‘The canary in the coalmine’: The nonaccommodation cycle in the gendered workplace

International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom)

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 223-245

  Boggs, Cathy ^a   Giles, Howard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937189040     PISSN: 08026106     EISSN: 14734192     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.1999.tb00174.x     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Acker, J. (1991) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. In J. Lorber & S.A. Farrell, The social construction of gender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 162–79.
2. Astrachan, A. (1989) How men feel: dividing lines. In L. Kramer, The sociology of gender. New York: St. Martin's. 61–72.
3. Baker, M.A. (1991) Reciprocal accommodation: A model for reducing gender bias in managerial communication. Journal of Business Communication 28: 113–30.
4. Benokraitis, N.V. (ed.) (1997) Subtle sexism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Berger, C.R. (in press) Miscommunication and communication failure. In W.P. Robinson & H. Giles, The new handbook of language and social psychology. Chichester, England: Wiley.
6. Bielby, W.T. & Baron, J.N. (1984) A woman's place is with other women: sex segregation within organizations. In B.F. Reskin, Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies. Washington: National Academy Press. 27–55.
7. Boggs, C. (1998a) Communication and gender relations in the workplace: A structuration approach to understanding the persistence of organizational sex discrimination. In G.A. Barnett, Organizational communication: emerging perspectives 6. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 47–66.
8. Boggs, C. (1998b) Equal employment opportunity, communication accommodation climate and the gender structuration of organizations: Development and test of a model for understanding the dynamics of male resistance to workplace gender integration. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
9. Borman, E.G., Pratt, J. & Putnam, L. (1978) Power, authority, and sex: male response to female leadership. Communication Monographs 45: 119–55.
10. Bourhis, R.Y. (1989) Bilingual communication in organizational settings: Aspects of the Canadian case. In S. Ting-Toomey & F. Korzenny, Language, communication, and culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 244–64.
11. Bourhis, R.Y. (1991) Organizational communication and accommodation: Toward some conceptual and empirical links. In H. Giles, J. Coupland & N. Coupland, Contexts of accommodation: developments in applied sociolinguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press. 270–303.
12. Braun, S. (1998, June 12) Mitsubishi to pay $34 million in sex harassment case. Los Angeles Times: A1, 18.
13. Burrell, G. (1992) Sex and organizational analysis. In A.J. Mills & P. Tancred, Gendering organizational analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 71–92.
14. Burrell, G. & Hearn, J. (1989) The sexuality of organization. In J. Hearn, D.L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff & G. Burrell, The sexuality of organization. London: Sage. 1–28.
15. Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (in press) Towards a social theory of gender. In W.P. Robinson & H. Giles, The new handbook of language and social psychology. Chichester, England: Wiley.
16. Collinson, D.L., & Collinson, M. (1989) Sexuality in the workplace: The domination of men's sexuality. In J. Hearn, D.L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff & G. Burrell, The sexuality of organization. London: Sage. 91–109.
17. Coupland, N. & Giles, H. (1988) Introduction: The communicative contexts of accommodation. Language and Communication 8: 109–33.
18. Coupland, N. Wiemann, J.M. & Giles, H. (1991) Talk as “problem” and communication as “miscommunication”: An integrative analysis. In N. Coupland, H. Giles & J.M. Wiemann, Miscommunication and problematic talk. Newbury Park: Sage. 1–17.
19. Davis, D.L. (1993) When men become “women”: gender antagonism and the changing sexual geography of work in Newfoundland. Sex Roles 29: 457–75.
20. DiTomaso, N. (1989) Sexuality in the workplace: discrimination and harassment. In J. Hearn, D.L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff & G. Burrell, The sexuality of organization. London: Sage. 71–90.
21. Dubé-Simard, L. (1983) Genesis of social categorization, threat to identity and perception of social injustice: Their role in intergroup communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 2: 183–205.
22. Eakin, E. (1998, March) Liberté, egalité, paritél Lingua Franca 8: 68–72.
23. England, P. & Dunn, D. (1988) Evaluating work and comparable worth. American Review of Sociology 14: 227–48.
24. Fairhurst, G.T. (1986) Male-female communication on the job: literature review and commentary. In M.L. McLaughlin, Communication Yearbook 9. Newbury Park: Sage. 83–116.
25. Faludi, S. (1991) Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Anchor.
26. Fernandez, J.P. (1981) Racism and sexism in corporate life. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
27. Fox, S. & Giles, H. (1993) Accommodating intergenerational contact: A critique and theoretical model. Journal of Aging Studies 7: 423–51.
