Does vegetation impact on the population dynamics and male function in Anemone sylvestris L. (Ranunculaceae)? A case study in three natural populations of xerothermic grasslands

Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 197-205

  Denisow, Bozena ^a   Wrzesień, Małgorzata ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES IN LUBLIN   (Poland)

^b MARIA CURIE SK ODOWSKA UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Pollen mass; Pollen viability; Rare species; Seed set; Shrubs expansion

Indexed keywords

ANEMONE; BRACHYPODIUM PINNATUM; RANUNCULACEAE;

EID: 84936941319     PISSN: 00016977     EISSN: 20839480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5586/asbp.2015.017     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Krauss J, Klein AM, Dewenter IS, Tscharntke T. Effects of habitat area, isolation, and landscape diversity on plant species richness of calcareous grasslands. Biodivers Conserv. 2004;13:1427-1439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000021323.18165.58
2. Willis KJ, van Andel TH. Trees or no trees? The environments of central and eastern Europe during the Last Glaciation. Quat Sci Rev. 2004;23:2369-2387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev. 2004.06.002
3. Paul W. Migration routes of xerothermic plants into Poland-review of knowledge and hypothesis and research perspectives. In: Ratyńska H, Waldon B, editors. Thermophilous turfs of Poland. Bydgoszcz. Kazimierz Wielki University Press; 2010. p. 55-65.
4. Gömöry D, Dovèiak M, Gömöryová E, Hrivnák R, Janišová M, Ujházy K. Demecological, synecological and genetic aspects of the colonization of abandoned pastures and meadows by forest trees. Zvolen: Technical University in Zvolen, Slovakia; 2006.
5. Wallis de Vries MF, Poschlod P, Willems JH. Challenges for the conservation of calcareous grasslands in northwestern Europe: integrating the requirements of flora and fauna. Biol Conserv. 2002;104:265-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207 (01) 00191-4
6. Chilová T, Münzbergová Z. Past land use co-determines the present distribution of dry grassland plant species. Preslia. 2008;80:183-198.
7. Rysiak A. The share of xerothermic species in vascular flora of the city of Lublin (Poland). Acta Agrobot. 2012;65(2):133-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/aa.2012.067
8. Schlaepfer F. Influence of management on cover and seed production of Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) Beauv. in a calcareous grassland. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH. 1997;63:3-10.
9. Cremene C, Groza G, Rakosy L, Schileyko A, Baur A, Erhardt A, et al. Alterations of steppe-like grasslands in Eastern Europe: a threat to regional biodiversity hotspots. Conserv Biol. 2005;19:1606-1618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00084.x
10. Bornkamm R. Fifty years vegetation development of a xerothermic calcareous grassland in Central Europe after heavy disturbance. Flora. 2007;201:249-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2005.06.012
11. Hegedüšová K, Senko D. Successional changes of dry grasslands in southwestern Slovakia after 46 years of abandonment. Plant Biosyst. 2011;145(3):666-687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2011.6 01605
12. Czarnecka B. The dynamics of the population of a steppe perennial Senecio macrophyllus M. Bieb. during xerothermic grassland overgrowing. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2009;78(3):247-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/asbp. 2009.032
13. Dzwonko Z, Loster S. Dynamics of species richness and composition in a limestone grassland restored after tree cutting. J Veg Sci. 1998;9:387-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3237103
14. Dzwonko Z, Loster S. A functional analysis of vegetation dynamics in abandoned and restored limestone grasslands. J Veg Sci. 2007;18:203-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02531.x
15. Shirres DA, Bell AD. Rhizome growth and clone development in Anemone nemorosa L. Ann Bot. 1984;54:315-324.
16. Barrett JP, Silander JA. Seedling recruitment limitation in white clover (Trifolium repens, Leguminosae). Am J Bot. 1992;79:643-649. http://dx.doi.org/:10.2307/2444880
17. Eriksson O. Dynamics of genets in clonal plants. Trends Ecol Evol. 1993;8:313-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347 (93) 90237-J
18. Brunet J, van Oheimb G. Colonization of secondary woodlands by Anemone nemorosa. Nord J Bot. 1998;18:369-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1998.tb01892.x
19. Stehlik I, Holderegger R. Spatial genetic structure and clonal diversity of Anemone nemorosa in late successional deciduous woodlands of Central Europe. J Ecol. 2000;88:424-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00458.x
20. Denisow B. Pollen production of selected ruderal plant species in the Lublin area. Lublin: University Life Sci. Press; 2011. p. 15-18.
21. Lindell T. Breeding systems and crossing experiments in Anemone patens and in the Anemome pulsatilla group (Ranunculaceae). Nord J Bot. 1998;18(5):549-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1998. tb01535.x
