Mapping the Cu-BTC metal-organic framework (HKUST-1) stability envelope in the presence of water vapour for CO2 adsorption from flue gases

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 281, Issue , 2015, Pages 669-677

  Al Janabi, Nadeen ^a   Hill, Patrick ^a   Torrente Murciano, Laura ^b   Garforth, Arthur ^a   Gorgojo, Patricia ^a   Siperstein, Flor ^a   Fan, Xiaolei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Flue gas; HKUST 1; Hydrothermal synthesis; Metal organic frameworks (MOFs); Stability; Water vapour adsorption

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; COPPER; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; FLUE GASES; FLUES; GAS ADSORPTION; ORGANIC POLYMERS; ORGANOMETALLICS; STABILITY; WATER VAPOR;

ADSORPTION CAPACITIES; ADSORPTION EXPERIMENT; HKUST-1; IRREVERSIBLE DECOMPOSITION; METAL ORGANIC FRAMEWORK; METALORGANIC FRAMEWORKS (MOFS); QUANTITATIVE YIELDS; WATER VAPOUR;

HYDROTHERMAL SYNTHESIS;

EID: 84937127635     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.020     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Sabouni R., Kazemian H., Rohani S. Carbon dioxide capturing technologies: a review focusing on metal organic framework materials (MOFs). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21:5427-5449.
2. Lu A.-H., Hao G.-P. Porous Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture 2014, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
3. 2. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:908-916.
4. Jecht U. Flue Gas Analysis in Industry 2004, TESTO, USA, p. 16. second ed.
5. 2 capture from flue gases using pressure swing adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47:4883-4890.
6. 2 from flue gas: a review. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 40:321-348.
7. 2 capture by carbon nanotubes, activated carbons, and zeolites. Energy Fuels 2008, 22:3050-3056.
8. Bonenfant D., Kharoune M., Niquette P., Mimeault M., Hausler R. Advances in principal factors influencing carbon dioxide adsorption on zeolites. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2008, 9:013007.
9. 2 capture by metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41:2308-2322.
10. Schneemann A., Bon V., Schwedler I., Senkovska I., Kaskel S., Fischer R.A. Flexible metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43:6062-6096.
11. n. Science 1999, 283:1148-1150.
12. MinWang Q., Shen D., Bülow M., LingLau M., Deng S., Fitch F.R., Lemcoff N.O., Semanscin J. Metallo-organic molecular sieve for gas separation and purification. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2002, 55:217-230.
13. 2: an effective activation procedure. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111:9305-9313.
14. Simmons J.M., Wu H., Zhou W., Yildirim T. Carbon capture in metal-organic frameworks - a comparative study. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4:2177-2185.
15. 2 uptake by HKUST-1 metal-organic framework via a simple chemical treatment. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014, 183:69-73.
16. Lin K.-S., Adhikari A.K., Ku C.-N., Chiang C.-L., Kuo H. Synthesis and characterization of porous HKUST-1 metal organic frameworks for hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:13865-13871.
17. 2: a new metal-organic framework with a versatile functionality. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48:11196-11198.
18. 2O)]. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010, 132:121-127.
19. Lee Y.-R., Ahn W.-S., Kim J. Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks: a mini review. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2013, 30:1667-1680.
20. 2. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2004, 73:81-88.
21. Biemmi E., Christian S., Stock N., Bein T. High-throughput screening of synthesis parameters in the formation of the metal-organic frameworks MOF-5 and HKUST-1. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 117:111-117.
22. 2 from Cu(II)-trimesate mixture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 119:331-337.
23. 2 at ambient temperature and pressure: an efficient and environmentally friendly method. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63:78-80.
24. 2 for hydrogen storage. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2011, 143:37-45.
25. 2-MOF and its catalytic application to chemical reduction. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 168:57-64.
