Effects of molecular simulation parameters on predicting gas separation performance of ZIFs

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 90, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1707-1718

  Ozcan, Aydin ^a   Keskin, Seda ^a  

^a KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Adsorbent; Membrane; Molecular simulation; Separation; ZIFs

Indexed keywords

ADSORBENTS; ADSORPTION; GAS ADSORPTION; IONIZATION OF GASES; MEMBRANES; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; SEPARATION;

ADSORPTION SELECTIVITY; FORCE FIELD PARAMETERS; GAS ADSORPTION CAPACITY; GAS SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; MOLECULAR SIMULATIONS; PERMEATION SELECTIVITIES; SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; ZIFS;

GAS PERMEABLE MEMBRANES;

ADSORBENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZEOLITE; ZEOLITE IMIDAZOLATE NETWORK;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION; FORCE; GAS; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; PHASE SEPARATION; POROSITY; PURIFICATION; SIMULATION;

EID: 84937813940     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4482     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Isaeva VI and Kustov LM, Metal-organic frameworks-new materials for hydrogen storage. Russ J Gen Chem 77:721-739 (2007).
2. Mueller U, Schubert M, Teich F, Puetter H, Schierle-Arndt K and Pastre J, Metal-organic frameworks-prospective industrial applications. J Mater Chem 16:626-636 (2006).
3. Rowsell JLC and Yaghi OM, Metal-organic frameworks: a new class of porous materials. Micropor Mesopor Mater 73:3-14 (2004).
4. Yaghi OM, O'Keeffe M, Ockwig NW, Chae HK, Eddaoudi M and Kim J, Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials. Nature 423:705-714 (2003).
5. Huang K, Liu S, Li Q and Jin W, Preparation of novel metal-carboxylate system MOF membrane for gas separation. Sep Purif Technol 119:94-101 (2013).
6. Liu Y, Ng Z, Khan EA, Jeong H-K, Ching C-B and Lai Z, Synthesis of continuous MOF-5 membranes on porous α-alumina substrates. Micropor Mesopor Mater 118:296-301 (2009).
7. 4 separation. J Mater Chem A 2:1239-1241 (2014).
8. 0.5 membranes and composites: a molecular simulation study. J Phys Chem C 115:13637-13644 (2011).
9. Ramsahye NA, Trens P, Shepherd C, Gonzalez P, Trung TK, Ragon F and Serre C, The effect of pore shape on hydrocarbon selectivity on UiO-66(Zr), HKUST-1 and MIL-125(Ti) metal organic frameworks: insights from molecular simulations and chromatography. Micropor Mesopor Mater 189:222-231 (2014).
10. Xiao J, Hu M, Bénard P and Chahine R, Simulation of hydrogen storage tank packed with metal-organic framework. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:13000-13010 (2013).
11. Hayashi H, Cote AP, Furukawa H, O'Keeffe M and Yaghi OM, Zeolite A imidazolate frameworks. Nat Mater 6:501-506 (2007).
12. 2 on zeolitic imidazolate frameworks: experiments and simulations. Chem Eur J 16:1560-1571 (2010).
13. Morris W, Doonan CJ, Furukawa H, Banerjee R and Yaghi OM, Crystals as molecules: postsynthesis covalent functionalization of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 130:12626-12627 (2008).
14. Phan A, Doonan CJ, Uribe-Romo FJ, Knobler CB, O'Keeffe M and Yaghi OM, Synthesis, structure, and carbon dioxide capture properties of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Accounts Chem Res 43:58-67 (2009).
15. Peng X and Cao D, Computational screening of porous carbons, zeolites, and metal organic frameworks for desulfurization and decarburization of biogas, natural gas, and flue gas. AIChE J 59:2928-2942 (2013).
16. 2 capture by metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 41:2308-2322 (2012).
17. Liu D, Zheng C, Yang Q and Zhong C, Understanding the adsorption and diffusion of carbon dioxide in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks: a molecular simulation study. J Phys Chem C C 113:5004-5009 (2009).
18. Rappe AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS, Goddard WA and Skiff WM, UFF a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 114:10024-10035 (1992).
19. 2 by ZIFs. J Phys Chem C 114:8515-8522 (2010).
20. Babarao R, Dai S and Jiang D-E, Effect of pore topology and accessibility on gas adsorption capacity in zeolitic-imidazolate frameworks: bringing molecular simulation close to experiment. J Phys Chem C 115:8126-8135 (2011).
21. Mayo SL, Olafson BD and Goddard WA, Dreiding: a generic force field for molecular simulations. J Phys Chem 94:8897-8909 (1990).
22. Sirjoosingh A, Alavi S and Woo TK, Grand-canonical monte carlo and molecular-dynamics simulations of carbon-dioxide and carbon-monoxide adsorption in zeolitic imidazolate framework materials. J Phys Chem C 114:2171-2178 (2010).
