Gait assessment using the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect: Concurrent validity and inter-day reliability of spatiotemporal and kinematic variables

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 48, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 2166-2170

  Mentiplay, Benjamin F ^a   Perraton, Luke G ^a   Bower, Kelly J ^a   Pua, Yong Hao ^b   McGaw, Rebekah ^a   Heywood, Sophie ^a   Clark, Ross A ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Gaming; Kinect for Windows; Kinect V2; Low cost technology; Physical function; Walking

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; CORRELATION METHODS; GAIT ANALYSIS; KINEMATICS; RELIABILITY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

GAMING; KINECT V2; LOW COST TECHNOLOGY; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; WALKING;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; FOOT SWING VELOCITY; GAIT; GAIT SPEED; GAIT VELOCITY; GAIT VELOCITY VARIABILITY; GROUND CONTACT; HIP FLEXION RANGE; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; PEAK KNEE ADDUCTION CONTACT; PEAK KNEE FLEXION CONTACT; PEAK KNEE FLEXION SWING; PELVIS ANTERIOR POSTERIOR RANGE; PELVIS MEDIAL LATERAL RANGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STEP LENGTH; STEP TIME; STEP WIDTH; TOE OFF; TOTAL ANKLE FLEXION RANGE; WALKING SPEED; ADULT; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; JOINT; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; LEG; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; WALKING;

ADULT; AGED; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; JOINTS; LEG; MALE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; WALKING;

EID: 84937516074     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.05.021     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Astephen J.L., Deluzio K.J., Caldwell G.E., Dunbar M.J. Biomechanical changes at the hip, knee, and ankle joints during gait are associated with knee osteoarthritis severity. J. Orthop. Res. 2008, 26:332-341.
2. Brinkmann J.R., Perry J. Rate and range of knee motion during ambulation in healthy and arthritic subjects. Phys. Ther. 1985, 65:1055-1060.
3. Chen G., Patten C., Kothari D.H., Zajac F.E. Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait Posture 2005, 22:51-56.
4. Clark R.A., Bower K.J., Mentiplay B.F., Paterson K., Pua Y.H. Concurrent validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of spatiotemporal gait variables. J. Biomech. 2013, 46:2722-2725.
5. Clark R.A., Vernon S., Mentiplay B.F., Miller K.J., McGinely J.L., Pua Y.H., Paterson K., Bower K.J. Instrumenting gait assessment using the Kinect in people living with stroke: Reliability and association with balance tests. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2015, 12:1-9.
6. Collins T.D., Ghoussayni S.N., Ewins D.J., Kent J.A. A six degrees-of-freedom marker set for gait analysis: repeatability and comparison with a modified Helen Hayes set. Gait Posture 2009, 30:173-180.
7. Fleiss J.L. The Design and Analysis of Clincal Experiments 1986, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
8. Galna B., Barry G., Jackson D., Mhiripiri D., Olivier P., Rochester L. Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture 2014, 39:1062-1068.
9. Lewek M.D., Bradley C.E., Wutzke C.J., Zinder S.M. The relationship between spatiotemporal gait asymmetry and balance in individuals with chronic stroke. J. Appl. Biomech. 2014, 30:31-36.
10. Ludbrook J. Confidence in Altman-Bland plots: a critical review of the method of differences. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2010, 37:143-149.
11. McGinley J.L., Baker R., Wolfe R., Morris M.E. The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: A systematic review. Gait Posture 2009, 29:360-369.
12. Patterson K.K., Parafianowicz I., Danells C.J., Closson V., Verrier M.C., Staines W.R., Black S.E., McIlroy W.E. Gait asymmetry in community-ambulating stroke survivors. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2008, 89:304-310.
13. Pfister A., West A.M., Bronner S., Noah J.A. Comparative abilities of Microsoft Kinect and Vicon 3D motion capture for gait analysis. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2014, 38:274-280.
14. Purser J.L., Weinberger M., Cohen H.J., Pieper C.F., Morey M.C., Li T., Williams G.R., Lapuerta P. Walking speed predicts health status and hospital costs for frail elderly male veterans. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2005, 42:535-545.
15. Shotton, J., Fitzgibbon, A., Cook, M., Sharp, T., Finocchio, M., Moore, R., Kipman, A., Blake, A., 2011. Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
16. Stone E., Skubic M. Evaluation of an inexpensive depth camera for in-home gait assessment. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 2011, 3:349-361.
17. Studenski S., Perera S., Patel K., Rosano C., Faulkner K., Inzitari M., Brach J., Chandler J., Cawthon P., Connor E.B., Nevitt M., Visser M., Kritchevsky S., Badinelli S., Harris T., Newman A.B., Cauley J., Ferrucci L., Guralnik J. Gait speed and survival in older adults. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2011, 305:50-58.
18. Vernon S., Paterson K., Bower K., McGinley J., Miller K., Pua Y.H., Clark R.A. Quantifying individual components of the timed up and go using the kinect in people living with stroke. Neurorehabilit. Neural Repair 2015, 29:48-53.
19. Wren T.A.L., Gorton G.E., Õunpuu S., Tucker C.A. Efficacy of clinical gait analysis: a systematic review. Gait Posture 2011, 34:149-153.
20. Wu G., Cavanagh P.R. ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. J. Biomech. 1995, 28:1257-1261.