L1 interference in second language acquisition: The case of question formation in Canadian French

IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 61-68

  Picard, Marc ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937387996     PISSN: 0019042X     EISSN: 16134141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/iral.2002.004     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Auger, Julie (1996). Subject-clitic inversion in Romance: A morphological analysis. In Aspects of Romance Linguistics, Claudia Parodi, Carlos Quicoli, Mario Saltarelli and María Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), 23–40. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
2. Barbarie, Yves (1982). Analyse sociolinguistique de la syntaxe de l'interrogation en francais québécois. Revue québécoise de linguistique 12 (1): 145–167.
3. Bourciez, Edouard (1967). Eléments de linguistique romane. Paris: Editions Klincksieck.
4. Deshaies, Denise (1981). Le francais parlé dans la ville de Québec: une étude sociolinguistique. Québec: Centre international de recherche sur le bilinguisme.
5. Dewaele, Jean-Marc (1999). Word order variation in French interrogative structures. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics 123: 161–180.
6. Eckman, Fred R. (1981). On predicting phonological difficulty in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Education 4: 18–30.
7. Fox, Cynthia A. (1989). Syntactic variation and interrogative structures in Québécois. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
8. Fox, Cynthia A. (1991). A discriminant analysis of yes-no questions in Quebec French. Wo rd 42: 277–293.
9. Grevisse, Maurice (1986). Le bon usage. 12th ed., revised by André Goosse. Paris: Duculot.
10. Hyltenstam, Kenneth (1987). Markedness, language universals, language typology and second language acquisition. In First and Second Language Acquisition Processes, Carol W. Pfaff (ed.), 55–78. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
11. Lightbown, Patsy M. and Nina Spada (1997). L1 constraints in interlanguage judgments of grammaticality. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Second Language Research Forum, Michigan State University, East Lansing. abstract online at .
12. Lyster, Roy (1996). Question forms, conditionals, and second-person pronouns used by adolescent native speakers across two levels of formality in written and spoken French. Modern Language Journal 80: 165–182.
13. Morin, Yves-Charles (1985). On the two French subjectless verbs voici and voilà. Language 61: 777–820.
14. Mougeon, Francoise (1998). Quel francais parler? Initiation au francais parlé au Canada et en France. Toronto: Éditions du Gref.
15. Picard, Marc (1991). Clitics, affixes, and the evolution of the question marker ‘tu’ in Canadian French. Journal of French Language Studies 1: 179–187.
16. Picard, Marc (1992). Aspects synchroniques et diachroniques du tu interrogatif en québécois. Revue québé-coise de linguistique 21: 65–75.
17. Pope, Mildred K. (1952). From Latin to Modern French. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
18. Richards, Jack C., John Platt and Heidi Platt (1992). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Harlow: Longman.
19. Spada, Nina and Patsy M. Lightbown (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 205–224.
20. White, Lydia, Nina Spada, Patsy M. Lightbown and Leila Ranta (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics 12: 416–432.