On growth measurements of abdominal aortic aneurysms using maximally inscribed spheres

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 683-691

  Gharahi, H ^a   Zambrano, B A ^a   Lim, C ^b   Choi, J ^a   Lee, W ^c   Baek, S ^a  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Aneurysms; Exponential growth; Korean patients; Orthogonal diameter

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; GROWTH RATE; VOLUME MEASUREMENT;

ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS; ANEURYSMS; DIAMETER MEASUREMENT; EXPONENTIAL GROWTH; GROWTH MEASUREMENT; KOREAN PATIENTS; ORTHOGONAL DIAMETER; PREDICTION CAPABILITY;

SPHERES;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; GROWTH RATE; HUMAN; INSCRIBED SPHERICAL DIAMETER METHOD; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MEASUREMENT; MIDDLE AGED; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ABDOMINAL AORTA; AORTOGRAPHY; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ORGAN SIZE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SOUTH KOREA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; UNCERTAINTY; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTOGRAPHY; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; ORGAN SIZE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84937634956     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: 18734030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Doyle B.J., Callanan A., Burke P.E., Grace P.A., Walsh M.T., Vorp D.A., et al. Vessel asymmetry as an additional diagnostic tool in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2009, 49:443-454.
2. Kleinstreuer C., Li Z Analysis and computer program for rupture-risk prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomed Eng OnLine 2006, 5:19-32.
3. Vande Geest J.P., Wang D.H.J., Wisniewski S.R., Makaroun M.S., Vorp D.A. Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 2006, 34:1098-1106.
4. Lederle F.A., Wilson S.E., Johnson G.R., Reinke D.B., Littooy F.N., Acher C.W., et al. Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal aortic aneurysm detection and management veterans administration cooperative study group. J Vasc Surg 1995, 21:945-952.
5. Lederle F.A., Wilson S.E., Johnson G.R., Reinke D.B., Littooy F.N., Acher C.W., et al. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:1437-1444.
6. Lederle F.A., Johnson G.R., Wilson S.E., Ballard D.J., Jordan W.D., Blebea J., et al. Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. J Am Med Assoc 2002, 287:2968-2972.
7. Brown P.M., Zelt D.T., Sobolev B. The risk of rupture in untreated aneurysms: the impact of size, gender, and expansion rate. J Vasc Surg 2003, 37:280-284.
8. Nevitt M.P., Ballard D.J., Hallett J.W. Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 1989, 321:1009-1014.
9. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:1445-1452.
10. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Lancet 1998, 352:1649-1655.
11. Abada H.T., Sapoval M.R., Paul J.F., de Maertelaer V, Mousseaux E., Gaux J.C. Aneurysmal sizing after endovascular repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: interobserver variability of various measurement protocols and its clinical relevance. Eur Radiol 2003, 13:2699-2704.
12. Kontopodis N., Metaxa E., Gionis M., Papaharilaou Y., Ioannou C.V. Discrepancies in determination of abdominal aortic aneurysms maximum diameter and growth rate, using axial and orthogonal computed tomography measurements. Eur J Radiol 2013, 82:1398-1403.
13. Dugas A., Therasse E., Kauffmann C., Tang A., Elkouri S., Nozza A., et al. Reproducibility of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurement and growth evaluation on axial and multiplanar computed tomography reformations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012, 35:779-787.
14. Long A., Rouet L., Lindholt J.S., Allaire E. Measuring the maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysms: review and critical analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012, 43:515-524.
15. Limet R., Sakalihassan N., Albert A. Determination of the expansion rate and incidence of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1991, 14:540-548.
16. Martufi G., Auer M., Roy J., Swedenborg J., Sakalihasan N., Panuccio G., et al. Multidimensional growth measurements of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2013, 58:748-755.
17. Darling R.C. Ruptured arteriosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysms: a pathologic and clinical study. Am J Surg 1970, 119:397-401.
18. Wever J.J., Blankensteijn J.D., Th M., Mali W.P., Eikelboom B.C. Maximal aneurysm diameter follow-up is inadequate after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000, 20:177-182.
19. Nicholls S.C., Gardner J.B., Meissner M.H., Johansen K.H. Rupture in small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1998, 28:884-888.
20. Schewe C.K., Schweikart H.P., Hammel G., Spengel F.A., Zöllner N., Zoller W.G. Influence of selective management on the prognosis and the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Clin Investig 1994, 72:585-591.
21. Cronenwett J.L., Murphy T.F., Zelenock G.B., Whitehouse W.M.Jr, Lindenauer S.M., Graham L.M., et al. Actuarial analysis of variables associated with rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surgery 1998, 98:472-483.
22. Forbes T.L., Lawlor D.K., DeRose G., Harris K.A. Gender differences in relative dilatation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2006, 20:564-568.
23. Hatakeyama T., Shigematsu H., Muto T. Risk factors for rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm based on three-dimensional study. J Vasc Surg 2001, 33:453-461.
24. Baumueller S., Nguyen T.D.L., Goetti R.P., Lachat M., Seifert B., Pfammatter T., et al. Maximum diameter measurements of aortic aneurysms on axial CT images after endovascular aneurysm repair: sufficient for follow-up?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011, 34:1182-1189.
25. Van Prehn J., van der Wal M.B.A., Vincken K., Bartels L.W., Moll F.L., van Herwaarden J.A. Intra- and interobserver variability of aortic aneurysm volume measurement with fast CTA postprocessing software. J Endovasc Ther 2008, 15:504-510.
26. Raghavan M.L., Vorp D.A., Federle M.P., Makaroun M.S., Webster M.W. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2000, 31:760-769.
27. Vega de Céniga M., Gómez R., Estallo L., Rodríguez L., Baquer M., Barba A Growth rate and associated factors in small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006, 31:231-236.
28. Hirose Y., Hamada S., Takamiya M. Predicting the growth of aortic aneurysms: a comparison of linear vs exponential models. Angiology 1995, 46:413-419.
29. Grimshaw G.M., Thompson J.M. The abnormal aorta: a statistical definition and strategy for monitoring change. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995, 10:95-100.
30. Vardulaki K.A., Prevost T.C., Walker N.M., Day N.E., Wilmink A.B.M., Quick C.R.G., et al. Growth rates and risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg 1998, 85:1674-1680.
31. Antiga L., Steinman D.A. Robust and objective decomposition and mapping of bifurcating vessels. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004, 23:704-713.
32. Dey T.K., Zhao W. Approximate medial axis as a Voronoi subcomplex. Comput-Aided Des 2004, 36:195-202.
33. Antiga L., Piccinelli M., Botti L., Ene-Iordache B., Remuzzi A., Steinman D.A. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008, 46:1097-1112.
34. Dupay A.C. Investigation of surface evolution for abdominal aortic aneurysms interacting with surrounding tissues. [Master's thesis] 2012, Michigan State University.
35. Ijaz A. Truncated Gaussian process regression for predicting growth of abdominal aortic aneurysm and for temporal modeling of sentiments. [Master's thesis] 2013, Michigan State University.
36. Dillavou E.D., Buck D.G., Muluk S.C., Makaroun M.S. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional CT scan for aortic measurement. J Endovasc Ther 2003, 10:531-538.
37. Chang J.B., Stein T.A., Liu J.P., Dunn M.E. Risk factors associated with rapid growth of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surgery 1997, 121:117-122.
38. Helderman F., Manoch I.J., Breeuwer M., Kose U., Boersma H., van Sambeek M.R.H.M., et al. Predicting patient-specific expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010, 40:47-53.