Accessory stimulus modulates executive function during stepping task

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 419-426

  Watanabe, Tatsunori ^a   Koyama, Soichiro ^b   Tanabe, Shigeo ^c   Nojima, Ippei ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Kawamura Hospital   (Japan)

^c FUJITA HEALTH UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SOUND; VISUAL STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ASSOCIATION; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; DECISION MAKING; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ANTICIPATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CUES; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; POSTURE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937417135     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00222.2015     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barry E, Galvin R, Keogh C, Horgan F, Fahey T. Is the Timed Up and Go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 14: 14, 2014
2. Böckler A, Alpay G, Stürmer B. Accessory stimuli affect the emergence of conflict, not conflict control. Exp Psychol 58: 102-109, 2011
3. Burle B, Possamaï CA, Vidal F, Bonnet M, Hasbroucq T. Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychol Res 66: 324-336, 2002
4. Burle B, Roger C, Allain S, Vidal F, Hasbroucq T. Error negativity does not reflect conflict: a reappraisal of conflict monitoring and anterior cingulated cortex activity. J Cogn Neurosci 20: 1637-1655, 2008.
5. Carlsen AN, Chua R, Inglis JT, Sanderson DJ, Franks IM. Can prepared responses be stored subcortically? Exp Brain Res 159: 301-309, 2004a
6. Carlsen AN, Chua R, Inglis JT, Sanderson DJ, Franks IM. Prepared movements are elicited early by startle. J Mot Behav 36: 253-264, 2004b
7. Cohen RG, Nutt JG, Horak FB. Errors in postural preparation lead to increased choice reaction times for step initiation in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 66: 705-713, 2011.
8. Eriksen CW, Coles MG, Morris LR, Ohara WP. An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bull Psychon Soc 23: 165-168, 1985.
9. Fischer R, Plessow F, Kiesel A. Auditory warning signals affect mechanisms of response selection: evidence from a Simon task. Exp Psychol 57: 89-97, 2010.
10. Forstmann BU, Tittgemeyer M, Wagenmakers EJ, Derrfuss J, Imperati D, Brown S. The speed-accuracy tradeoff in the elderly brain: a structural model-based approach. J Neurosci 31: 17242-17249, 2011
11. Hackley SA, Valle-Inclán F. Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task. Nature 391: 786-788, 1998
12. Hackley SA, Valle-Inclán F. Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: does arousal speed decision making? J Cogn Neurosci 11: 321-329, 1999.
13. Hasbroucq T, Possamai CA, Bonnet M, Vidal F. Effect of the irrelevant location of the response signal on choice reaction time: an electromyographic study in humans. Psychophysiology 36: 522-526, 1999
14. Jepma M, Wagenmakers EJ, Band GP, Nieuwenhuis S. The effects of accessory stimuli on information processing: evidence from electrophysiology and a diffusion model analysis. J Cogn Neurosci 21: 847-864, 2009.
15. Kiesel A, Miller J. Impact of contingency manipulations on accessory stim-ulus effects. Percept Psychophys 69: 1117-1125, 2007.
16. Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. Choice stepping reaction time: a composite measure of falls risk in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56: M627-M632, 2001.
17. Low KA, Larson SL, Burke J, Hackley SA. Alerting effects on choice reaction time and the photic eyeblink reflex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 98: 385-393, 1996.
18. MacKinnon CD, Bissig D, Chiusano J, Miller E, Rudnick L, Jager C, Zhang Y, Mille ML, Rogers MW. Preparation of anticipatory postural adjustments prior to stepping. J Neurophysiol 97: 4368-4379, 2007
