Stated preferences for size and bag limits of Alaska charter boat anglers

Marine Policy

Volumn 61, Issue , 2015, Pages 66-76

  Lew, Daniel K ^a,b   Larson, Douglas M ^b  

^a ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alaska; Fishing regulations; Recreational fishing; Stated preference methods

Indexed keywords

ANGLING; ECONOMIC IMPACT; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHING; FLATFISH; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; TRADE-OFF; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ALASKA; UNITED STATES;

HIPPOGLOSSUS STENOLEPIS;

EID: 84937931507     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson L.E., Lee S.T. Untangling the recreational value of wild and hatchery salmon. Mar. Resour. Econ. 2013, 28:175-197.
2. Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Ozdemiroglu E., Pearce D.W., Sugden R., Swanson J. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual 2002, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.
3. Beggs S., Cardell S., Hausman J. Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. J. Econom. 1981, 16:1-19.
4. Bockstael N.E., McConnell K.E. Environmental and Resource Valuation with Revealed Preferences: A Theoretical Guide to Empirical Models 2007, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
5. Carter D.W., Liese C. The economic value of catching and keeping or releasing saltwater sport fish in the Southeast USA. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 2012, 32:613-625.
6. Chapman R.G., Staelin R. Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. J. Mark. Res. 1982, 19(3):288-301.
7. Criddle K.R., Herrmann M., Lee S.T., Hamel C. Participation decisions, angler welfare, and the regional economic impact of sportfishing. Mar. Resour. Econ. 2003, 18:291-312.
8. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method 2007, John Wiley and Sons, New York. 2nd edition.
9. Dorow M., Beardmore B., Haider W., Arlinghaus R. Winners and losers of conservation policies for European eel, Anguilla anguilla: an economic welfare analysis for differently specialised eel anglers. J. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2010, 17:106-125.
10. Huber J., Zwerina K. The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. J. Mark. Res. 1996, 33(3):307-317.
11. Kanninen B.J. Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice 2006, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
12. Lawrence K.S. Assessing the value of recreational sea angling in South West England. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2005, 12:369-375.
13. Lew D.K., Larson D.M. Economic values for saltwater sport fishing in Alaska: a stated preference analysis. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 2012, 32(4):745-759.
14. Lew D.K., Larson D.M. Is a fish in hand worth two in the sea? Evidence from a stated preference study. Fish. Res. 2014, 157:124-135.
15. D.K. Lew, J. Lee, D.M. Larson, Saltwater Sportfishing in Alaska: A Summary and Description of the Alaska Saltwater Sportfishing Economic Survey, 2007, U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-214, 2010.
16. Lew, Daniel K., Gabriel Sampson, Amber Himes-Cornell, Jean Lee, and Brian Garber-Yonts. "Costs, Earnings, and Employment in the Alaska Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Sector, 2011-2013." U.S. Dept of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-2738, 2015, 134 p. Available at . http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/Publications/AFSC-TM/NOAA-TM-AFSC-299.pdf.
17. Louviere J.C., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
18. Massey M., Newbold S.C., Gentner B. Valuing water quality changes using a bioeconomic model of a coastal recreational fishery. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2006, 52:482-500.
19. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics 1973, 105-142. Academic Press, New York. P. Zaremba (Ed.).
20. Meyerhoff J., Morkbak M.R., Olsen S.B. A meta-study investigating the sources of protest behaviour in stated preference surveys. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2014, 58:35-57.
21. Mitchell R.C., Carson R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method 1989, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
22. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Regulatory Amendment for a Catch Sharing Plan for the Pacific Halibut Charter and Commercial Longline Sectors in International Pacific Halibut Commission Regulatory Areas 2C and 3A, Final Environmental Assessment, Regulatory Impact Review, Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, November 2013, 315 pages. http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/analyses/halibut/earirirfa_halibut_csp1113.pdf.
23. I.J. Stewart, S. Martell, Assessment of the Pacific Halibut Stock at the end of 2013, International Pacific Halibut Commission Report, 2014.
24. Train K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
25. Willis Gordon B. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design 2005, Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA.