Quantifying individual components of the timed up and go using the kinect in people living with stroke

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 48-53

  Vernon, Stephanie ^a   Paterson, Kade ^b   Bower, Kelly ^b   McGinley, Jennifer ^b   Miller, Kimberly ^b   Pua, Yong Hao ^c   Clark, Ross A ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Balance; Gait; Gaming; Kinematic; Stroke

Indexed keywords

10 METER WALK TEST; AGED; ANKLE FOOT ORTHOSIS; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CANE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CRUTCH; EXPERIMENTAL LOCOMOTOR ACTIVITY TEST; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL REACH TEST; GAIT; HUMAN; KINECT; MALE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PREDICTION; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; STEP TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TIMED UP AND GO; VELOCITY; WALKER; WALKING AID; DISABILITY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOFTWARE; STROKE; THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STROKE; THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84918580559     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968314529475     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bernhardt J, Ellis P, Denisenko S, Hill K. Changes in balance and locomotion measures during rehabilitation following stroke. Physiother Res Int. 1998;3:109-122.
2. Faria C, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Silva EB, Nadeau S. Expanded Timed Up and Go test with subjects with stroke: reliability and comparisons with matched healthy controls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1034-1038.
3. Greene BR, O'Donovan A, Romero-Ortuno R, Cogan L, Scanaill CN, Kenny RA. Quantitative falls risk assessment using the timed up and go test. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57:2918-2926.
4. Salarian A, Horak FB, Zampieri C, Carlson-Kuhta P, Nutt JG, Aminian K. iTUG, a sensitive and reliable measure of mobility. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010;18:303-310.
5. Weiss A, Herman T, Plotnik M, Brozgol M, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. An instrumented timed up and go: the added value of an accelerometer for identifying fall risk in idiopathic fallers. Physiol Meas. 2011;32:2003-2018.
6. Hollands KL, Hollands MA, Zietz D, Miles Wing A, Wright C, Van Vliet P. Kinematics of turning 180° during the Timed Up and Go in stroke survivors with and without falls history. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:358-367.
7. Dite W, Temple VA. Development of a clinical measure of turning for older adults. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:857-866.
8. Clark RA, Pua Y-H, Fortin K, et al. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. Gait Posture. 2012;36:372-377.
9. Stone EE, Skubic M. Evaluation of an inexpensive depth camera for in-home gait assessment. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ. 2011;3:349-361.
10. Clark RA, Bower KJ, Mentiplay BF, Paterson K, Pua YH. Concurrent validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of spatiotemporal gait variables. J Biomech. 2013;46:2722-2725.
11. Thrane G, Joakimsen RM, Thornquist E. The association between timed up and go test and history of falls: the Tromso study. BMC Geriatr. 2007;7:1.
12. Mercer VS, Freburger JK, Chang SH, Purser JL. Step test scores are related to measures of activity and participation in the first 6 months after stroke. Phys Ther. 2009;89:1061-1071.
13. Duncan P, Weiner D, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol. 1990;45:192-197.
14. Menna F, Remondino F, Battisti R, Nocerino E. Geometric investigation of a gaming active device. Proceedings of Videometrics, Range Imaging and Applications XI, SPIE Optical Metrology, Vol 80850G-1-15. Bellingham, WA: ETATS-UNIS, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers; 2011.
15. Shotton J, Fitzgibbon A, Cook M, et al. Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recogn. 2011;2:1297-1304.
16. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:85-91.
17. Moons KG, Donders AR, Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE. Penalized maximum likelihood estimation to directly adjust diagnostic and prognostic prediction models for overoptimism: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1262-1270.
18. Harrell FE Jr. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York, NY: Springer; 2001.
19. Flansbjer U-B, Holmbäck AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:75-82.
20. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:743-749.
21. Hong SJ, Goh EY, Chua SY, Ng SS. Reliability and validity of step test scores in subjects with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1065-1071.
22. Outermans JC, van Peppen RP, Wittink H, Takken T, Kwakkel G. Effects of a high-intensity task-oriented training on gait performance early after stroke: a pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:979-987.
23. Millington PJ, Myklebust BM, Shambes GM. Biomechanical analysis of the sit-to-stand motion in elderly persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:609-617.