A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing High flow therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for preterm infants with respiratory distress (the HIPSTER trial): Study protocol

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Roberts, Calum T ^a,b   Owen, Louise S ^a,b,c   Manley, Brett J ^a,b   Donath, Susan M ^b,c   Davis, Peter G ^a,b,c  

^a ROYAL WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c MURDOCH CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APNEA; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; ASSISTED VENTILATION; BLOOD GAS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HIGH FLOW THERAPY; HOSPITAL CARE; HUMAN; INFANT; INTUBATION; LUNG DYSPLASIA; MULTICENTER STUDY; NOSE INJURY; OXYGENATION; PARENTAL STRESS; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREMATURITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS; TREATMENT FAILURE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLICATION; FEMALE; INTRANASAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; NEWBORN; OXYGEN THERAPY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCEDURES; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN; RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRANASAL; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; MALE; OXYGEN INHALATION THERAPY; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN; RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84937202531     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008483     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 2012;379:2162-72.
2. Fanaroff AA, Stoll BJ, Wright LL, et al. Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:147 e1-8.
3. Chess PR, D'Angio CT, Pryhuber GS, et al. Pathogenesis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol 2006;30:171-8.
4. Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ. Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003(2): CD000143.
5. Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC, et al. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1970-9.
6. Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, et al. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2008;358:700-8.
7. Dunn MS, Kaempf J, De Klerk A, et al. Randomized trial comparing 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2011;128:e1069-76.
8. Buckmaster AG, Arnolda G, Wright IM, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure therapy for infants with respiratory distress in non tertiary care centers: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2007;120:509-18.
9. Robertson NJ, McCarthy LS, Hamilton PA, et al. Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway pressure. Archives of disease in childhood Fetal and neonatal edition 1996;75:F209-12.
10. Jaile JC, Levin T, Wung JT, et al. Benign gaseous distension of the bowel in premature infants treated with nasal continuous airway pressure: a study of contributing factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:125-7.
11. Hochwald O, Osiovich H. High flow nasal cannulae in neonatal intensive care units: is clinical practice consistent with the evidence. Paper presented at: PAS Annual Meeting; 1-4 May 2010; Vancouver, British Columbia, 2010.
12. Hough JL, Shearman AD, Jardine LA, et al. Humidified high flow nasal cannulae: current practice in Australasian nurseries, a survey. J Paediatr Child Health 2012;48:106-13.
13. Nath P, Ponnusamy V, Willis K, et al. Current practices of high and low flow oxygen therapy and humidification in UK neonatal units. Pediatr Int 2010;52:893-4.
14. Manley BJ, Owen L, Doyle LW, et al. High-flow nasal cannulae and nasal continuous positive airway pressure use in non-tertiary special care nurseries in Australia and New Zealand. J Paediatr Child Health 2012;48:16-21.
15. Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O'Donnell CP, et al. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011(5): CD006405.
16. Waugh JB, Granger WM. An evaluation of 2 new devices for nasal high-flow gas therapy. Respir Care 2004;49:902-6.
17. Manley BJ, Dold SK, Davis PG, et al. High-flow nasal cannulae for respiratory support of preterm infants: a review of the evidence. Neonatology 2012;102:300-8.
18. Collins CL, Holberton JR, Barfield C, et al. A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants. J Pediatr 2013;162:949-54 e1.
19. Manley BJ, Owen LS, Doyle LW, et al. High-flow nasal cannulae in very preterm infants after extubation. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1425-33.
20. Yoder BA, Stoddard RA, Li M, et al. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics 2013;131:e1482-90.
21. Shoemaker MT, Pierce MR, Yoder BA, et al. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective study. J Perinatol 2007;27:85-91.
22. Lampland AL, Plumm B, Meyers PA, et al. Observational study of humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr 2009;154:177-82.
23. Sivieri EM, Gerdes JS, Abbasi S. Effect of HFNC flow rate, cannula size, and nares diameter on generated airway pressures: an in vitro study. Pediatr Pulmonol 2012.
24. Spence KL, Murphy D, Kilian C, et al. High-flow nasal cannula as a device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants. J Perinatol 2007;27:772-5.
25. Wilkinson DJ, Andersen CC, Smith K, et al. Pharyngeal pressure with high-flow nasal cannulae in premature infants. J Perinatol 2008;28:42-7.
26. Jhung MA, Sunenshine RH, Noble-Wang J, et al. A national outbreak of Ralstonia mannitolilytica associated with use of a contaminated oxygen-delivery device among pediatric patients. Pediatrics 2007;119:1061-8.
27. Klingenberg C, Pettersen M, Hansen EA, et al. Patient comfort during treatment with heated humidified high flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomised cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014;99:F134-7.
28. Roberts CT, Manley BJ, Dawson JA, et al. Nursing perceptions of high-flow nasal cannulae treatment for very preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health 2014;50:806-10.
29. Osman M, Elsharkawy A, Abdel-Hady H. Assessment of pain during application of nasal-continuous positive airway pressure and heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannulae in preterm infants. J Perinatol 2015;35:263-7.
30. Miles MS, Funk SG, Carlson J. Parental Stressor Scale: neonatal intensive care unit. Nurs Res 1993;42:148-52.
31. Schmidt B, Roberts RS, Davis P, et al. Caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2112-21.
32. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, et al. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA 2012;308:2594-604.
33. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-81.