28. Fox, S. & Giles, H. (1996) Interability communication: evaluating patronizing encounters. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15: 265–90.
29. Gallois, C. & Callan, V.J. (1991) Interethnic accommodation: The role of norms. In H. Giles, N. Coupland & J. Coupland, Contexts of accommodation: developments in applied sociolinguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press. 245–69.
30. Gallois, C. & Giles, H. (1998) Accommodating mutual influence. In M. Palmer, Mutual influence in interpersonal communication. New York: Ablex. 135–62.
31. Gallois, C. Jones, E., Cargile, A.C. & Ota, H. (1995) Accommodating intercultural encounters. In R.L. Wiseman, Intercultural communication theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 115–47.
32. Giles, H. (ed.) (1984) The dynamics of speech accommodation. SpecialIssue of International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46.
33. Giles, H. Coupland, J. & Coupland, N. (1991) Accommodation theory: communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland, Contexts of accommodation: developments in applied sociolinguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1–68.
34. Giles, H. Coupland, J. & Coupland, N. (1991) Language: contexts and consequences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
35. Giles, H. Coupland, J. & Johnson, P. (1987) Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 68: 69–99.
36. Giles, H. Coupland, J. & Noels, K. (1997) Communication accommodation in intercultural encounters. In J. Martin, T. Nakayama & L. Flores, Readings in cultural contexts. Mountain View: Mayfield. 139–49.
37. Giles, H. Coupland, J. & Wadleigh, P.M. (1999) Accommodating nonverbally. In L.K. Guerrero, J.A. DeVito & M.L. Hecht, The nonverbal communication reader: Classic and contemporary readings [2nd edition]. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. 425–36.
38. Greenlaw, P.S. (1985) Affirmative action or reverse discrimination Personnel Journal 64: 84–87.
39. Gutek, B.A. (1989) Sexuality in the workplace: key issues in social research and organizational practice. In J. Hearn, D.L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff & G. Burrell, The sexuality of organization. London: Sage. 56–70.
40. Harragan, B.L. (1977) Games mother never taught you. New York: Warner Books.
41. Hearn, J. & Parkin, P.W. (1988) Women, men, and leadership: A critical review of assumptions, practices, and change in industrialized nations. In N.J. Adler & D. Izraeli, Women in management worldwide. New York: M.E. Sharpe. 17–40.
42. Heilman, M.E., Block, C.J. & Lucas, J.A. (1992) Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology 77: 536–44.
43. Heilman, M.E., Block, C.J. & Stathatos, P. (1997) The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: effects of performance information ambiguity. Academy of Management Journal 40: 603–25.
44. Henley, N.M. & Kramarae, C. (1991) Gender, power, and miscommunication. In N. Coupland, J.M. Wiemann & H. Giles, “Miscommunication” and problematic talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 18–43.
45. Hewstone, M. & Brown, P. (1986) Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the contact hypothesis. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown, Intergroup contact. Oxford: Blackwell. 1–44.
46. Hewstone, M. & Giles, H. (1986) Social groups and social stereotypes in intergroup communication: A review and model of intergroup communication breakdown. In W.B. Gudykunst, Intergroup communication. London: Edward Arnold. 10–26.
47. Hogg, M.A., D'Agata, P. & Abrams, D. (1989) Ethnolinguistic betrayal and speaker evaluations among Italian Australians. Genetic, Social, and General Psychological Monographs 115: 155–81.
48. Ibarra, H. (1992) Homophily and differential returns: sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 422–47.
49. Ranter, R.M. (1977) Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
50. Kearney, K.G. & White, T.I. (1994) Men and women at work. New York: Career.
51. Kipnis, A. & Herron, E. (1994) Gender war/gender peace: The quest for love and justice between women and men. New York: Morrow.
52. Kupers, T.A. (1993) Revisioning men's lives: gender, intimacy, and power. New York: Guilford.
53. Leonard, J.S. (1989) Women and affirmative action. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 61–75.
54. Maltz, D.N. & Borker, R. (1982) A cultural approach to male—female communication. In J.J. Gumperz, Language and social identity. Cambridge University Press. 195–216.
55. Marshall, J. (1993) Viewing organizational communication from a feminist perspective: A critique and some offerings. In S.A. Deetz, Communication Yearbook 14. Newbury Park: Sage. 122–43.
56. Maupin, R.J. (1993) How can women's lack of upward mobility in accounting organizations be explained Group and Organization Management 18: 132–152.
