Perceptions of the eCrime controllers: Modelling the influence of cooperation and data source factors

Security Journal

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 252-271

  Williams, Matthew ^a   Levi, Michael ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cooperation; eCrime; information assurance; information sharing; partnership

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937202364     PISSN: 09551662     EISSN: 17434645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/sj.2012.47     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ACPO. (2009) ACPO e-Crime Strategy. London: ACPO, www.acpo.police.uk/documents/crime/2009/200908 CRIECS01.pdf, accessed 9 October 2012.
2. Anderson, R., Boehme, R., Clayton, R. and Moore, T. (2008) Security Economics and the Internal Market. Heraklion, Greece: ENISA.
3. Anderson, R. et al (2012) Measuring the Cost of Cybercrime. London: Ministry of Defence.
4. Blom-Cooper, L. and Drabble, R. (1982) Police perception of crime: Brixton and the operational response. British Journal of Criminology 22 (2): 184-187.
5. Cabinet Offi ce. (2011) The UK Cyber Security Strategy: Protecting and Promoting the UK in a Digital World. London: Cabinet Office.
6. Carr-Hill, R. A. and Stern, N. (1979) Crime, the Police and Criminal Statistics: An Analysis of Offi cial Statistics for England and Wales Using Econometric Methods, Quantitative Studies in Social Relations. London: Academic Press.
7. Casper, C. (2007) Examining the Feasibility of a Data Collection Framework. Heraklion, Greece: ENISA.
8. Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Council of the European Union. (2000) Proposal for the extension of Europol's mandate to the fi ght against cybercrime. Note from Presidency to Article 36 Committee. http://www.statewatch.org/semdoc/assets/fi les/council/12224-00.pdf, accessed 5 October 2012.
10. CrySyS Lab. (2012) sKyWIper (a.k.a. Flame a.k.a. Flamer): A complex Malware for targeted attacks. Laboratory of Cryptography and Systems Security: Budapest University of Technology and Economics. http://www.crysys.hu/skywiper/skywiper.pdf.
11. Dorofeev, S. and Grant, P. (2006) Statistics for Real-Life Sample Surveys: Non-simple random Samples and Weighted Data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Empirica. (2007) Benchmarking in a Policy Perspective: Security and Confi dence. Report No.8. Brussels: Empirica.
13. Farwell, J. and Rohozinski, R. (2011) Stuxnet and the future of cyber war. S urvival 53 (1): 23-40.
14. Garlik. (2009) UK Cybercrime Report 2009. London: Experian.
15. Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
16. Grabosky, P. and Smith, R. (2001) Digital crime in the twenty-fi rst century. Journal of Information Ethics 10 (1): 8-26.
17. Greer, C. and Reiner, R. (2012) Mediated Mayhem: Media, crime and criminal justice. In: M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 5th edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 245-278.
18. HM Government. (2010) A Strong Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The National Security Strategy. London: The Stationery Offi ce.
19. HM Government. (2011) Strategic Defence and Security Review: The First Annual Report. London: The Stationery Offi ce.
20. Hyde-Bales, K., Morris, S. and Charlton, A. (2004) The Police Recording of Computer Crime. London: The Stationery Offi ce.
21. i2010 High Level Group. (2006) Benchmarking Framework. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
22. Jewkes, Y. and Yar, M. (2010) Handbook of Internet Crime. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
23. Johnston, L. and Shearing, C. (2003) G overning Security: Explorations in Policing and Justice. London: Routledge.
24. Kaiser, P. (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39 (1): 31-36.
25. Levi, M. and Williams, M. (2012) eCrime Reduction Partnership Mapping Study. London: Nomient Trust.
26. Mohan, J., Twigg, L. and Taylor, J. (2011) Mind the double gap: Using multivariate multilevel modelling to investigate public perceptions of crime trends. British Journal of Criminology 51 (6): 1035-1053.
27. National Statistician. (2011) National Statistician's Review of Crime Statistics: England and Wales. London: Government Statistical Service.
28. PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2012) Information Security Breaches Survey. London: PwC.
29. Sommer and Brown. (2011) Reducing Systemic Cybersecurity Risk. London: OECD.
30. Symantec. (2012) Internet Security Threat Report, Volume 17. Mountain View, CA: Symantec.
31. Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2013) Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
32. U.N. Commission on Crime and Criminal Justice. (1995) U nited Nations Manual on the Prevention and Control of Computer-related Crime. New York: United Nations.
33. Walker, C. and Akdeniz, Y. (1998) The governance of the internet in Europe with special reference to illegal and harmful content. T he Criminal Law Review, Special Edition on Crime, Criminal Justice and the Internet, 5-18.
34. Wall, D. S. (2007) Cybercrimes: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age. Cambridge: Polity.
35. Wall, D. S. and Williams, M. (2007) Policing diversity in the digital age: Maintaining order in virtual communities. Criminology and Criminal Justice 7 (4): 391-415.
36. Williams, M. (2006) Policing & cyber-society: The maturation of regulation within an online community. Policing & Society 17 (1): 59-82.
37. Williams, M. (2010) Cybercrime. In: F. Brookman, M. Maguire, H. Pierpoint and T. Bennett (eds.) H andbook of Crime. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
38. Yar, M. (2006) Cybercrime and Society. London: Sage.