Local configuration pattern features for age-related macular degeneration characterization and classification

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 63, Issue , 2015, Pages 208-218

  Mookiah, Muthu Rama Krishnan ^a   Acharya, U Rajendra ^a,b,c   Fujita, Hamido ^d   Koh, Joel E W ^a   Tan, Jen Hong ^a   Noronha, Kevin ^e   Bhandary, Sulatha V ^f   Chua, Chua Kuang ^a   Lim, Choo Min ^a   Laude, Augustinus ^g   Tong, Louis ^h,i,j,k  

^a DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING   (Singapore)

^b SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES   (Singapore)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^d IWATE PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e ST FRANCIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^f KASTURBA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^g NATIONAL HEALTHCARE GROUP EYE INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

^h SINGAPORE NATIONAL EYE CENTRE   (Singapore)

ⁱ SINGAPORE EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

^j DUKE NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Singapore)

^k NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

more..

Author keywords

Age related macular degeneration; Fundus imaging; Local configuration pattern; Retina; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

DECISION TREES; NEAREST NEIGHBOR SEARCH; NEURAL NETWORKS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION; CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION; FUNDUS IMAGING; LOCAL CONFIGURATIONS; PROBABILISTIC NEURAL NETWORKS; RETINA; RETINAL IMAGE ANALYSIS; SUPERVISED CLASSIFIERS;

DIAGNOSIS;

AGE RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BAYESIAN LEARNING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER MODEL; DECISION TREE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EYE FUNDUS; FUNDUS CAMERA; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LOCAL CONFIGURATION PATTERN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; FEMALE; MACULAR DEGENERATION; MALE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RETINA;

FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MACULAR DEGENERATION; MALE; RETINA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

