User interfaces for on-line diagram recognition

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2390, Issue , 2002, Pages 92-103

  Blostein, Dorothea ^a   Lank, Ed ^a   Rose, Arlis ^a   Zanibbi, Richard ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Diagram recognition; Graphics recognition; User interfaces

Indexed keywords

PATTERN RECOGNITION; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

DIAGRAM RECOGNITION; EVALUATING USER INTERFACES; GRAPHICS RECOGNITION; LINE DIAGRAMS; MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; UML(UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE);

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84937420392     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45868-9_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. J. Arvo, K. Novins,.Smart Text: A Synthesis of Recognition and Morphing,. Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Smart Graphics, Stanford, Cal., March 2000, 140.147.
2. S. Bagley, G. Kopec,.Editing Images of Text,. Communications of the ACM, 37(4), Dec. 1994, 63.72.
3. D. Blostein, L. Haken,.The Lime Music Editor: A Diagram Editor Involving Complex Translations,. Software. Practice and Experience, 24(3), March 1994, 289.306.
4. D. Blostein, L. Haken,.Using Diagram Generation Software to Improve Diagram Recognition: A Case Study of Music Notation,. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(11), Nov. 1999, 1121.1136.
5. K. Brooks,.Lilac: A Two-View Document Editor,. IEEE Computer, June 1991, 7.19.
6. M. Brown,. Zeus: A System for Algorithm Animation and Multi-View Editing,. Proc. IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages, Kobe, Japan, Oct. 1991, 4.9.
7. J. Carroll, editor, Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development, John Wiley,1995.
8. HCI journals: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction; International Journal of Man-Machine Studies; Human-Computer Interaction; Behavior and Information Technology; Human Factors.
9. W. Cushman, P. Ojha, C. Daniels,.Usable OCR: What are the Minimum Performance Requirements?,. Proc. ACM SIGCHI 1990 Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, Washington, April 1990, 145.151.
10. C. Damm, K. Hansen, M. Thomsen,.Tool Support for Cooperative Object-Oriented Design: Gesture Based Modeling on an Electronic Whiteboard,. Proc. CHI 2000, The Hague, Netherlands, April 2000, 518.525 See also www.daimi.au.dk/~knight/.
11. D. Diaper,.Task Observation for Human-Computer Interaction,. in D. Diaper, editor, Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction, Ellis Horwood, 1989, 210.237.
12. T. C. N. Graham, L. Watts, G. Calvary, J. Coutaz, E. Dubois, L. Nigay,.A Dimension Space for the Design of Interactive Systems Within their Physical Environments,. Proc. Designing Interactive Systems (DIS 2000), 2000, 406.416.
13. M. Gross, E. Do,.Ambiguous Intentions: a Paper-like Interface for Creative Design,. Proc. Ninth Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’96), Seattle, Washington, Nov. 1996, 183.192.
14. K. Höök,.Designing and Evaluating Intelligent User Interfaces,. Proc. 1998 ACM Int.l Conf. Intelligent User Interfaces, San Francisco, California, 1998, 5.6.
15. R. Hsu, W. Mitchell,.After 400 Years, Print is Still Superior,. Communications of the ACM, 40(10), Oct. 1997, 27.28.
16. L. Julia, C. Faure,.Pattern Recognition and Beautification for a Pen Based Interface,. Proc. Third Int.l Conf. Document Analysis and Recognition, Montreal, Canada, August 1995, 58.63.
17. E. Lank, J. Thorley, S. Chen, D. Blostein,.On-line Recognition of UML Diagrams,. Proc. Sixth Int.l Conf. Document Analysis and Recognition, Seattle, Washington, Sept. 2001, 356.360.
18. A. Long, J. Landay, L. Rowe, J. Michiels,.Visual Similarity of Pen Gestures,. Proc. CHI 2000 Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, April 2000, 360.367.
19. J. Mankoff, S. Hudson, G. Abowd,.Providing Integrated Toolkit-Level Support for Ambiguity in Recognition-Based Interfaces,. Proc. CHI 2000 Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, Netherlands, April 2000, 368.375.
20. J. McGrenere, W. Ho,.Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concept,. Proc. Graphics Interface 2000, 179.186.
21. B. Myers,.User Interface Software Tools,. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, 2(1), 1995, 64.103.
22. M. Nakagawa, K. Machii, N. Kato, T. Souya,.Lazy Recognition as a Principle of Pen Interfaces,. Proc. INTERACT’93 and CHI’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Amsterdam, 1993, 89.90.
23. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1993.
24. J. Nielsen, J. Levy,.Measuring Usability: Preference vs. Performance,. Communications of the ACM, 37(4), April 1994, 66.75.
25. I. Phillips, A. Chhabra,.Empirical Performance Evaluation of Graphics Recognition Systems,. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21 (9), Sept. 1999, 849.870.
26. S. Smithies, K. Novins, J. Arvo,.A Handwriting-Based Equation Editor,. Proc. Graphics Interface’99, Kingston, Ontario, June 1999, 84.91.
27. J. Tang, S. Minneman,.VideoWhiteboard: Video Shadows to Support Remote Collaboration,. Proc. Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1991, 315.322.
28. B. Vander Zanden, S. Venckus,.An Empirical Study of Constraint Usage in Graphical Applications,. Proc UIST’96. Ninth Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Seattle, Washington, Nov. 1996, 137.146.
29. R. Zanibbi, D. Blostein, J. Cordy,.Baseline Structure Analysis of Handwritten Mathematics Notation,. Proc. Sixth Int.l Conf. Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR 2001), Seattle, Washington, Sept. 2001, 768.773.
30. R. Zanibbi, K. Novins, J. Arvo, K. Zanibbi,.Aiding Manipulation of Handwritten Mathematical Expressions through Style-Preserving Morphs,. Proc. Graphics Interface 2001, Ottawa, Ontario, June 2001, 127.134.