57. Mehren, E. (1997, Jan 24) Outrage at the Citadel. Los Angeles Times: E-1.
58. Mills, A.J. (1989) Gender, sexuality, and organization theory. In J. Hearn, D.L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff, & G. Burrell, The sexuality of organization. London: Sage. 29–44.
59. Mills, A.J. (1992) Organization, gender, and culture. In A.J. Mills & P. Tancred, Gendering organizational analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 93–111.
60. Milwid, B. (1990) Working with men. New York: Berkley Books.
61. Morrison, J.E. (1994) Colorblindness, individuality, and merit: An analysis of the rhetoric against affirmative action. Iowa Law Review 79: 313–366.
62. Mulac, A., Erlandson, K.T., Farrar, W.J., Hallett, J., Molloy, J. & Prescott, M. (1998) “Uh-huh. What's that all about?” Differing interpretations of conversational backchannels and questions as sources of miscommunication across gender boundaries. Communication Research 25: 641–68.
63. Mumby, D. (1993) Feminism and the critique of organizational communication studies. In S.A. Deetz, Communication yearbook 16. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 155–166.
64. Murray, S.B. (1997) It's safer this way: The subtle and not-so-subtle exclusion of men in child care. In N.V. Benokraitis, Subtle sexism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 136–53.
65. Nieva, V.F. & Gutek, B.A. (1982) Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Praeger.
66. Ng, S.H. (1990) Language and control. In H. Giles & W.P. Robinson, Handbook of language and social psychology. Chichester: Wiley. 271–88.
67. Petronio, S., Ellemers, N., Giles, H., Giles, H. & Gallois, C. (1998) (Mis)communicating across boundaries: interpersonal and intergroup consideration. Communication Research 25: 571–95.
68. Pollert, A. (1981) Girls, wives, factory lives. London: Macmillan.
69. Pringle, R. (1989) Bureaucracy, rationality and sexuality: The case of secretaries. In J. Hearn, D.L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff & G. Burrell, The sexuality of organization. London: Sage. 158–77.
70. Ragins, B.R. (1989) Barriers to mentoring: The female manager's dilemma. Human Relations 42: 1–22.
71. Reardon, K. (1993) The memo every woman has on her desk. Harvard Business Review 71: 16–22.
72. Reskin, B.F. & Hartmann, H. (eds.) (1986) Women's work, men's work: sex segregation on the job. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press.
73. Reskin, B.F. & Roos, P.A. (1990) Job queues, gender queues. Philadelphia: Temple University.
74. Rosenbaum, J.E. (1985) Jobs, job status, and women's gains from affirmative action: implications for comparable worth. In H.I. Hartmann, Comparable worth: New directions for research. Washington: National Academy Press. 116–36.
75. Ryan, E.B., Hummert, M.L. & Boich, L.H. (1995) Communication predicaments of aging: patronizing behavior toward older adults. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14: 144–66.
76. San Antonio, P.M. (1987) Social mobility and language use in an American company in Japan. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 6: 191–200.
77. Shepard, C., Giles, H. & Le Poire, B. (in press) Accommodating language 25 years on. In W.P. Robinson & H. Giles, The new handbook of language and social psychology. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
78. Shepherd, D.L. (1989) Organizations, power and sexuality: The image and self-image of women managers. In J. Hearn, D.L. Sheppard, P. Tancred-Sheriff, & G. Burrell, The sexuality of organization. London: Sage. 139–157.
79. Skevington, S. & Baker, D. (eds.) (1989) The social identity of women. London: Sage.
80. Strine, M.S. (1992) Understanding “how things work”: sexual harassment and academic culture. Journal of Applied Communication Research 20: 391–400.
81. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup relations. In W. Austin & S. Worchel, Psychology of intergroup relations [2nd edition]. Chicago: Nelson Hall. 7–17.
82. Tannen, D. (1993, June 20) Wears jump suit. Sensible shoes. Uses husband's last name. New York Times Magazine: 18, 52–54.
83. Tannen, D. (1994) Talking from nine to five. New York: W. Morrow.
84. Taylor, B. & Conrad, C. (1992) Narratives of sexual harassment: organizational dimensions. Journal of Applied Communication Research 20: 401–18.
85. Turner, J.C. & Brown, R. (1978) Social status, cognitive alternatives and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel, Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press. 201–34.
86. Williams, J. & Giles, H. (1978) The changing status of women in society: An intergroup perspective. In H. Tajfel, Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press. 431–65.