
9. Stinchfield R,. Screening and assessment of problem and pathological gambling. In:, Reilly C, Kugler A, Smith N, Mayes NP, eds. Increasing the odds: A series dedicated to understanding gambling disorders, volume 7 what clinicians need to know about gambling disorders (pp. 26-37). National center for responsible gaming. 26-37) 2012.
10. Volberg RA, Williams RJ,. Developing a short from of the PGSI. Birmingham, Great Britain: Report to the UK Gambling Commission; 2012.
11. Johnson EE, Hamer R, Nora RM, et al., The Lie/Bet Questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers. Psychol Rep 1997; 80: 83-88.
12. Toce-Gerstein M, Gerstein DR, Volberg RA,. The NODS-CLiP: A rapid screen for adult pathological and problem gambling. J Gambl Stud 2009; 25: 541-555.
13. Volberg RA, Munck IM, Petry NM,. A quick and simple screening method for pathological and problem gamblers in addiction programs and practices. Am J Addict 2011; 20: 220-227.
14. Gebauer L, LaBrie R, Shaffer H,. Optimizing DSM-IV-TR classification accuracy: A brief biosocial screen for detecting current gambling disorders among gamblers in the general household population. Can J Psychiatr 2010; 55: 82-90.
15. Stinchfield R,. A review of problem gambling assessment instruments and brief screens. In:, Richards D, Blaszczynski A, Nower L, eds. Wiley-Blackwell handbook of disordered gambling. 165-203. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014.
16. Johnson EE, Hamer RM, Nora RM,. The Lie/Bet Questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers: A follow-up study. Psychol Reports 1998; 83: 1219-1224.
17. Petry NM, Blanco C, Stinchfield R, et al., An empirical evaluation of proposed changes for gambling diagnosis in the DSM-5. Addiction 2013; 108: 575-581.
18. Petry NM, Blanco C, Auriacombe M, et al., An overview of and rationale for changes proposed for pathological gambling in DSM-5. J Gambl Stud 2014; 30: 493-502.
19. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
20. Petry NM, Blanco C, Jin C, et al., Concordance between gambling disorder diagnoses in the DSM-IV and DSM-5: Results from the National Epidemiological Survey of Alcohol and Related Disorders. Psychol Addict Behav 2014; 28: 586-591.
21. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
22. Gerstein D, Volberg R, Harwood H,. Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the National gambling impact study commission. Chicago, IL: National opinion research center at the University of Chicago; 1999.
23. Williams RJ, Volberg RA,. Best practices in the population assessment of problem gambling. Guelph, Ontario, CA: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; 2010.
24. Zhu W, Zeng N, Wang N,. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, associated confidence interval and ROC analysis with practical SAS implementations. NorthEast SAS users group, health care and life sciences 2010; 1-9.
25. Delong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL,. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837-845.
26. Sanghyuk S,. ROC analysis for the evaluation of continuous biomarkers: Existing tools and new features in SAS® 9.2. The pharmaceutical Industry SAS User Group 2009; 4-6.
27. Allison P,. Logistic Regression Using SAS: Theory and Application, Second Edition. SAS Institute Inc 2012; 79-80.
28. Glascoe FP,. Screening for developmental and behavioral problems. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2005; 11: 173-179.
29. DiStefano C, Morgan G,. Examining classification criteria: A comparison of three cut score methods. Psychol Assess 2011; 23: 354-363.
30. Shepherd RM,. Clinical obstacles in administrating the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a methadone and alcohol clinic. J Gambl Stud 1996; 12: 21-32.
31. Spunt B,. Pathological gambling and substance misuse. Subst Use Misuse 2002; 37: 1299-1304.
32. Barnes GM,. Gambling on the lottery: Sociodemographic correlates across the lifespan. J Gambl Stud 2011; 27: 575-586.
33. Feigelman W,. Pathological gambling among methadone patients. Drug Alcohol Depend 1995; 39: 75-81.
34. Ladd GT, Petry NM,. A comparison of pathological gamblers with and without substance abuse treatment histories. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2003; 11: 202-209.
35. Shinogle J, Norris DF, Park D, et al., Gambling prevalence in Maryland: A baseline analysis. Baltimore, MD: Maryland Institute for Policy Analysis and Research; 2011.