FRAMEWORK for USER INVOLVEMENT in HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT at the LOCAL LEVEL: VIEWS of HEALTH MANAGERS, USER REPRESENTATIVES, and CLINICIANS

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 31, Issue 1-2, 2015, Pages 68-77

  Gagnon, Marie Pierre ^a,b   Desmartis, Marie ^b   Gagnon, Johanne ^a,c   St Pierre, Michèle ^a,d   Rhainds, Marc ^e   Coulombe, Martin ^e   Tantchou, Mylène Dipankui ^b   Légaré, France ^a,b,f  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b University Laval   (Canada)

^c Faculty of Nursing Sciences   (United States)

^d Depart of Management   (United States)

^e LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f Departments of Family Medicine   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; Elderly care; Health technology assessment; Hospital based HTA; Interviews; Mental health; User involvement

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH; HOSPITALS; MANAGERS;

CANADA; ELDERLY CARE; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; INTERVIEWS; MENTAL HEALTH; USER INVOLVEMENT;

SURVEYS;

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE ASSESSMENT; CANADA; CONSULTATION; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH MANAGER; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MANAGER; MISCELLANEOUS NAMED GROUPS; PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT; PHYSICIAN; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; USER REPRESENTATIVE; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUEBEC;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUEBEC; RESEARCH DESIGN; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 84937074385     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462315000070     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bridges JF, Jones C. Patient-based health technology assessment: A vision of the future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007; 23: 30-35
2. Coulter A. Perspectives on health technology assessment: Response from the patient's perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004; 20: 92-96
3. Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J, et al. Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010; 26: 334-340
4. Lehoux P, Williams-Jones B. Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007; 23: 9-16
5. Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Lepage-Savary D, et al. Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011; 27: 31-42
6. Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Gagnon J, et al. Introducing the patient's perspective in hospital health technology assessment (HTA): The views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients. Health Expect. 2014; 17: 888-900
7. Gauvin FP, Abelson J, Giacomini M, Eyles J, Lavis JN. "It all depends": Conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70: 1518-1526
8. Oliver SR, Rees RW, Clarke-Jones L, et al. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expect. 2008; 11: 72-84
9. Rowe G, Frewer LJ. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2005; 30: 251-90
10. Tritter JQ. Revolution or evolution: The challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world. Health Expect. 2009; 12: 275-287
11. Gagnon MP, Gagnon J, St-Pierre M, et al. Involving patients in HTA activities at local level: A study protocol based on the collaboration between researchers and knowledge users. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:14
12. NVivo 8. NVivo qualitative data analysis software; QSR International Pty Ltd, NVivo 8, 2008
13. Huberman AM, Miles MB. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed. ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994
14. Kelson M, Akl EA, Bastian H, et al. Integrating values and consumer involvement in guidelines with the patient at the center: Article 8 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An officialATS/ERSworkshop report. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012; 9: 262-268
15. Entwistle VA, Renfrew MJ, Yearley S, Forrester J, Lamont T. Lay perspectives: Advantages for health research. BMJ. 1998; 316: 463-466
16. Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: A systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166: 493-497
17. Nilsen ES, Myrhaug HT, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman AD. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006: CD004563
18. Craig GM. Involving users in developing health services. BMJ. 2008; 336: 286-287
19. Fudge N, Wolfe CD, McKevitt C. Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: Ethnographic study. BMJ. 2008; 336: 313-317