DEA for non-homogenous parallel networks

Omega (United Kingdom)

Volumn 56, Issue , 2015, Pages 122-132

  Du, Juan ^a   Chen, Yao ^b,c   Huo, Jiazhen ^a  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NANJING AUDIT UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL   (United States)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Efficiency; Network; Non homogeneous sub units

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

CLASSIFIEDS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSE; INPUT AND OUTPUTS; NETWORK; NON-HOMOGENEOUS; NON-HOMOGENEOUS SUB-UNIT; PARALLEL NETWORK; PERFORMANCE METRICES; PRACTICE SYSTEMS; SUB-UNITS;

EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84937968620     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cook W.D., Tone K., Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis: prior to choosing a model. Omega 2014, 44:1-4.
2. Matthews K. Risk management and managerial efficiency in Chinese banks: a network DEA framework. Omega 2013, 41(2):207-215.
3. Huang C.-W., Ho F.N., Chiu Y.-H. Measurement of tourist hotels' productive efficiency, occupancy, and catering service effectiveness using a modified two-stage DEA model in Taiwan. Omega 2014, 48:49-59.
4. Premachandra I.M., Chen Y., Watson J. DEA as a tool for predicting corporate failure and success: a case of bankruptcy assessments. Omega 2011, 39(6):620-626.
5. Kao C., Hwang S.N. Efficiency measurement for network systems: IT impact on firm performance. Decision Support Systems 2010, 48:437-446.
6. Seiford L.M., Zhu J. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science 1999, 45:1270-1288.
7. Sexton T.R., Lewis H.F., Two-stage D.E.A. An application to major league baseball. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2003, 19:227-249.
8. Lewis H.F., Sexton T.R. Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Computers and Operations Research 2004, 31:1365-1410.
9. Kao C., Hwang S.N. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research 2008, 185:418-429.
10. Liang L., Cook W.D., Zhu J. DEA models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics 2008, 55:643-653.
11. Chen Y., Cook W.D., Li N., Zhu J. Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 196:1170-1176.
12. Cook W.D., Zhu J., Bi G.B., Yang F. Network DEA: additive efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 207:1122-1129.
13. Cook W.D., Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis: a handbook of modeling internal structures and networks 2014, Springer, New York.
14. Kao C. Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 196:1107-1112.
15. Beasley J.E. Determining teaching and research efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1995, 46:441-452.
16. Castelli L., Presenti R., Ukovich W. A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the decision making units is considered. Annals of Operations Research 2010, 173:207-235.
17. Castelli L., Pesenti R., Ukovich W. DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units. European Journal of Operational Research 2004, 154:465-476.
18. Castelli L., Pesenti R., Ukovich W. DEA-like models for efficiency evaluations of specialized and interdependent units. European Journal of Operational Research 2001, 132:274-286.
19. Cook W.D., Harrison J., Imanirad R., Rouse P., Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis with non-homogeneous DMUs. Operations Research 2013, 61:666-676.
20. Imanirad R., Cook W.D., Zhu J. Partial input to output impacts in DEA: production considerations and resource sharing among business subunits. Naval Research Logistics 2013, 60:190-207.
21. Tone K., Tsutsui M. Dynamic DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Omega 2010, 38:145-156.
22. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2:429-444.
23. Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Programming with linear fractional functional. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 1962, 15:333-334.
24. Thompson R.G., Langemeir L.N., Lee C., Lee E., Thrall R.M. The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics 1990, 46:93-108.
25. Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1984, 30:1078-1092.
26. Banker R.D., Morey R.C. The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1986, 32:1613-1627.
27. Cook W.D., Kress M., Seiford L.M. On the use of ordinal data in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1993, 44:133-140.
28. Cook W.D., Kress M., Seiford L.M. Data envelopment analysis in the presence of both quantitative and qualitative factors. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1996, 47:945-953.
29. Scheel H. Undesirable outputs in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 2001, 132:400-410.
30. Seiford L.M., Zhu J. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 142:16-20.