Change blind information display for ubiquitous computing environments

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2498, Issue , 2002, Pages 91-106

  Intille, Stephen S ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL DEVICES; DISPLAY DEVICES;

CHANGE BLINDNESS; COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS; HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEM; INFORMATION DISPLAY; MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT;

UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

EID: 84937407577     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45809-3_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. G.D. Abowd and E.D. Mynatt. Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1):29-58, 2000.
2. V. Aginsky and M.J. Tarr. How are different properties of a scene encoded in visual memory? Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):147-162, 2000.
3. G. Agostinelli, S.J. Sherman, R.H. Fazio, and E.S. Hearst. Detecting and identifying change: Additions versus deletions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(4):445-454, 1986.
4. S.J. Blackmore, G. Brelstaff, K. Nelson, and T. Troscianko. Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes. Perception, 24:1075-1081, 1995.
5. J.S. Brown and P. Duguid. Keeping it simple. In Terry Winograd, editor, Bringing Design to Software. Addison-Wesley Pub Co, 1995.
6. B. Buxton. Integrating the periphery and context: A new taxonomy of telematics. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface, pages 239-246, 1995.
7. J. Grimes. On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins, editor, Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, volume 2: Perception. Oxford University Press, 1996.
8. J.M. Heiner, S.E. Hudson, and K. Tanaka. The Information Percolator: Ambient information in a decorative object. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 141-148. ACM Press, November 1999.
9. J.M. Henderson. Transsaccadic memory and integration during real-world object perception. Psychonomic Science, 8:51-55, 1997.
10. E. Horvitz, J. Breese, D. Heckerman, D. Hovel, and K. Rommelse. The Lumiere Project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 256-265, San Francisco, July 1998. Morgan Kaufmann.
11. J. Hotchberg. Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In K.R. Boff, L.K. Kaufman, and J.P. Thomas, editors, Handbook of perception and human performance, pages 22.1-22.64, London, 1986. John Wiley & Sons.
12. G. Humphreys and P. Hanrahan. A distributed graphics system for large tiled displays. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization ’99, October 1999.
13. N. Jeremijenko. The dangling string. Artistic Exhibit.
14. R. Klein, A. Kingstone, and A. Pontefract. Orienting of visual attention. In K. Rayner, editor, Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading, pages 46-65, New York, 1992. Springer.
15. D.T. Levin and D.J. Simons. Perceiving stability in a changing world: Combining shots and integrating views in motion pictures and the real world. Media Psychology, 2:357-380, 2000.
16. B. MacIntyre, E.D. Mynatt, S. Voida, K.M. Hansen, J. Tullio, and G.M. Corso. Support for multitasking and background awareness using interactive peripheral displays. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 41-50, New York, NY, 2001. ACM Press.
17. P.P. Maglio and C.S. Campbell. Tradeoffs in displaying peripheral information. In Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 241-248, New York, NY, 2000. ACM Press.
18. C.C. Mann. Electronic paper turns the page. Technology Review, March 2001.
19. G. McConkie and D. Zola. Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? Perception and Psychophysics, 25:221-224, 1979.
20. S. Mondy and V. Coltheart. Detection and identification of change in naturalistic scenes. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):281-296, 2000.
21. D.A. Norman. The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, New York, NY, 1989.
22. J.K. O’Regan, R.A. Rensink, and J.J. Clark. Change-blindness as a result of “mudsplashes”. Nature, 398:34, 1999.
23. C. Pinhanez. The Everywhere Displays Projector: A device to create ubiquitous graphical interfaces. In G.D. Abowd, B. Brumitt, and S.A.N. Shafer, editors, Proceedings of the Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, LNCS 2201, pages 315-331, Berlin Heidelberg, September 2001. Springer-Verlag.
24. R.A. Rensink. The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):17-42, 2000.
25. R.A. Rensink, J.K. O’Regan, and J.J. Clark. To see or not to see: the need for attention to preceived changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8:368-373, 1997.
26. J.W. Rohrbaugh. The orienting reflex in humans. In Varieties of Attention, pages 323-373. Orlando Academic Press, 1984.
27. D. Salber, A.K. Dey, and G.D. Abowd. The Context Toolkit: Aiding the development of context-enabled applications. In Proceeding of the CHI 99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: the CHI is the Limit, pages 434-441, New York, NY, 1999. ACM Press.
28. K.L. Shapiro. Change blindness: theory or paradigm? Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):83-92, 2000.
29. D.J. Simons. Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):1-15, 2000.
30. D.J. Simons and D.T. Levin. Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1(7):261-267, 1997.
31. D.J. Simons, R.L. Reimer, and S.L. Franconeri. The role of abstract representations and motion signals in change detection. In Proceedings of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, April 2000.
32. W.S. Sun, R.S. Baker, J.S. Chuke, B.R. Rouholiman, S.A. Hansan, W. Gaza, M.W. Stava, and J.D. Porter. Age related changes in human blinks. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38(1):92-99, 1997.
33. B. Tversky and T. Sherman. Picture memory improves with longer on time and off time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104:114-118, 1975.
34. G. Wallis and H. Bülthoff. What’s scene and not seen: Influences of movement and task upon what we see. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3):175-190, 2000.
35. M. Weiser and J. Brown. Designing calm technology. PowerGrid Journal, 1(1), 1996.
36. Craig Wisneski, Hiroshi Ishii, Andrew Dahley, Matt Gorbet, Scott Brave, Brygg Ullmer, and Paul Yarin. Ambient displays: Turning architectural space into an interface between people and digital information. In N.A. Streitz, S. Konomi, and H-J. Burkhardt, editors, Proceedings of Cooperative Buildings, Integrating Infor- mation, Organization and Architecture, First International Workshop, CoBuild’98, LNCS 1370, pages 22-32. Springer, 1998.