Predicting patient-specific expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 47-53

  Helderman, F ^a,b   ManochI J , ^a   Breeuwer, ^c   Kose, U ^c   Boersma, H ^a   Van Sambeek, M R H M ^d   PattynamaP M T , ^a   SchoutenO , ^a   Poldermans, D ^a   WisselinkW , ^b   Van Der Steen, A F W ^a   Krams, R ^e  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^d CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^e IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Mechanical stress; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AGED; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SCREENING TEST; VALIDITY; WALL STRESS;

EID: 77954310099     PISSN: 10785884     EISSN: 15322165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Fleming C, Whitlock EP, Beil TL, Lederle FA. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: A best-evidence systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2005 Feb 1;142(3):203-11.
2. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Ballard DJ, Jordan Jr WD, Blebea J, et al. Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. JAMA 2002 Jun 12;287(22):2968-72.
3. Brown LC, Powell JT. Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance. UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Ann Surg 1999 Sep;230(3):289-96.
4. Fillinger MF, Marra SP, Raghavan ML, Kennedy FE. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: Wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg 2003 Apr;37(4):724-32.
5. Kleinstreuer C, Li Z. Analysis and computer program for rupture-risk prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysms 8. Biomed Eng Online 2006;5:19.
6. Groenink M, Langerak SE, Vanbavel E, van der Wall EE, Mulder BJ, van der Wal AC, et al. The influence of aging and aortic stiffness on permanent dilation and breaking stress of the thoracic descending aorta. Cardiovasc Res 1999 Aug 1;43(2): 471-80.
7. Vande Geest JP, Di Martino ES, Bohra A, Makaroun MS, Vorp DA. A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment: Demonstrative application. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006 Nov;1085:11-21.
8. Vorp DA, Vande Geest JP. Biomechanical determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005 Aug;25(8):1558-66.
9. Brady AR, Thompson SG, Fowkes FG, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT. Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: Risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation 2004 Jul 6;110(1):16-21.
10. Mofidi R, Goldie VJ, Kelman J, Dawson AR, Murie JA, Chalmers RT. Influence of sex on expansion rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms 1. Br J Surg 2007 Mar;94(3):310-4.
11. Helderman F, Manoch IJ, Breeuwer M, Kose U, Schouten O, van Sambeek MR, et al. A numerical model to predict abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion based on local wall stress and stiffness. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008 Nov;46(11):1121-7.
12. de Putter S, Wolters BJ, Rutten MC, Breeuwer M, Gerritsen FA, van d V. Patient-specific initial wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms with a backward incremental method. J Biomech 2007;40(5):1081-90.
13. Gijsen FJ, Palmen DE, van der Beek MH, van d V, van Dongen ME, Janssen JD. Analysis of the axial flow field in stenosed carotid artery bifurcation modelseLDA experiments. J Biomech 1996 Nov;29(11):1483-9.
14. Gijsen FJ, van d V, Janssen JD. Wall shear stress in backwardfacing step flow of a red blood cell suspension. Biorheology 1998 Jul;35(4-5):263-79.
15. van de Vosse FN, Van Steenhoven AA, Janssen JD, Reneman RS. A two-dimensional numerical analysis of unsteady flow in the carotid artery bifurcation. A comparison with threedimensional in-vitro measurements and the influence of minor stenoses. Biorheology 1990;27(2):163-89.
16. Fillinger MF, Raghavan ML, Marra SP, Cronenwett JL, Kennedy FE. In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. J Vasc Surg 2002 Sep; 36(3):589-97.
17. Gasser TC, Gorgulu G, Folkesson M, Swedenborg J. Failure properties of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm under static and pulsating mechanical loads. J Vasc Surg 2008 Jul;48(1):179-88.
18. Schouten O, van Laanen JH, Boersma E, Vidakovic R, Feringa HH, Dunkelgrun M, et al. Statins are associated with a reduced infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm growth. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006 Jul;32(1):21-6.
19. Wang DH, Makaroun MS, Webster MW, Vorp DA. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm 2. J Vasc Surg 2002 Sep;36(3): 598-604.
20. Speelman L, Schurink GW, Bosboom EM, Buth J, Breeuwer M, van d V, et al. The mechanical role of thrombus on the growth rate of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). J Vasc Surg; 2009 Nov 26.
21. Li C, Xu Q. Mechanical stress-initiated signal transductions in vascular smooth muscle cells. Cell Signal 2000 Jul;12(7):435-45.
22. Matheson LA, Maksym GN, Santerre JP, Labow RS. Cyclic biaxial strain affects U937 macrophage-like morphology and enzymatic activities. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006 Jan;76(1):52-62.
23. Takemura M, Itoh H, Sagawa N, Yura S, Korita D, Kakui K, et al. Cyclic mechanical stretch augments both interleukin-8 and monocyte chemotactic protein-3 production in the cultured human uterine cervical fibroblast cells. Mol Hum Reprod 2004 Aug;10(8):573-80.