19. Masaki H, Murphy TI, Desjardins JA, Segalowitz SJ. The error-related negativity associated with different strength of stimulus-response interference. Clin Neurophysiol 123: 689-699, 2012.
20. Melzer I, Oddsson LI. The effect of a cognitive task on voluntary step execution in healthy elderly and young individuals. J Am Geriatr Soc 52: 1255-1262, 2004.
21. Miller J, Franz V, Ulrich R. Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks. Percept Psycho-phys 61: 107-119, 1999.
22. Pijnappels M, Delbaere K, Sturnieks DL, Lord SR. The association be-tween choice stepping reaction time and falls in older adults—a path analysis model. Age Ageing 39: 99-104, 2010.
23. Queralt A, Valls-Sole J, Castellote JM. Speeding up gait initiation and gait-pattern with a startling stimulus. Gait Posture 31: 185-190, 2010.
24. Queralt A, Weerdesteyn V, van Duijnhoven HJ, Castellote JM, Valls-Solé J, Duysens J. The effects of an auditory startle on obstacle avoidance during walking. J Physiol 586: 4453-4463, 2008.
25. Reynolds RF, Day BL. Fast visuomotor processing made faster by sound. J Physiol 583: 1107-1115, 2007
26. Schmidt RA, Gielen SC, van den Heuvel PJ. The locus of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. Acta Psychol (Amst) 57: 145-164, 1984.
27. Schoene D, Smith ST, Davies TA, Delbaere K, Lord SR. A Stroop Stepping Test (SST) using low-cost computer game technology discriminates between older fallers and non-fallers. Age Ageing 43: 285-289, 2014.
28. Schoene D, Wu SM, Mikolaizak AS, Menant JC, Smith ST, Delbaere K, Lord SR. Discriminative ability and predictive validity of the timed up and go test in identifying older people who fall: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 61: 202-208, 2013.
29. Simon JR. Reactions toward source of stimulation. J Exp Psychol 81: 174-176, 1969.
30. Soutschek A, Müller HJ, Schubert T. Conflict-specific effects of accessory stimuli on cognitive control in the Stroop task and the Simon task. Exp Psychol 60: 140-147, 2013.
31. Sparto PJ, Fuhrman SI, Redfern MS, Jennings JR, Perera S, Nebes RD, Furman JM. Postural adjustment errors reveal deficits in inhibition during lateral step initiation in older adults. J Neurophysiol 109: 415-428, 2013
32. Sparto PJ, Jennings JR, Furman JM, Redfern MS. Lateral step initiation behavior in older adults. Gait Posture 39: 799-803, 2014.
33. St George RJ, Fitzpatrick RC, Rogers MW, Lord SR. Choice stepping response and transfer times: effects of age, fall risk, and secondary tasks. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62: 537-542, 2007.
34. Stahl J, Rammsayer TH. Accessory stimulation in the time course of visuomotor information processing: stimulus intensity effects on reaction time and response force. Acta Psychol (Amst) 120: 1-18, 2005.
35. Steinborn MB, Rolke B, Bratzke D, Ulrich R. Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect. Acta Psychol (Amst) 132: 40-47, 2009.
36. Steinborn MB, Rolke B, Bratzke D, Ulrich R. The effect of a cross-trial shift of auditory warning signals on the sequential foreperiod effect. Acta Psychol (Amst) 134: 94-104, 2010.
37. Uemura K, Oya T, Uchiyama Y. Effects of speed and accuracy strategy on choice step execution in response to the flanker interference task. Hum Mov Sci 32: 1393-1403, 2013a.
38. Uemura K, Oya T, Uchiyama Y. Effects of visual interference on initial motor program errors and execution times in the choice step reaction. Gait Posture 38: 68-72, 2013b.
39. Valls-Solé J, Rothwell JC, Goulart F, Cossu G, Muñoz E. Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans. J Physiol 516: 931-938, 1999
40. Valls-Solé J, Solé A, Valldeoriola F, Muñoz E, Gonzalez LE, Tolosa ES. Reaction time and acoustic startle in normal human subjects. Neurosci Lett 195: 97-100, 1995.
41. Vidal F, Hasbroucq T, Grapperon J, Bonnet M. Is the “error negativity” specific to errors? Biol Psychol 51: 109-128, 2000.