23. 2 in the zeolitic imidazolate frameworks ZIF-68 and ZIF-69. J Phys Chem C 114:13501-13508 (2010).
24. 4 gas adsorption in Zeolitic imidazolate framework-95 and -100: Ab initio based grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations. J Phys Chem C 117:24407-24416 (2013).
25. 4 adsorption and separation in ZIF-78 and ZIF-79. Molecular Simulat 37:1131-1142 (2011).
26. Rankin RB, Liu J, Kulkarni AD and Johnson JK, Adsorption and diffusion of light gases in ZIF-68 and ZIF70: a simulation study. J Phys Chem C 113:16906-16914 (2009).
27. Atci E and Keskin S, Understanding the potential of zeolite imidazolate framework membranes in gas separations using atomically detailed calculations. J Phys Chem C 116:15525-15537 (2012).
28. 2 capture. Science 319:939-943 (2008).
29. Düren T, Millange F, Férey G, Walton KS and Snurr RQ, Calculating geometric surface areas as a characterization tool for metal-organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C 111:15350-15356 (2007).
30. 2 separation. T J Phys Chem C 115:16425-16432 (2011).
31. Atci E and Keskin S, Atomically detailed models for transport of gas mixtures in ZIF membranes and ZIF/polymer composite membranes. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:3091-3100 (2012).
32. 2 in ZIF-8. J Membrane Sci 377:36-41 (2011).
33. Pantatosaki E, Jobic H, Kolokolov DI, Karmakar S, Biniwale R and Papadopoulos GK, Probing the hydrogen equilibrium and kinetics in zeolite imidazolate frameworks via molecular dynamics and quasi-elastic neutron scattering experiments. J Chem Phys 138:034706-034710 (2013).
34. Parkes MV, Staiger CL, Perry Iv JJ, Allendorf MD and Greathouse JA, Screening metal-organic frameworks for selective noble gas adsorption in air: Effect of pore size and framework topology. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:9093-9106 (2013).
35. Dubbeldam D, Calero S, Vlugt TJH, Krishna R, Maesen TLM and Smit B, United atom force field for alkanes in nanoporous materials. J Phys Chem B 108:12301-12313 (2004).
36. Buch V, Path integral simulations of mixed Para-D2 and Ortho-D2 clusters: the orientational effects. J Chem Phys 100:7610-7629 (1994).
37. 2 on silicalite and NaZSM-5. Appl Surf Sci 120:81-84 (1997).
38. 2 separation: a fully atomistic simulation study. J Phys Chem C 116:19268-19277 (2012).
39. 4 in zeolite-like metal-organic frameworks with different extra-framework cations: a molecular simulation study. Molecular Simulat 38:72-83 (2011).
40. 2 capture. J Phys Chem C 117:5792-5799 (2013).
41. Potoff JJ and Siepmann JI, Vapor-liquid equilibria of mixtures containing alkanes, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen. AIChE J 47:1676-1682 (2001).
42. 2 mixtures in covalent organic frameworks: molecular simulations and theoretical predictions. J Phys Chem C 116:1772-1779 (2011).
43. 2 mixtures in a bio-mof material from molecular simulations. J Phys Chem C 115:6833-6840 (2011).
44. Bae Y-S and Snurr RQ, Development and evaluation of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:11586-11596 (2011).
45. Krishna R and van Baten JM, In silico screening of metal-organic frameworks in separation applications. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:10593-10616 (2011).
46. Keskin S and Sholl DS, Efficient methods for screening of metal organic framework membranes for gas separations using atomically detailed models. Langmuir 25:11786-11795 (2009).
47. Krishna R and Paschek D, Self-diffusivities in multicomponent mixtures in zeolites. Phys Chem Chem Phys 4:1891-1898 (2002).
48. Banerjee R, Furukawa H, Britt D, Knobler C, O'Keeffe M and Yaghi OM, Control of pore size and functionality in isoreticular zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and their carbon dioxide selective capture properties. J Am Chem Soc 131:3875-3877 (2009).
49. Ozturk TN and Keskin S, Predicting gas separation performances of porous coordination networks using atomistic simulations. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:17627-17639 (2013).
50. 2 selectivity of an amine-functionalized metal organic framework in adsorption-based and membrane-based gas separations. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:3462-3472 (2013).
51. 2/CO mixture. J Membrane Sci 353:36-40 (2010).
52. 2 separation. J Phys Chem C 117:18434-18440 (2013).
53. Accelrys Inc., Material Studio, 3.0v. Accelrys Inc. San Diego, CA (2003).
54. Breneman CM and Wiberg KB, Determining atom-centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis. J Comput Chem 11:361-373 (1990).
55. Xu Q and Zhong C, A general approach for estimating framework charges in metal-organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C 114:5035-5042 (2010).