A randomized clinical trial comparing 4-Port, 3-Port, and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Journal of Investigative Surgery

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 147-154

  Khorgami, Zhamak ^a   Shoar, Saeed ^a   Anbara, Taha ^a   Soroush, Ahmadreza ^a   Nasiri, Shirzad ^a   Movafegh, Ali ^a   Aminian, Ali ^b  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Outcomes; Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Single incision laparoscopic surgery

Indexed keywords

MORPHINE;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; BODY MASS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUGHING; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOUR PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; IRAN; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; IRAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84899854829     PISSN: 08941939     EISSN: 15210553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/08941939.2013.856497     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, et al. Laparoscopicversus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomaticcholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2006;4:CD006231.
2. de la Fuente SG, Demaria EJ, Reynolds JD, et al. New developmentsin surgery: natural orifice transluminal endoscopicsurgery (NOTES). Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):295-297.
3. Slim K, Pezet D, Stencl J, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy:an original three-trocar technique. World J Surg.1995;19(3):394-397.
4. Kaiser AM, Corman ML. History of laparoscopy. Surg OncolClin N Am. 2001;10(3):483-492.
5. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, et al. One-wound laparoscopiccholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84(5):695.
6. Song S, Itawi EA, Saber AA. Natural orifice translumenalendoscopic surgery (NOTES). J Invest Surg.2009;22(3):214-217.
7. Joseph M, Phillips MR, Farrell TM, et al. Single incision laparoscopiccholecystectomy is associated with a higher bileduct injury rate: a review and a word of caution. Ann Surg.2012;256(1):1-6.
8. Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, et al. Single-incision laparoscopiccholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopiccholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic reviewof randomized controlled trials. World J Surg.2012;36(11):2644-2653.
9. Garg P, Thakur JD, Garg M, et al. Single-incision laparoscopiccholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopiccholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlledtrials. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(8):1618-1628.
10. Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK, et al. Single-incisionlaparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. ArchSurg. 2012;147(7):657-666.
11. Song T, Liao B, Liu J, et al. Single-incision versus conventionallaparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic reviewof available data. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech.2012;22(4):e190-e196.
12. Luo C, Yang Q, Liu B, et al. Difficulties and countermeasuresof transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(5):e35-e38.
13. Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, et al. Intermediateresults of a prospective randomized controlled trial oftraditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versussingle-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc.2012;26(5):1296-1303.
14. Karim MA, Ahmed J, Mansour M, et al. Single incisionvs. conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a comparison of two approaches. Int J Surg.2012;10(7):368-372.
15. Abdelaziz Hassan AM, Elsebae MM, Nasr MM, et al. Singleinstitution experience of single incision trans-umbilicallaparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional laparoscopicinstruments. Int J Surg. 2012;10(9):514-7.
16. Choi SH, Hwang HK, Kang CM, et al. Single-fulcrum laparoscopiccholecystectomy: a single-incision and multiporttechnique. ANZ J Surg. 2012;82(7-8):529-534.
17. El-Geidie AA. single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SILC) using harmonic scalpel. J Surg Res, 2012;176(1):50-54.
18. Cui H, Kelly JJ, Litwin DE. Single-incision laparoscopiccholecystectomy using a modified dome-down approachwith conventional laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc.2012;26(4):1153-1159.
19. Sumiyoshi K, Sato N, Akagawa S, et al. Single-incision laparoscopiccholecystectomy with needle graspers. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59(114):325-328.
20. Beck C, Eakin J, Dettorre R, et al. Analysis of perioperativefactors and cost comparison of single-incision and traditionalmulti-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SurgEndosc. 2013;27(1):104-8.
21. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, et al.Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventionalmultiport cholecystectomy: systematic review andmeta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(5):1205-1213.
22. Qiu Z, Sun J, Pu Y, et al. Learning curve of transumbilicalsingle incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS): apreliminary study of 80 selected patients with benign gallbladderdiseases. World J Surg. 2011;35(9): 2092-2101.
23. Markar S, Kinross J. Authors' reply to: single-incisionlaparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiportcholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10): 3000-3001.
24. Yeo D, Mackay S, Martin D. Single-incision laparoscopiccholecystectomywith routine intraoperative cholangiographyand common bile duct exploration via the umbilicalport. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):1122-1127.
25. Joseph M, Phillips M, Rupp CC. Single-incision laparoscopiccholecystectomy: a combined analysis of residentand attending learning curves at a single institution. AmSurg. 2012;78(1):119-124.
26. Sasaki K, Watanabe G, Matsuda M, et al. Single-incisionlaparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison analysis of feasibilityand safety. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech.2012;22(2):108-113.
27. Arroyo JP, Martin-Del-Campo LA, Torres-VillalobosG. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is ita plausible alternative to the traditional four-port laparoscopicapproach Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:347607.
28. Chakravartty S, Murgatroyd B, Ashton D, et al. Singleand Multiple Incision Laparoscopic Adjustable GastricBanding: a matched comparison. Obes Surg. 2012;22(11):1695-700.
29. Paranjape C, Ojo OJ, Carne D, et al. Single-incision laparoscopictotal colectomy. JSLS. 2012;16(1):27-32.
30. Makino T, Milsom JW, Lee SW. Single-incision laparoscopicsurgeries for colorectal diseases: early experiencesof a novel surgical method. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:783074.
31. Yang G, Lai E, Chan O, Tang C, et al. Single-incision transabdominalpreperitoneal and totally extraperitoneal repairfor inguinal hernia: early experience froma single center inAsia. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011;4(4):166-70.
32. Iida T, Kawa G, Takizawa N, et al. Laparoendoscopicsingle-site surgery for urachal remnants. Asian J EndoscSurg. 2012;5(2):100-102.