Aortic annulus and root characteristics in severe aortic stenosis due to bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valves: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapies

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2015, Pages E88-E98

  Philip, Femi ^a   Faza, Nadine Nadar ^a   Schoenhagen, Paul ^a   Desai, Milind Y ^a   Tuzcu, E Murat ^a   Svensson, Lars G ^a   Kapadia, Samir R ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

aortic valve disease; percutaneous intervention; percutaneous valve therapy; structural heart disease intervention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA ROOT; AORTA SINUS; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PERCUTANEOUS AORTIC VALVE; PREVALENCE; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRICUSPID AORTIC VALVE; TRICUSPID VALVE DISEASE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AORTA; AORTA VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; AORTOGRAPHY; COMPLICATION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; DEVICES; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RADIOGRAPHY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STENT; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTA; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; AORTOGRAPHY; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SINUS OF VALSALVA; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84937522105     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25948     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Zegdi R, Ciobotaru V, Noghin M,. Is it reasonable to treat all calcified stenotic aortic valves with a valved stent? Results from a human anatomic study in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 579-584.
2. Collins MJ, Butany J, Borger MA,. Implications of a congenitally abnormal valve: A study of 1025 consecutively excised aortic valves. J Clin Pathol 2008; 61: 530-536.
3. Hayashida K, Bouvier E, Lefevre T,. Impact of CT-guided valve sizing on post-procedural aortic regurgitation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention 2012; 8: 546-555.
4. Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J,. SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012; 6: 366-380.
5. Sievers HH, Schmidtke C,. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: 1226-1233.
6. Delgado V, Tops LF, Schuijf JD,. Successful deployment of a transcatheter aortic valve in bicuspid aortic stenosis: Role of imaging with multislice computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2: e12-13.
7. Chiam PT, Chao VT, Tan SY,. Percutaneous transcatheter heart valve implantation in a bicuspid aortic valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 559-561.
8. Ferrari E, Locca D, Sulzer C,. Successful transapical aortic valve implantation in a congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90: 630-632.
9. Wijesinghe N, Ye J, Rodes-Cabau J,. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 1122-1125.
10. Jilaihawi H, Asgar A, Bonan R,. Good outcome and valve function despite Medtronic-corevalve underexpansion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 1022-1025.
11. Raja Y, Holloway B, Doshi SN,. Symmetrical expansion of an Edwards sapien valve in a congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. Heart 2011; 97: 1113.
12. Kochman J, Huczek Z, Koltowski L,. Transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis in a female patient with severe bicuspid aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 112.
13. Baralis G, Di Gregorio O, Riva L,. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid aortic valve: Never say never. G Ital Cardiol (Rome) 2012; 13: 67-70.
14. Himbert D, Pontnau F, Messika-Zeitoun D,. Feasibility and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with stenotic bicuspid aortic valves. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110: 877-883.
15. Zegdi R, Blanchard D, Azarine A,. Elliptical shape of a SAPIEN XT prosthesis deployed in a patient with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 2012; 21: 764-766.
16. Maluenda G, Araya M, Ibanez-Arenas R., Successful transfemoral aortic valve replacement in a bicuspid aortic stenotic valve: Requirements for a safe implant. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv A 2013; 82: E826-E830.
17. Hayashida K, Bouvier E, Lefevre T,. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for patients with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 284-291.
18. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M,. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1597-1607.
19. Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Jilaihawi H,. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1696-1704.
20. Vahanian A, Iung B,. The new ESC/EACTS guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2012; 105: 465-467.
21. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ,. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2187-2198.
22. Roberts WC, Ko JM,. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation 2005; 111: 920-925.
23. Roberts WC, Janning KG, Ko JM,. Frequency of congenitally bicuspid aortic valves in patients ≥80 years of age undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis (with or without aortic regurgitation) and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2012; 109: 1632-1636.
24. Silver MA, Roberts WC,. Detailed anatomy of the normally functioning aortic valve in hearts of normal and increased weight. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 454-461.
25. Shibayama K, Harada K, Berdejo J,. Comparison of aortic root geometry with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve: Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014; 27: 1143-1152.
26. Bolen MA, Popovic ZB, Dahiya A,. Prospective ECG-triggered, axial 4-D imaging of the aortic root, valvular, and left ventricular structures: A lower radiation dose option for preprocedural TAVI imaging. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012; 6: 393-398.
27. Goel SS, Tuzcu EM, Agarwal S., Comparison of ascending aortic size in patients with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis treated with versus without a statin drug. Am J Cardiol 2011; 108: 1458-1462.