A double-blinded randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of minimally invasive procedures using patient-reported outcomes

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 221, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 111-121

  Bingener, Juliane ^a   Skaran, Pam ^a   McConico, Andrea ^a   Novotny, Paul ^a   Wettstein, Peter ^a   Sletten, David M ^a   Park, Myung ^a   Low, Philip ^a   Sloan, Jeff ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERLEUKIN 10; INTERLEUKIN 6; INTERLEUKIN 8; KETOROLAC; MORPHINE; NARCOTIC AGENT; PARACETAMOL; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATELECTASIS; BILIARY COLIC; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHRONIC CHOLECYSTITIS; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DYSPNEA; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ERYTHEMA; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FOUR PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; GALLBLADDER DISEASE; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OCCLUSIVE DRESSING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; SELF EVALUATION; SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UMBILICAL HERNIA; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WOUND DEHISCENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GALLBLADDER DISEASES; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; SELF REPORT;

ADULT; AGED; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FATIGUE; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER DISEASES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF REPORT;

EID: 84937391678     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: 18791190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.022     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. A. Detsky What patients really want from health care JAMA 306 2011 2500 2501
2. National Institute of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 2004 NIH Bethesda, MD
3. J. Fries, and M. Rose Krishnan. The PROMIS of better outcome assessment: responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and internet administration J Rheumatol 38 2011 1759 1764
4. J. Bingener, J.A. Sloan, D.K. Seisler, and et al. PROMIS for laparoscopy J Gastrointest Surg 2015
5. Antiel RM, Dupont S, Samaha M, et al. Patient Reported Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Abstract. Oral presentation at Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Salt Lake City, UT, 2014.
6. J. Bingener, L.S. Ghahfarokhi, P. Skaran, and J. Sloan Responsiveness of quality of life instruments for the comparison of minimally invasive cholecystectomy procedures Surg Endosc 27 2013 2446 2453
7. F. Efficace, A. Bottomley, D. Osoba, and et al. Beyond the development of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures: a checklist for evaluating HRQOL outcomes in cancer clinical trials - does HRQOL evaluation in prostate cancer research inform clinical decision making? J Clin Oncol 21 2003 3502 3511
8. K.L. Leung, P.B. Lai, R.L. Ho, and et al. Systemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial Ann Surg 231 2000 506 511
9. L. Sarli, D. Iusco, S. Gobbi, and et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments Br J Surg 90 2003 1345 1348
10. C.G. McGregor, M.H. Sodergren, A. Aslanyan, and et al. Evaluating systemic stress response in single port vs. multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Gastrointest Surg 15 2011 614 622
11. B.U. Jan, S.M. Coyle, L.O. Oikawa, and et al. Influence of acute epinephrine infusion on endotoxin-induced parameters of heart rate variability: a randomized controlled trial Ann Surg 249 2009 750 756
12. A. Bickel, M. Yahalom, N. Roguin, and et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability during positive pressure pneumoperitoneum: the significance of increased cardiac sympathetic expression Surg Endosc 16 2002 1341 1344
13. A. Bickel, E. Kukuev, O. Popov, and et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability during helium pneumoperitoneum: the mechanism of increased cardiac sympathetic activity and its clinical significance Surg Endosc 19 2005 71 76
14. M. Kunkala, J. Bingener, M. Park, and et al. Single-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: difference in outcomes Minerva Chir 68 2013 155 162
15. S. Strasberg Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9 2002 543 547
16. D. Revicki, R. Hays, D. Cella, and J. Sloan Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes J Clin Epidemiol 61 2008 102 109
17. H. Kehlet, A. Gray, F. Bonnet, and et al. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 19 2005 1396 1415
18. A. Agarwal, S. Gautam, D. Gupta, and et al. Evaluation of a single preoperative dose of pregabalin for attenuation of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy Br J Anaesth 101 2008 700 704
19. M.S. Phillips, J.M. Marks, K. Roberts, and et al. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 26 2012 1296 1303
20. L.N. Jorgensen, J. Rosenberg, H. Al-Tayar, and et al. Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy Br J Surg 101 2014 347 355
21. K. Emre Telciler, E. Ilhan, S. Yakan, and et al. Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the classical four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective clinical trial Minerva Chir 69 2014 1 7
22. M.H. Sodergren, A. Aslanyan, C.G. McGregor, and et al. Pain, well-being, body image and cosmesis: a comparison of single-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23 2014 223 229
23. Z. Khorgami, S. Shoar, T. Anbara, and et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing 4-port, 3-port, and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Invest Surg 27 2014 147 154
24. Mohamed AO, Bingener J, Lowndes B, et al. Modified NASA Workload Tool Identifies Physical and Cognitive Surgeon Workload for Laparoscopic Procedures, presentation at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress 2014, San Francisco, CA, 2014.