Moving innovation to practice: A committee opinion

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 39-42

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

conflict of interest; ethics; evidence based medicine; Experimental; innovation; research; technology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMBRYO RESEARCH; ETHICS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXPERIMENTATION; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FUNDING; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; LEARNING CURVE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT SAFETY; PEER REVIEW; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PUBLIC HEALTH INSURANCE; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; STUDY DESIGN; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCTION; STANDARDS; TRENDS;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE; THERAPIES, INVESTIGATIONAL;

EID: 84937521062     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research Fed Regist 44 1979 23192 23197 Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html Accessed April 9, 2015
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Innovative practice: ethical guidelines. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 352 Obstet Gynecol 108 2006 1589 1595
3. The Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Definition of experimental procedures: a committee opinion Fertil Steril 99 2013 1197 1198
4. Lasker Foundation The Lasker Forum on Ethical Challenges in Biomedical Research and Practice, May 14-16, 2003 2003 Lasker Foundation New York Available at: http://www.laskerfoundation.org/media/ethicissues.htm Accessed April 9, 2015
5. W. Dondorp, and G. de Wert Innovative reproductive technologies: risks and responsibilities Hum Reprod 26 2011 1604 1608
6. L.L. Wall, and D. Brown The perils of commercially driven surgical innovation Am J Obstet Gynecol 202 2010 30.e1 30.e4
7. Z. Alfirevic, D. Devane, and G.M. Gyte Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 CD006066
8. C. Sosa, F. Althabe, J. Belizan, and E. Bergel Bed rest in singleton pregnancies for preventing preterm birth Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004 CD003851
9. J. Harper, E. Coonen, M. De Rycke, F. Fiorentino, J. Geraedts, V. Goossens, and et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee Hum Reprod 25 2010 821 823
10. S. Mastenbroek, M. Twisk, F. van der Veen, and S. Repping Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs Hum Reprod Update 17 2011 454 466
11. L.F. Wong, T.F. Porter, and J.R. Scott Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 CD00012
12. S.L. Norris, H.K. Holmer, L.A. Ogden, and B.U. Burda Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review PLoS One 6 2011 e25153
13. E. Stamatakis, R. Weiler, and J.P. Ioannidis Undue industry influences that distort health care research, strategy, expenditure and practice: a review Eur J Clin Invest 43 2013 469 475
14. L. Bero Industry sponsorship and research outcome: a Cochrane review JAMA Intern Med 173 2013 580 581
15. A.W. Jørgensen, J. Hilden, and P.C. Gøtzsche Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review BMJ 333 2006 782
16. The Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline Fertil Steril 99 2013 37 43
17. W.A. Rogers, and J. Johnson Addressing within-role conflicts of interest in surgery J Bioeth Inq 10 2013 219 225
18. J.T. Breeden Statement on Robotic Surgery by ACOG President James T. Breeden, MD March 14, 2013 Available at: http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/News-Releases/2013/Statement-on-Robotic-Surgery/ Accessed April 9, 2015
19. E. Gates New surgical procedures: can our patients benefit while we learn? Am J Obstet Gynecol 176 1997 1293 1299
20. M.J. Hatlie Climbing 'the learning curve': new technologies, emerging obligations JAMA 270 1993 1364 1365
21. P. Healey, and A. Samanta When does the 'learning curve' of innovative interventions become questionable practice? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 253 2008 256
22. R. Sequeira, F. Weinbaum, J. Satterfield, J. Chassin, and L. Mock Credentialing physicians for new technology; the physician's learning curve must not harm the patient Am J Surg 60 1994 821 833
23. E. Trondsen, T.E. Ruud, B.H. Nilsen, R. Marvik, H.E. Murvold, T. Buanes, and et al. Complications during the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Norway Eur J Surg 160 1994 145 151
24. W.A. See, C.S. Cooper, and R.J. Fisher Predictors of laparoscopic complications after formal training in laparoscopic surgery JAMA 270 1993 2689 2692
25. D.J. Scott, C.M. Pugh, E.M. Ritter, L.M. Jacobs, C.A. Pellegrini, and A.K. Sachdeva New directions in simulation-based surgical education and training: validation and transfer of surgical skills, use of nonsurgeons as faculty, use of simulation to screen and select surgery residents, and long-term follow-up of learners Surgery 149 2011 735 744