From parts to wholes and back again

Cognitive Linguistics

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 403-439

  Verhagen, Arie ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

construction grammar; Dutch way construction; language change; structure of grammar; usage based approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937382527     PISSN: 09365907     EISSN: 16133641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/cogl.2002.024     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Booij, Geert 2002 Constructional idioms, morphology, and the Dutch Lexicon. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14.
2. Bowerman, Melissa 1988 The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In Hawkins J. (ed.), Explaining Language Universals. Oxford: Blackwell, 73-101.
3. Bybee, Joan 1995 Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10, 425-455.
4. Bybee, Joan and Paul Hopper (eds.) 2001 Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins.
5. Croft, William 2000 Explaining Language Change. An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
6. Duinhoven, A. M. 1997 Middelnederlandse Syntax is: Synchroon en Diachroon. Deel II. De Werk-woordgroep [Middle Dutch Syntax: synchronically and diachronically. Part II. The verb phrase]. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.
7. Fauconnier, Gilles 1994 Mental Spaces. Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [First edition: 1985, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.]
8. Geeraerts, Dirk 1995 Specialization and reinterpretation in idioms. In Everaert, Martin, Erik-Jan van der Linden, André Schenk, and Rob Schreuder (eds.), Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 57-73.
9. Goldberg, Adele E. 1995 Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
10. Goldberg, Adele E. 1996 Making one's way through the data. In Shibatani, Masayoshi and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical Constructions. Their Form and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29-53.
11. Huyssteen, Gerhard B. van 2000 Die reduplikasiekonstruksie in Afrikaans: Enkele aspekte van n kognitiewe gebruiksgebaseerde beskrywingsmodel vir Afrikaans [The reduplication construction in Afrikaans: some aspects of a cognitive usage based model for Afrikaans]. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir Christelike Hoer Onderwys, South-Africa.
12. Israel, Michael 1996 The way constructions grow. In Goldberg, Adele (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 217-230.
13. Jackendoff, Ray 1975 Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51, 639-671.
14. Jackendoff, Ray 1997 Twistin the night away. Language 73, 534-559.
15. Kramer, Annelies 2002 De geschiedenis van de Nederlandse weg-constructie [The history of the Dutch way construction]. Unpublished MA thesis, Dept. of Dutch, University of Leiden.
16. Langacker, Ronald W. 1988 A usage-based model. In Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 127-161.
17. Langacker, Ronald W. 2000 A dynamic usage-based model. In Barlow, Michael and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1-63.
18. Levinson, Stephen C. 2000 Presumptive meanings. The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19. Schwenter, Scott A. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott 2000 Invoking scalarity: The development of in fact. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1, 7-25.
20. Tomasello, Michael 2000 First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics 11, 61-82.
21. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs to appear Historical pragmatics. In Horn, Laurence R. and Gregory Ward (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics.
22. Verhagen, Arie 2000a Interpreting usage: Construing the history of Dutch causal verbs. In Barlow, Michael and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 261-286.
23. Verhagen, Arie 2000b Concession implies causality, though in some other space. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause - Condition - Concession -Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 361-380.
24. Verhagen, Arie 2001 Subordination and discourse segmentation revisited, or: Why matrix clauses may be more dependent than complements. In Sanders, Ted, Joost Schilperoord and Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text Representation. Linguistic and Psychological Aspects. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 337-357.
25. Verhagen, Arie and Suzanne Kemmer 1997 Interaction and causation: Causative constructions in modern standard Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics 27, 61-82.
26. Vries, Jan W. de 1975 Lexicale Morfologie van het Werkwoord in Modern Nederlands [Lexical morphology of the verb in modern Dutch]. Leiden: Universitaire Pers.
27. WNT 1882-1998 Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal [Dictionary of the Dutch Language]. Edited by M. de Vries and L.A. te Winkel. The Hague: Nijhoff.