Case study window – Global cities: Governance cultures and urban policy in New York, Paris, Tokyo and Beijing

The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning and Culture

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 69-84

  Newman, Peter ^a   Thornley, Andy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937034493     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Abu-Lughod, J.L. 1999. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America's Global Cities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
2. Almond, G. and Verba, S. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Assemblée Nationale. 2010. Loi n.2010-597 du 3 juin 2010 relative au Grand Paris (1). [Online]. Available at: http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000022308227&dateTexte=#LEGIARTI000022309428 [accessed 4 April 2013].
4. Bagli, C. 2009. As finance offices empty, developers rethink ground zero. New York Times, April 15. [Online]. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/15/nyregion/15develop.html [accessed 4 April 2013].
5. Beijing Institute of Urban Planning and Design. 1993. Beijing Urban Master Plan (1991– 2010). Beijing: BIUPD.
6. Bowles, J. 2003. Slow Down on Far West Midtown. [Online]. Available at: http://www.nycfuture.org/content/articles/article_view.cfm?article_id=1068&article_type=5 [accessed 4 April 2013].
7. Broudehoux, A-M. 2004. The Making and Selling of Post-Mao Beijing. London: Routledge.
8. CEC. 2010. Territorial Cohesion: What Scales of Policy Intervention?. Follow up of Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion 2nd TCUM session. Brussels, 12 March 2010. [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/conferences/territorial/12032010/index_en.cfm [accessed 10 February 2012].
9. CESR (Conseil Economique et Social Régional). 2010. Quelles perspectives pour le Partenariat Public–Privé (PPP) et autres nouveaux modes de financement pour les investissements de la région Ile-De-France? [Online]. Available at: http://www.cesr-ile-de-france.fr/documents/rapport_pdf/rapport/09_fina_ppp/rapport-comment-financerinvestissements-region-ile-franc.pdf [accessed 4 April 2013].
10. Coates, D. 1999. Models of capitalism in the new world order: the UK case. Political Studies, 47(4), 643–60.
11. Cook, I. 2006. Beijing as an ‘internationalized metropolis’, in Globalization and the Chinese City, edited by F. Wu. London and New York: Routledge, 63–84.
12. Crawford, D. 2000. Chinese capitalism: cultures, the Southeast Asian region and economic globalization. Third World Quarterly, 21(1), 69–86.
13. Ding, X.L. 1994. Institutional amphibiousness and the transition from Communism: the case of China. British Journal of Political Science, 24(1), 293–318.
14. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15. Esping-Andersen, G. 1997. Hybrid or unique? The Japanese welfare state between Europe and America. Journal of European Social Policy, 7(3), 179–89.
16. Faludi, A. (ed.) 2007. Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute.
17. Fernandez, M. 2009. As city adds housing for poor, market subtracts it. New York Times, 15 October. [Online]. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/15/nyregion/15housing.html?pagewanted=all [accessed 4 April 2013].
18. Gaubatz, P. 2005. Globalization and the development of new central business districts in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, in Restructuring the Chinese City, edited by J.C. Ma and F. Wu. London and New York: Routledge, 87–108.
19. Gladstone, D. and Fainstein, S. 2001. Tourism in US global cities: a comparison of New York and Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(1), 23–40.
20. Gross, J.S. and Newman, P. 2005. Local Development and Political Opportunity in London and New York. ISA Research Committee 21 Conference, Paris, June.
21. Hampden-Turner, C. and Trompenaars, F. 1993. The Seven Cultures of Capitalism. London: Piatkus.
22. Hill, R.C. and Kim, J.W. 2000. Global cities and developmental states: New York, Tokyo and Seoul. Urban Studies, 37(12), 2167–95.
23. Hutton, W. 1995. The State We’re In. London: Cape.
24. Indergaard, M. 2011. Another Washington-New York consensus? Progressives back in contention. Environment and Planning A, 43(2), 286–306.
25. Johnson, C. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26. Kantor, P. 2002. Terrorism and governability in New York City: old problem, new dilemma. Urban Affairs Review, 38(1), 120–27.
27. Kantor, P. 2009. Globalisation and governance in the New York region: managed pluralism. Progress in Planning, 73(1), 34–8.
28. Kim, P.H. 2010. The East Asian welfare state debate and surrogate social policy: an exploratory study on Japan and South Korea. Socio-Economic Review, 8(3), 411–35.
29. Leaf, M. 2005. Modernity confronts tradition: the professional planner and local corporatism in the rebuilding of China's cities, in Comparative Planning Cultures, edited by B. Sanyal. New York and London: Routledge, 91–112.
30. Lefèvre, C. 2009. Gouverner les métropoles. Paris: Lextenso Editions.
31. Miyamoto, T. 2003. Dynamics of the Japanese welfare state in comparative perspective. The Japanese Journal of Social Security Policy, 2(2), 12–24.
32. Mollenkopf, J. 2008. School is out: the case of New York City. Urban Affairs Review, 44(2), 239–65.
33. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (NYCDHPD). 2003. The New Housing Market Place: Creating Housing for the Next Generation 2004–13. New York: City of New York.
34. Newman, P. and Thornley, A. 2011. Planning World Cities. 2nd Edition. London: Palgrave.
35. OECD. 1994. New Directions in Social Policy. Paris: OECD.
36. Powell, M. and Roberts, J. 2009. Minorities affected most as New York foreclosures rise. New York Times, 15 May. [Online]. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/16/nyregion/16foreclose.html [accessed 4 April 2013].
37. Présidence de la République. 2009. Le grand Paris. Dossier de presse. Cité de l’Architecture et patrimoine Paris, 29 April.
38. Ren, X. 2008. Architecture as branding: mega project development in Beijing. Built Environment, 34(4), 517–31.
39. SEMAVIP. 2009. SEMAVIP: For the City. Paris: Société d’économie mixte d’aménagement de la ville de Paris.
40. Sorensen, A. 2002. The Making of Urban Japan. London and New York: Routledge.
41. Subra, P. 2009. Le grand Paris. Paris: Armand Colin.
42. Thurow, L. 1992. Head to Head: The Coming Economic Battle among Japan, Europe and America. New York: William Morrow.
43. TMG. 2001. Tokyo Megalopolis Concept. Tokyo: TMG.
44. Zhao, P. 2010. Implementation of the metropolitan growth management in the transition era: evidence from Beijing. Planning Practice and Research, 25(1), 77–93.