Semantic compositionality in tree kernels

CIKM 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1029-1038

  Annesi, Paolo ^a   Croce, Danilo ^a   Basili, Roberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); FORESTRY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; TEXT MINING;

COMPOSITIONAL SEMANTICS; DISTRIBUTIONAL SEMANTICS; FEATURE ENGINEERINGS; KERNEL-BASED LEARNING; PARAPHRASE IDENTIFICATIONS; QUESTION CLASSIFICATION; STATE-OF-THE-ART PERFORMANCE; SYNTACTIC SIMILARITIES;

SEMANTICS;

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 84937605047     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2661829.2661955     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. P. Annesi, V. Storch, and R. Basili. Space projections as distributional models for semantic composition. In In Proceedings of CICLing 2012, volume 7181 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 323-335. Springer, 2012.
2. M. Baroni, S. Bernardini, A. Ferraresi, and E. Zanchetta. The wacky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation, 43(3):209-226, 2009.
3. M. Baroni and A. Lenci. Distributional memory: A general framework for corpus-based semantics. Computational Linguistics, 36(4):673-721, 2010.
4. W. Blacoe and M. Lapata. A comparison of vector-based representations for semantic composition. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, EMNLP-CoNLL '12, pages 546-556, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2012. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. M. Collins and N. Duffy. Convolution kernels for natural language. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pages 625-632, 2001.
6. A. Copestake, D. Flickinger, C. Pollard, and I. Sag. Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction. Research on Language & Computation, 3(2-3):281-332, Dec. 2005.
7. D. Croce, P. Annesi, V. Storch, and R. Basili. Unitor: Combining semantic text similarity functions through sv regression. In Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics-Volume 1: Proceedings of the main conference and the shared task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 597-602. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012.
8. D. Croce, S. Filice, and R. Basili. Distributional models and lexical semantics in convolution kernels. In CICLing (1), pages 336-348, 2012.
9. D. Croce, A. Moschitti, and R. Basili. Structured lexical similarity via convolution kernels on dependency trees. In Proceedings of EMNLP, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK., 2011.
10. B. Dolan, C. Quirk, and C. Brockett. Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: Exploiting massively parallel news sources. In COLING, 2004.
11. K. Erk and S. Pado. A structured vector space model for word meaning in context. In EMNLP '08: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 897-906. ACL, 2008.
12. A. Finch, Y. S. Hwang, and E. Sumita. Using machine translation evaluation techniques to determine sentence-level semantic equivalence. In IWP2005, 2005.
13. P. Foltz, W. Kintsch, and T. Landauer. The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25:285-307, 1998.
14. E. Grefenstette and M. Sadrzadeh. Experimental support for a categorical compositional distributional model of meaning. In EMNLP, pages 1394-1404. ACL, 2011.
15. E. Guevara. A regression model of adjective-noun compositionality in distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the GEMS '10, pages 33-37, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2010. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. D. Haussler. Convolution kernels on discrete structures. Technical report, Dept. of Computer Science, University of California at Santa Cruz, 1999.
17. E. Hovy, L. Gerber, U. Hermjakob, C.-Y. Lin, and D. Ravichandran. Toward semantics-based answer pinpointing. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, HLT '01, pages 1-7, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2001. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. P. Jiang, C. Zhang, H. Fu, Z. Niu, and Q. Yang. An approach based on tree kernels for opinion mining of online product reviews. In Data Mining (ICDM), 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on, pages 256-265, Dec 2010.
19. T. Joachims. Estimating the generalization performance of an SVM efficiently. In Proceedings of ICML'00, pages 431-438, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2000.
20. W. Kintsch. Predication. Cognitive Science, 25(2):173-202, 2001.
21. T. Landauer and S. Dumais. A solution to platoâəźs problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological review, pages 211-240, 1997.
22. X. Li and D. Roth. Learning question classifiers. In Proceedings of ACL '02, COLING '02, pages 1-7, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2002. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. R. Mihalcea, C. Corley, and C. Strapparava. Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1, AAAI'06, pages 775-780. AAAI Press, 2006.
24. J. Mitchell and M. Lapata. Vector-based models of semantic composition. In In Proceedings of ACL/HLT 2008, pages 236-244, 2008.
25. J. Mitchell and M. Lapata. Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive Science, 34(8):1388-1429, 2010.
26. A. Moschitti. Kernel methods, syntax and semantics for relational text categorization. In ECML, pages 318-329, Berlin, Germany, September 2008. Machine Learning: ECML 2006, 17th European Conference on Machine Learning, Proceedings.
27. A. Moschitti, S. Quarteroni, R. Basili, and S. Manandhar. Exploiting syntactic and shallow semantic kernels for question answer classification. In ACL. The Association for Computer Linguistics, 2007.
28. S. Pado and M. Lapata. Dependency-based construction of semantic space models. Computational Linguistics, 33(2), 2007.
29. M. Sahlgren. The Word-Space Model. PhD thesis, Stockholm University, 2006.
30. H. Schütze. Automatic word sense discrimination. Comput. Linguist., 24(1):97-123, Mar. 1998.
31. P. Smolensky. Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems. Artif. Intell., 46:159-216, November 1990.
32. R. Socher, J. Bauer, C. D. Manning, and N. Andrew Y. Parsing with compositional vector grammars. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 455-465, Sofia, Bulgaria, August 2013. Association for Computational Linguistics.
33. R. Socher, E. H. Huang, J. Pennington, A. Y. Ng, and C. D. Manning. Dynamic pooling and unfolding recursive autoencoders for paraphrase detection. In J. Shawe-Taylor, R. S. Zemel, P. L. Bartlett, F. C. N. Pereira, and K. Q. Weinberger, editors, NIPS, pages 801-809, 2011.
34. S. Srivastava, D. Hovy, and E. H. Hovy. A walk-based semantically enriched tree kernel over distributed word representations. In EMNLP, pages 1411-1416, 2013.
35. P. D. Turney and P. Pantel. From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of artificial intelligence research, 37:141, 2010.
36. E. M. Voorhees. Overview of the TREC 2001 question answering track. In TREC, 2001.
37. F. M. Zanzotto, I. Korkontzelos, F. Fallucchi, and S. Manandhar. Estimating linear models for compositional distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING '10, pages 1263-1271, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2010. Association for Computational Linguistics.