A new institutional balance for European foreign policy?

European Foreign Affairs Review

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 369-400

  Pernice, Ingolf ^a   Thym, Daniel ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937375276     PISSN: 13846299     EISSN: 18758223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.54648/eerr2002002     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union, Annex I to the Presidency Conclusions, Laeken European Council, 15 December 2001
2. section I. For the constitutional dimension of Treaty amendments see I. Pernice, 'Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution-making Revisited?' (1999) 36 CML Rev, pp. 703-50;
3. and I. Pernice, 'Europäisches und nationales Verfassungsrecht' (2001) 60 Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, pp. 148-93;
4. for specific issues on the post-Nice agenda see D. Thym, 'European Constitutional Theory and the Post-Nice Process' in Andenas and Usher (eds), The Treaty Of Nice, Enlargement and Constitutional Reform (2003, forthcoming).
5. nd de Búrca, 'The Institutional Development of the EU: A Constitutional Analysis' in Craig and de Búrca (eds), The Evolution of EU Law (1999), pp. 55-81. Specifically on European foreign policy, see
6. Ginsburg, 'The EU's CFSP: The Politics of Procedure' in Holland (ed.), Common Foreign and Security Policy: The Record and Reforms (1997), pp. 297-318;
7. Smith, 'Diplomacy by Decree: The Legalization of Foreign Policy' (2001) 39 JCMSt, pp. 79-104 a
8. nd Roloff, 'Die Außenbeziehungen der Europäischen Union zwischen Globalisierung und Regionalisierung' (2001) 11 Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, pp. 1045-72.
9. See Norman, 'Solana Hits at EU-Strategies', Financial Times, 23 January 2001, p. 2;
10. Zecchini, 'Javier Solana dresse un bilan accablant des stratégies communes', Le Monde, 24 January 2001, p. 3.
11. Gomez, Peterson, 'The EU's Impossibly Busy Foreign Ministers: “No One is in Control”' (2001) 1 EFA Rev, pp. 53-74.
12. In spring 2002, 64% of the respondents to the eurobarometer survey supported the principle of a common foreign and security policy, while 20% were against it. In almost all Member States, there was a clear majority in favour, except in the UK, where opinion was divided; see eurobarometer 57 .