22. Müller N, Schneller JJ, Holderegger R. Variation in breeding system among populations of the common woodland herb Anemone nemorosa (Ranunculaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 2000;221(1-2):69-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01086381
23. Erbar C, Leins P. Nectar production in the pollen flower of Anemone nemorosa in comparison with other Ranunculaceae and Magnolia (Magnoliaceae). Org Divers Evol. 2013;13:287-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13127-013-0131-9
24. Denisow B, Bozek M. Blooming biology and pollen production in Anemone japonica Houtt. = Anemone ×hybrida hort. Acta Agrobot. 2006;59(1):139-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/aa.2006.014
25. Pacini E. From anther and pollen ripening to pollen presentation. Plant Syst Evol. 2000;222:19-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00984094
26. Dafni A, Firmago D. Pollen viability and longevity: practical, ecological and evolutionary implications. Plant Syst Evol. 2000;222:113-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00984098
27. Kunin WE. Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. J Ecol. 1997;85:225-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2960653
28. Knight T. Floral density, pollen limitation, and reproductive success in Trillium grandiflorum. Oecologia. 2003;442:557-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1371-8
29. Parachnowitsch AL, Elle E. Variation in sex allocation and male-female trade-offs in six populations of Collinsia parviflora (Scrophulariaceae s.l.). Am J Bot. 2004;91(8):1200-1207. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.8.1200
30. Morgan MT, Wilson WG, Knight TM. Plant population dynamics, pollinator foraging, and the selection of self-fertilization. Am Nat. 2005;166:169-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/431317
31. Aizen MA, Harder LD. Expanding the limits of the pollen limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology. 2007;99:271-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/06-1017
32. Franzén M, Larsson M. Seed set differs in relation to pollen and nectar foraging flower visitors in an insect-pollinated herb. Nord J Bot. 2009;27(4):274-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2009.00348.x
33. Gómez JM, Abdelaziz M, Lorite J, Muńoz-Pajares AJ, Perfectti F. Changes in pollinator fauna cause spatial variation in pollen limitation. J Ecol. 2010;98:1243-1252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01691.x
34. Ibanez S. Optimizing size thresholds in a plant-pollinator interaction web: towards a mechanistic understanding of ecological networks. Oecologia. 2012;170(1):233-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2290-3
35. Cruden RW. Pollen grains: why so many? Plant Syst Evol. 2000;222:143-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00984100
36. Manning JC. Diversity of endothecial patterns in the angiosperms. In: D'Arcy, WG, Keating RC, editors. The anther. Form, function and phylogeny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. p. 136-158.
37. Campbell DR. Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000;15:227-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347 (00) 01872-3
38. Larson BMH, Barrett CHB. A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2000;69:503-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1999.0372
39. Barrett SCH, Eckert CG. Current issues in plant reproductive ecology. Israel Journal of Botany. 1990;39:5-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00 21213X.1990.10677130
40. Douglas KL, Cruden RW. The reproductive biology of Anemone canadensis (Ranunculaceae): breeding system and facilitation of sexual selection. Am J Bot. 1994;81:314-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2445458
41. Vange V. Breeding system and inbreeding depression in the clonal plant species Knautia arvensis (Dipsacaceae): implications for survival in abandoned grassland. Biol Conserv. 2002;108(1):59-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207 (02) 00090-3
42. Ashman TL, Knight TM, Steets J, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, et al. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology. 2004;85:2408-2421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/03-8024
43. Denisow B, Wrzesień M. The study of blooming and pollen efficiency of Adonis vernalis L. in xerothermic plant communities. J Apic Sci. 2006;50(1):25-32.
44. Czarnecka B, Denisow B. Floral biology of Senecio macrophyllus M. BIEB. (Asteraceae), a rare Central European steppe plant. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2014;83(1):17-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/asbp. 2014.002
45. Denisow B, Wrzesień M, Cwener A. The estimation of Adonis vernalis L. populations in chosen patches of Lublin Upland. Acta Agrobot. 2008;61(1):3-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/aa.2008.001
46. Denisow B, Wrzesień M, Cwener A. Pollination and floral biology of Adonis vernalis L. (Ranunculaceae) - a case study of threatened species. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2014;83(1):29-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/asbp. 2014.001
47. Klotz S, Kühn I, Durka W, editors. BiolFlor Eine Datenbank zu biologischökologischen. Merkmalen der Gefäßpflanzen in Deutschland. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde, 38. Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz; 2002.
