Next-generation re-sequencing as a tool for rapid bioinformatic screening of presence and absence of genes and accessory chromosomes across isolates of Zymoseptoria tritici

Fungal Genetics and Biology

Volumn 79, Issue , 2015, Pages 71-75

  McDonald, Megan C ^a   Williams, Angela H ^b   Milgate, Andrew ^c   Pattemore, Julie A ^d   Solomon, Peter S ^a   Hane, James K ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c NSW DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

^d CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accessory chromosome; Comparative genomics; Next generation sequencing; Presence absence variation; Zymoseptoria tritici

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENOME; FUNGUS ISOLATION; GENE DELETION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC SCREENING; NEXT GENERATION RESEQUENCING; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; PATHOGENICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SUPERNUMERARY CHROMOSOME; WHEAT; ZYMOSEPTORIA TRITICI; ASCOMYCETES; BIOLOGY; CHROMOSOME; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

ASCOMYCOTA; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENES, FUNGAL; GENETIC TESTING; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING;

EID: 84937564837     PISSN: 10871845     EISSN: 10960937     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Altschul S.F., et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215:403-410.
2. Bankevich A., et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19:455-477.
3. Brunner P.C., et al. Coevolution and life cycle specialization of plant cell wall degrading enzymes in a hemibiotrophic pathogen. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30:1337-1347.
4. Camacho C., et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:421.
5. Coleman J.J., et al. The genome of Nectria haematococca: contribution of supernumerary chromosomes to gene expansion. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000618.
6. Croll D., McDonald B.A. The accessory genome as a cradle for adaptive evolution in pathogens. PLoS Pathogens 2012, 8:e1002608.
7. Croll D., et al. Breakage-fusion-bridge cycles and large insertions contribute to the rapid evolution of accessory chromosomes in a fungal pathogen. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003567.
8. DePristo M.A., et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:491-498.
9. Dhillon B., et al. The landscape of transposable elements in the finished genome of the fungal wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola. BMC Genomics 2014, 15:1132.
10. Goodwin S.B., et al. Finished genome of the fungal wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola reveals dispensome structure, chromosome plasticity, and stealth pathogenesis. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002070.
11. Grigoriev I.V. A changing landscape of fungal genomics. Ecological Genomics of Fungi 2013, 1-20. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
12. Grigoriev I.V., et al. MycoCosm portal: gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes. Nucl. Acids Res. 2013, gkt1183.
13. Jurka J., et al. Repetitive elements: bioinformatic identification, classification and analysis. eLS 2011.
14. Kellner R., et al. Expression profiling of the wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici reveals genomic patterns of transcription and host-specific regulatory programs. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 6:1353-1365.
15. Kersey P.J., et al. Ensembl genomes 2013: scaling up access to genome-wide data. Nucl. Acids Res. 2014, 42:D546-D552.
16. Krzywinski M., et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19:1639-1645.
17. Langmead B., Salzberg S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:357-359.
18. Li H., et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2078-2079.
19. Ma L.J., et al. Comparative genomics reveals mobile pathogenicity chromosomes in Fusarium. Nature 2010, 464:367-373.
20. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 2011, 17:10-12.
21. McDonald M.C., et al. Recent advances in the Zymoseptoria tritici-wheat interaction: insights from pathogenomics. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6.
22. McKenna A., et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20:1297-1303.
23. Morais do Amaral A., et al. Defining the predicted protein secretome of the fungal wheat leaf pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola. PLoS One 2012, 7:e49904.
24. Perez-Nadales E., et al. Fungal model systems and the elucidation of pathogenicity determinants. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2014, 70:42-67.
25. Quinlan A.R., Hall I.M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:841-842.
26. Stukenbrock E.H., et al. Whole-genome and chromosome evolution associated with host adaptation and speciation of the wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001189.
27. Stukenbrock E.H., et al. The making of a new pathogen: insights from comparative population genomics of the domesticated wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola and its wild sister species. Genome Res. 2011, 21:2157-2166.
28. Testa A., Oliver R., Hane J. Overview of genomic and bioinformatic resources for Zymoseptoria tritici. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015, 79:13-16.
29. Torriani S.F., et al. Evolutionary history of the mitochondrial genome in Mycosphaerella populations infecting bread wheat, durum wheat and wild grasses. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2011, 58:192-197.
30. Van der Auwera G.A., et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr. Protocols Bioinformatics 2013, 11. 11 10 1-11 10 33.
31. Yang F., et al. Transcriptional reprogramming of wheat and the hemibiotrophic pathogen Septoria tritici during two phases of the compatible interaction. PLoS One 2013, 8:e81606.
32. Yang F., et al. Battle through signaling between wheat and the fungal pathogen Septoria tritici revealed by proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2013, 12:2497-2508.