26. Peikert K., Hoffmann F., Fröba M. Fluorine magic: one new organofluorine linker leads to three new metal-organic frameworks. CrystEngComm 2014, 17:353-360.
27. Schoenecker P.M., Carson C.G., Jasuja H., Flemming C.J.J., Walton K.S. Effect of water adsorption on retention of structure and surface area of metal-organic frameworks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51:6513-6519.
28. Castillo J.M., Vlugt T.J.H., Calero S. Understanding water adsorption in Cu-BTC metal-organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112:15934-15939.
29. Calero S., Gomez-Alvarez P. Insights into the adsorption of water and small alcohols on the open-metal sites of Cu-BTC via molecular simulation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119:467-472.
30. Jose J., Gutierrez-Sevillano S., Calero R. Krishna, Selective adsorption of water from mixtures with 1-alcohols by exploitation of molecular packing effects in Cu-BTC. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119:3658-3666.
31. 13C solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13:7783-7788.
32. Küsgens P., Rose M., Senkovska I., Fröde H., Henschel A., Siegle S., Kaskel S. Characterization of metal-organic frameworks by water adsorption. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 120:325-330.
33. 1H MAS NMR. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 180:8-13.
34. Rezk A., Al-Dadah R., Mahmoud S., Elsayed A. Characterisation of metal organic frameworks for adsorption cooling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 2012, 55:7366-7374.
35. 2 (BTC=benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate). Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12:7353-7363.
36. 2: an effective activation procedure. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111:9305-9313.
37. 2. Langmuir 2008, 24:8634-8642.
38. 2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47:8929-8932.
39. 2 immobilized amino-functionalized basic ionic liquid catalyst. Appl. Catal. A 2014, 478:81-90.
40. 2 in the total oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Appl. Catal. B 2013, 132-133:116-122.
41. Bell T.E., Gonzalez-Carballo J.M., Tooze R.P., Torrente-Murciano L. Single-step synthesis of nanostructured gamma-alumina with solvent reusability to maximise yield and morphological purity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3:6196-6201.
42. 2 capture. RSC Adv. 2013, 3:25360-25366.
43. Sánchez M., Rams J., Ureña A. Oxidation mechanisms of copper and nickel coated carbon fibers. Oxid. Met. 2008, 69:327-341.
44. 2O nanospheres: optical properties and thermal behavior. Microsc. Microanal. 2015, 21:108-119.
45. 2 from flue gases in Cu-BTC metal-organic framework. AIChE J. 2007, 53:2832-2840.
46. Schwarz J.A., Contescu C.I. Surfaces of Nanoparticles and Porous Materials 1999, CRC Press, New York.
47. McKetta J.J. Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design: Volume 6 - Calcination Equipment to Catalysis 1978, CRC Press, New York.
48. Müllera E.A., Gubbins K.E. Molecular simulation study of hydrophilic and hydrophobic behavior of activated carbon surfaces. Carbon 1998, 36:1433-1438.
49. Zhao Z., Wang S., Yang Y., Li X., Li J., Li Z. Competitive adsorption and selectivity of benzene and water vapor on the microporous metal organic frameworks (HKUST-1). Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 259:79-89.
50. 2 uptake within mesoporous MIL-100(Fe). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134:10174-10181.
51. Tien C. Adsorption Calculations and Modeling 1994, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
52. Henninger S.K., Schmidt F.P., Henning H.M. Water adsorption characteristics of novel materials for heat transformation applications. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2010, 30:1692-1702.
53. Zhang W., Hu Y., Ge J., Jiang H.-L., Yu S.-H. A facile and general coating approach to moisture/water-resistant metal-organic frameworks with intact porosity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136:16978-16981.
54. Kole G.K., Vittal J.J. Solid-state reactivity and structural transformations involving coordination polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42:1755-1775.
55. Sun X., Li H., Li Y., Xu F., Xiao J., Xia Q., Li Y., Li Z. A novel mechanochemical method for reconstructing the moisture-degraded HKUST-1. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51:10835-10838.