Effective crowdsourcing for software feature ideation in online co-creation forums

Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE

Volumn 2013-January, Issue January, 2013, Pages 119-124

  Rajasekharan, Karthikeyan ^a   Mathur, Aditya P ^a   Ng, See Kiong ^a  

^a SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Co creation; Crowdsourcing; Expertise ranking; Ideation; Key users; Link analysis; Social network analysis; Software feature requirements

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

CO-CREATION; CROWDSOURCING; EXPERTISE RANKING; IDEATION; KEY USERS; LINK ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE FEATURES;

SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

EID: 84937711788     PISSN: 23259000     EISSN: 23259086     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. MK Poetz and Martin Schreier. The value of crowdsourcing: can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation, 29(2):245-256, 2012.
2. Dahlander, Linus, Lars Frederiksen, and Francesco Rullani. "Online communities and open innovation." Industry and innovation 15.2 (2008): 115-123.
3. Clauset, Aaron, Cosma Rohilla Shalizi, and Mark EJ Newman. "Powerlaw distributions in empirical data." SIAM review 51.4 (2009): 661-703.
4. B. Bayus. Crowdsourcing and individual creativity over time: The detrimental effects of past success. Available at SSRN 1667101, 2010.
5. Mathieu Bastian, Sebastien Heymann, and M Jacomy. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 361-362, 2009.
6. Ulrik Brandes. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(1994):163-177, 2001.
7. Julia Heidemann, Mathias Klier, and Florian Probst. Identifying key users in online social networks: A PageRank based approach. Information Systems Journal, 4801(December):12-15, 2010.
8. XL Li, C Foo, K Tew, and SK Ng. Searching for rising stars in bibliography networks. In Database Systems for Advanced Applications, pages 288-292, 2009.
9. KR Lakhani and Eric Von Hippel. How open source software works:free user-to-user assistance. Research policy, 32(July 2002):923-943, 2003.
10. Leskovec, Jure, et al. "Community structure in large networks: Natural cluster sizes and the absence of large well-defined clusters." Internet Mathematics 6.1 (2009): 29-123.
11. L Page, S Brin, R Motwani, and T Winograd. The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. pages 1-17, 1999.
12. E. Prandelli, M. Swahney, and G. Verona. Collaborating with customers to innovate: conceiving and marketing products in the networking age. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008.
13. Anna Stahlbrost and Birgitta Bergvall-Kareborn. Exploring users motivation in innovation communities. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 14(4):298-314, 2011.
14. KK Nam, MS Ackerman, and LA Adamic. Questions in, knowledge in?: A study of naver's question answering community. Human Factors, pages 779-788, 2009.
15. Jun Zhang, MS Ackerman, and L Adamic. Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 221-230, 2007.
16. Freeman, Linton. "A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness". Sociometry, 40: (1977):35-41.
17. Stanford Network Analysis Project, http://snap.stanford.edu/index.html.
18. Palla, Gergely, Imre Derényi, Illés Farkas, and Tamás Vicsek. "Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society." Nature 435, no. 7043 (2005): 814-818.