EID: 84937555826     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: 18790534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.05.019     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. de Jong P.T. Age-related macular degeneration. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355(14):1474-1485.
2. Normando E.M., Tilley M., Guo L., Cordeiro M.F. Imaging in dry AMD. Drug Discov. Today: Ther. Strateg. 2013, 10(1):e35-e41.
3. Bartlett H., Eperjesi F. Use of fundus imaging in quantification of age-related macular change. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2007, 52(6):655-671.
4. M. Zarbin, D. Chu, Diagnostic and surgical techniques, Surv. Ophthalmol. 53 (5) (2008).
5. Chopdar A., Chakravarthy U., Verma D. Age related macular degeneration. Br. Med. J. 2003, 326(7387):485.
6. Evans J.R. Risk factors for age-related macular degeneration. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2001, 20(2):227-253.
7. Bhuiyan A., Xiao D., Yogesan K. A review of disease grading and remote diagnosis for sight threatening eye condition. age related macular degeneration. J. Comput. Sci. Syst. Biol. 2014, 7:62-71.
8. World Health Organization Fact Sheet no. 144. Blindness and Visual Disability. Part III of VII: Other Leading Causes Worldwide. 〈〉(accessed 04/11/2014). http://worldwide.www.who.int/inffs/en/fact144html.
9. United Nations the World Population Prospects: The 2000 revision. 〈〉(accessed 04/11/2014). http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2000/highlights.pdf.
10. Wong W.L., Su X., Li X., Cheung C.M.G., Klein R., Cheng C.-Y., Wong T.Y. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040. a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2014, 2(2):e106-e116.
11. Hijazi M.H.A., Coenen F., Zheng Y. Data mining techniques for the screening of age-related macular degeneration. Knowl. Based Syst. 2012, 29:83-92.
12. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group, et al., A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins c and e, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: Areds report no. 8, Arch. Ophthalmol. 119 (10) (2001) 1417.
13. M.H.A. Hijazi, F. Coenen, Y. Zheng, Retinal image classification using a histogram based approach, in: IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2010, pp. 3501-3507.
14. Mookiah M.R.K., Acharya U.R., Koh J.E.W., Chandran V., Chua C.K., Tan J.H., Lim C.M., Ng E.Y.K., Noronha K., Tong L., et al. Automated diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration using greyscale features from digital fundus images. Comput.Biol. Med. 2014, 53:55-64.
15. L. Brandon, A. Hoover, Drusen detection in a retinal image using multi-level analysis, in: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2003, Montreal, Canada, 2003, pp. 618-625.
16. BenSbeh Z., Cohen L.D., Mimoun G., Coscas G. A new approach of geodesic reconstruction for drusen segmentation in eye fundus images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2001, 20(12):1321-1333.
17. Rapantzikos K., Zervakis M., Balas K. Detection and segmentation of drusen deposits on human retina. potential in the diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration. Med. Image Anal. 2003, 7(1):95-108.
18. Niemeijer M., van Ginneken B., Russell S.R., Suttorp-Schulten M.S., Abramoff M.D. Automated detection and differentiation of drusen, exudates, and cotton-wool spots in digital color fundus photographs for diabetic retinopathy diagnosis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48(5):2260-2267.
19. P. Soliz, S. Russell, M. Abramoff, S. Murillo, M. Pattichis, H. Davis, Independent component analysis for vision-inspired classification of retinal images with age-related macular degeneration, in: IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation, 2008. SSIAI 2008, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, 2008, pp. 65-68.
20. E.S. Barriga, V. Murray, C. Agurto, M.S. Pattichis, S. Russell, M. Abramoff, H. Davis, P. Soliz, Multi-scale AM-FM for lesion phenotyping on age-related macular degeneration, in: 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2009. CBMS 2009, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 2009, pp. 1-5.
21. D.E. Freund, N. Bressler, P. Burlina, Automated detection of drusen in the macula, in: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2009. ISBI'09, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2009, pp. 61-64.
22. Z. Liang, D.W. Wong, J. Liu, K.L. Chan, T.Y. Wong, Towards automatic detection of age-related macular degeneration in retinal fundus images, in: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2010, pp. 4100-4103.
23. P. Burlina, D. Freund, B. Dupas, N. Bressler, Automatic screening of age-related macular degeneration and retinal abnormalities, in: 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2011, pp. 3962-3966.
24. H. Santos-Villalobos, T.P. Karnowski, D. Aykac, L. Giancardo, Y. Li, T. Nichols, K. Tobin, E. Chaum, Statistical characterization and segmentation of drusen in fundus images, in: 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2011, pp. 6236-6241.
25. Mora A.D., Vieira P.M., Manivannan A., Fonseca J.M. Automated drusen detection in retinal images using analytical modelling algorithms. Biomed. Eng. Online 2011, 10(1):59.
26. Quellec G., Russell S.R., Abramoff M.D. Optimal filter framework for automated, instantaneous detection of lesions in retinal images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2011, 30(2):523-533.
27. J. Cheng, D.W.K. Wong, X. Cheng, J. Liu, N.M. Tan, M. Bhargava, C.M.G. Cheung, T.Y. Wong, Early age-related macular degeneration detection by focal biologically inspired feature, in: 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA, 2012, pp. 2805-2808.
28. Köse C., Şevik U., Gençalioğlu O. Automatic segmentation of age-related macular degeneration in retinal fundus images. Comput. Biol. Med. 2008, 38(5):611-619.
29. Köse C., Şevik U., Gençalioğlu O., Ikibaş C., Kayikiçioğlu T. A statistical segmentation method for measuring age-related macular degeneration in retinal fundus images. J. Med. Syst. 2010, 34(1):1-13.
