The Clinton legacy on ballistic missile defense

Comparative Strategy

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 201-219

  Clark, Mark T ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937322611     PISSN: 01495933     EISSN: 15210448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01495930008403209     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Mark T. Clark, "The Future of Clinton's Foreign and Defense Policy: Multilateral Security," Comparative Strategy, vol. 13, no. 2, Spring 1994, pp. 181-196
2. Mark T. Clark, "The Trouble with Collective Security," Orbis: A Journal of World Affairs, vol. 39, no. 2, Spring 1995, pp. 237-258.
3. Mark T. Clark, "Arms Control is Not Enough," Orbis: A Journal of World Affairs, vol. 40, no. 1, Winter 1996, pp. 71-84
4. Mark T. Clark, "The ABM Treaty Interpretation Dispute: Partial Analyses and the Forgotten Context," Global Affairs, vol. 2, no. 3, Summer 1987, pp. 58-79
5. Beth A. Fischer, The Reagan Reversal: Foreign Policy and the End of the Cold War, Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1997.
6. Andrei Kortunov and Andrei Shoumikhin, "Current Russian Objections to U.S. NMD and ABM Treaty Revisions, Comparative Strategy, vol. 16, no. 2, April-June 1997, pp. 157-166
7. Yuri Chkanikov, "Russian Security Requirements and the Limited NMD System: Is Accommodation Possible?" Comparative Strategy, vol. 17, no. 3, July-Sept. 1998, pp. 291-307.
8. Bill Gertz, "Nuclear Nightmare (Part Two),"in Betrayal: How the Clinton Administration Undermined American Security, Washington, DC: Regnery, 1999, pp. 53-80
9. White House, A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, July 1994, p. 12.
10. Steven A. Hildreth, The ABM Treaty and Theater Missile Defense: Proposed Changes and Potential Implications, CRS Report 94-374 F, Washington, DC: U.S. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, 2 May 1994.
11. Steven A. Hildreth, Theater Missile Defense: Issues for the 104th Congress, CRS Issue Brief IB95012, Washington, DC: U.S. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, 9 June 1995, p. 10.
12. Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough, "Inside the Ring," The Washington Times, 24 March 2000
13. George Miron and Douglas J. Feith, Memorandum of Law, No. 99-P 11 (attachment), Washington, DC: Center for Security Policy, 22 January 1999.
14. Thomas Moore and Baker Spring, The Senate's Right to Approve ABM Treaty Changes Must be Upheld, Executive Memorandum no. 479, Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation, 12 May 1997.
15. Bill Gertz, "Probe urged of missile-threat report," Washington Times, 29 February 1996, p. A12
16. Floyd Spence, "Missile Defense Vacuity," Washington Times, 29 February 1996, p. A20.
17. Mark T. Clark, "Restoring Competitive Intelligence," Strategic Review, vol. 25, no. 2, Spring 1997, pp. 74-77.
18. Bill Gertz, "Missile Purchase Violates U.S. Laws; Cairo Sold Scuds by North Korea," Washington Times, 21-23 June 1996.
19. Bill Gertz, "Clinton's Veto Blocks Sanctions on Russia," Washington Times, 24 June 1998
20. Bill Gertz, "Pakistan's Missile Program Aided by North Korea," Washington Times, 14 September 1998.
21. Mark T. Clark, 'The Big Uneasy," National Review West, 26 March 1996
22. Richard Kokoski, Technology and the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 34.
23. Walter Pincus, "Buried Missile Labs Foil U.S. Satellites," Washington Post, 29 July 1998, p. A1.
24. Selig Harrison and Geoffrey Kemp, India and America After the Cold War, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1993, p. 20.
25. Larry A. Niksch, North Korea's Nuclear Weapons Program, CRS Issue Brief, IB91141, Washington, DC: U.S. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, 9 January 1995
26. Alexandre Y. Mansourov, "The Origins, Evolution, and Current Politics of the North Korean Nuclear Program," The Nonproliferation Review, vol. 2, no. 3, Spring-Summer 1995, pp. 25-38
27. Thomas L. Wilborn, Strategic Implications of the U.S.- DPRK Framework Agreement, Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, 3 April 1995, Appendix A.
28. Bill Gertz, "China Threatens U.S. with Missile Strikes," Washington Times, internet: [www.washtimes.com] accessed 29 February 2000.
29. Mark T. Clark, "Emerging Security Threats," Orbis: A Journal of World Affairs, vol. 42, no. 1, Winter 1998, pp. 121-130
30. Peter V. Pry, War Scare: Russia and America on the Nuclear Brink (Conn.: Praeger, 1999).
31. Bill Gertz, "India Blasts Take U.S. Intelligence by Surprise," The Washington Times, 12 May 1998
32. Richard D. Fisher, India's Nuclear Blasts: A Reminder of America's Vulnerability, Executive Memorandum, no. 527, Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation, 19 May 1998.
33. Henry A. Kissinger, "Hyperbole Is Not a Nonproliferation Policy," Los Angeles Times, 7 June 1998, p. M1.
34. Rowan Scarborough and Bill Gertz, "North Korea Fires New Missile over Japanese Airspace," Washington Times, 1 September 1998
35. David Hirst, "Saddam's Latest Gambit Viewed as Genuine Challenge to U.N.," Washington Times, 2 November 1998.
36. George F. Will, "The Illusion of Arms Control," Washington Post, 3 September 1998, p. A1.
37. Bill Clinton, Joint Press Conference of the President and Prime Minister D'Alema of Italy, 5 March 1999, Washington, DC: The White House.
38. Baker Spring, Calling the Pentagon's Bluff on Defense Review, Backgrounder, Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation, 18 June 1997
39. Bill Gertz, "Missile Defense Survives Veto Threat," Washington Times, 17 March 1999.
40. Thomas Moore, White House Steps Back from National Missile Defense— Again, Executive Memorandum, no. 589, Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation, 8 April 1999.
41. Brian T. Kennedy, "Clinton Administration's Forked-Tongued Defense Initiative," from internet: [www.claremont.org], accessed 4 June 1999