48. Ehrendorfer F, Ziman AN, König C, Keener CS, Dutton BE, Tsarenko ON, et al. Taxonomic revision, phylogenetics and transcontinental distribution of Anemone section Anemone (Ranunculaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 2009;160:312-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00861.x
49. Zając M, Zając A. Elementy geograficzne rodzimej flory Polski. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński; 2009.
50. Kwiatkowska-Falińska JA, Faliński JB. Conditions of occurrence of Anemone sylvestris in a kettle hole in north-eastern Poland. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2007;76(2):133-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/asbp. 2007.017
51. van der Maarel E. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio. 1979;29:97-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00052021
52. Matuszkiewicz W. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk ros̈linnych Polski. Warszawa. Polish Scientific Publishers PWN; 2006.
53. Mirek Z, Piekos̈-Mirkowa H, Zając A, Zając M. Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland a checklist. In: Mirek Z, editor. Biodiversity of Poland. Cracow: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2002. (vol 1).
54. Denisow B. Pollen production, flowering and insect visits on Euphorbia cyparissias L. and Euphorbia virgultosa Klok. J Apic Res. 2009;48(1):50-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.48.1.11
55. Climate data: Poland-Włodawa, Zamos̈ć, Radawiec [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Mar. 18]; Available from: http://en. tutiempo.net/climate
56. Kovach WL. MVSP A Multivariate Statistical package for Windows ver.3.1. Wales: Kovach Computing Services, Pentraeth; 2007.
57. ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P. CANOCO reference manual and Canodraw for Windows. User's guide: Software for ordination (ver. 5.0). Wageningen: Biometric; 2012.
58. Stanisz A. Przystępny kurs statystyki z zastosowaniem Statistica na przykładach z medycyny. Kraków; Statsoft Polska; 2007.
59. Grzyl A, Kiedrzyński M, Zielińka KM, Rewicz A. The relationship between climatic conditions and generative reproduction of a lowland population of Pulsatilla vernalis: the last breath of a relict plant or a fluctuating cycle of regeneration? Plant Ecol. 2014;215:457-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0316-0
60. Barbaro L, Dutoit T, Cozic P. A six-year experimental restoration of biodiversity by shrub-clearing and grazing in calcareous grasslands of the French Prealps. Biodivers Conserv. 2001;10:119-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016629507196
61. Trąba C, Wolański P, Oklejewicz K. Communities with Brachypodium pinnatum and Bromus erectus in the Wiar and the San Valley. Ann UMCS Biol. 2012;67(1):69-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/V10067-012-0014-Z
62. Virágh K, Bartha S. Species turnover as a function of vegetation pattern. Tiscia. 2003;34:47-56.
63. Jacquemyn H, Butaye J, Hermy M. Impacts of restored patch density and distance from natural forests on colonization success. Restor Ecol. 2003;11(4):417-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003. rec0237.x
64. Prasad V, Djanaguiraman M. High night temperature decreases leaf photosynthesis and pollen function in grain sorghum. Funct Plant Biol. 2011;38(12):993-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/FP11035
65. Campbell DR, Halama KJ. Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology. 1993;74:1043-1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1940474
66. Kalla SE, Ashman TL. The effects of pollen competition on progeny vigor in Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae) depend on progeny growth environment. Int J Plant Sci. 2002;163(2):335-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/338395
67. Bullock JM, Clear Hill B, Dale MP, Silvertown J. An experimental study of the effects of sheep grazing on vegetation change in a species-poor grassland and the role of seedling recruitment into gaps. J Appl Ecol. 1994;31:493-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2404445
68. Corcket E, Liancourt P, Callaway RM, Michalet R. The relative importance of competition for two dominant grass species, as affected by environmental manipulations in the field. Ecoscience. 2003;10(2):186-194.
69. Reader RJ, Bonser SP. Control of plant frequency on an environmental gradient: effects of abiotic variables, neighbours, and predators on Poa pratensis and Poa compressa (Gramineae). Can J Bot. 1993;71(4):592-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b93-067
70. Muchhala N, Thomson JD. Fur versus feathers: pollen delivery by bats and hummingbirds and consequences for pollen production. Am Nat. 2010;175:717-726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/652473
71. Goulson D. Foraging strategies of insects for gathering nectar and pollen, and implications for plant ecology and evolution. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 1999;2:185-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/1433-8319-00070
72. Kundzewicz ZW, Radziejewski M, Pińskwar J. Principation extremes in the changing climate of Europe. Clim Res. 2006;31:51-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr031051