30. Hijazi M.H.A., Coenen F., Zheng Y. Data mining for AMD screening. a classification based approach. Int. J. Simul. Syst. Sci. Technol. 2015, 57-68.
31. Zheng Y., Hijazi M.H.A., Coenen F. Automated disease/no disease grading of age-related macular degeneration by an image mining approach. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53(13):8310-8318.
32. Agurto C., Barriga E.S., Murray V., Nemeth S., Crammer R., Bauman W., Zamora G., Pattichis M.S., Soliz P. Automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration in digital fundus images. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52(8):5862-5871.
33. Mookiah M.R.K., Acharya U.R., Koh J.E.W., Chua C.K., Tan J.H., Chandran V., Lim C.M., Noronha K., Laude A., Tong L. Decision support system for age-related macular degeneration using discrete wavelet transform. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2014, 52(9):781-796.
34. Pizer S.M., Amburn E.P., Austin J.D., Cromartie R., Geselowitz A., Greer T., ter Haar Romeny B., Zimmerman J.B., Zuiderveld K. Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 1987, 39(3):355-368.
35. Y. Guo, G. Zhao, M. Pietikäinen, Texture classification using a linear configuration model based descriptor, in: BMVC, Citeseer, 2011, pp. 1-10.
36. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group, et al., The age-related eye disease study system for classifying age-related macular degeneration from stereoscopic color fundus photographs: the age-related eye disease study report number 6, Am. J. Ophthalmol. 132 (5) (2001) 668-681.
37. Raffei A.F.M., Asmuni H., Hassan R., Othman R.M. A low lighting or contrast ratio visible iris recognition using iso-contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization. Knowl. Based Syst. 2015, 74:40-48.
38. Ramlugun G.S., Nagarajan V.K., Chakraborty C. Small retinal vessels extraction towards proliferative diabetic retinopathy screening. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39(1):1141-1146.
39. K. Zuiderveld, Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization, in: Graphics Gems IV, Academic Press Professional, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, 1994, pp. 474-485.
40. Antal B., Hajdu A. An ensemble-based system for microaneurysm detection and diabetic retinopathy grading. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 59(6):1720-1726.
41. Mookiah M.R.K., Faust O. Automated glaucoma detection using hybrid feature extraction in retinal fundus images. J. Mech. Med. Biol. 2013, 13(01):1350011.
42. Chowriappa P., Dua S., Acharya U.R., Mookiah M.R.K. Ensemble selection for feature-based classification of diabetic maculopathy images. Comput. Biol. Med. 2013, 43(12):2156-2162.
43. Mookiah M.R.K., Acharya U.R., Martis R.J., Chua C.K., Lim C.M., Ng E.Y.K., Laude A. Evolutionary algorithm based classifier parameter tuning for automatic diabetic retinopathy grading. a hybrid feature extraction approach. Knowl. Based Syst. 2013, 39:9-22.
44. Kwak J.T., Xu S., Wood B.J. Efficient data mining for local binary pattern in texture image analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 42(9):4529-4539.
45. Ojala T., Pietikainen M., Maenpaa T. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002, 24(7):971-987.
46. Roweis S.T., Saul L.K. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 2000, 290(5500):2323-2326.
47. You W., Yang Z., Ji G. PLS-based recursive feature elimination for high-dimensional small sample. Knowl. Based Syst. 2014, 55:15-28.
48. Galar M., Derrac J., Peralta D., Triguero I., Paternain D., Lopez-Molina C., Garcia S., Benitez J.M., Pagola M., Barrenechea E., et al. A survey of fingerprint classification Part I. taxonomies on feature extraction methods and learning models. Knowl. Based Syst. 2015, 81:76-97.
49. A.M. Gun, M.K. Gupta, B. Dasgupta, Fundamentals of Statistics (Vols. I and II), 4th Edition, 2008.
50. Safavian S., Landgrebe D. A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Transactions on Syst. Man Cybern. 1991, 21(3):660-674.
51. Gutierrez-Rodríguez A., Martínez-Trinidad J.F., García-Borroto M., Carrasco-Ochoa J. Mining patterns for clustering on numerical datasets using unsupervised decision trees. Knowl. Based Syst. 2015, 82:70-79.
52. P. Cunningham, S.J. Delany, k-Nearest neighbour classifiers, in: Multiple Classifier System, 2007, pp. 1-17.
53. Duda R.O., Hart P.E., Stork D.G. Pattern Classification 2012, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
54. Specht D.F. Probabilistic neural networks. Neural Netw. 1990, 3(1):109-118.
55. K. Singh, M. Xie, Bootstrap: A Statistical Method, Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University, USA. Retrieved from 〈〉. http://www.stat.rutgers.edu/home/mxie/RCPapers/bootstrap.pdf.
56. V. N. Vapnik, V. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory, vol. 1, Wiley, New York, 1998.
57. Zhao M., Chow T.W., Zhang Z., Li B. Automatic image annotation via compact graph based semi-supervised learning. Knowl. Based Syst. 2015, 76:148-165.
58. Tomar D., Agarwal S. A comparison on multi-class classification methods based on least squares twin support vector machine. Knowl. Based Syst. 2015, 81:131-147.
59. R. Kohavi, et al., A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection, in: IJCAI, vol. 14, 1995, pp. 1137-1145.
60. Lam L., Suen C.Y. Application of majority voting to pattern recognition. an analysis of its behavior and performance. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Hum. 1997, 27(5):553-568.
61. Bock R., Meier J., Nyúl L.G., Hornegger J., Michelson G. Glaucoma risk index. automated glaucoma detection from color fundus images. Med. Image Anal. 2010, 14(3):471-481.
62. Mookiah M.R.K., Acharya U.R., Chua C.K., Lim C.M., Ng E.Y.K., Laude A. Computer-aided diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. a review. Comput. Biol. Med. 2013, 43(12):2136-2155.
63. Haleem M.S., Han L., van Hemert J., Li B. Automatic extraction of retinal features from colour retinal images for glaucoma diagnosis. a review. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 2013, 37(7):581-596.