Discretion in Student Discipline: Insight Into Elementary Principals’ Decision Making

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 472-507

  Findlay, Nora M ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

discretion; educational leadership; principals decision making; student discipline; values

Indexed keywords

EID: 84936863233     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: 15523519     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X14523617     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. C.M.T.Ackerman (2003). Zero-tolerance: Development of an instrument to measure how zero-tolerance is defined and implemented in schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, State College. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3200203)
2. C.R.AshbaughK.L.Kasten (1984). A typology of operant values in school administration. Planning and Changing, 15(4), 195-208.
3. S.Baldridge (1995). Models for school board policy development: Rationalism, empiricism and the new science. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 1995(1), 43-61. Retrieved from http://www.heinonline.org
4. M.H.Bazerman (2006). Judgment in managerial decision making (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
5. P.T.Begley (2003). In pursuit of authentic school leadership practices. In P.T.BegleyO.Johansson (Eds.), The ethical dimensions of school leadership (pp. 1-12). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
6. P.T.Begley (2010). Leading with moral purpose: The place of ethics. In T.BushL.BellD.Middlewood (Eds.), The principles of educational leadership and management (2nd ed., pp. 31-54). London, UK: Sage.
7. A.F.BrownM.A.Zuker (2007). Education law (4th ed.). Toronto, Canada: Carswell.
8. G.H.Campbell-Evans (1988). Nature and influence of values in principal decision-making (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
9. M.CheslerJ.CrowfootB.I.BryantJr. (1979). Organizational context of school discipline: Analytic models and policy options. Education and Urban Society, 11(4), 495-510. doi:10.1177/001312457901100403
10. F.L.Clark (2002). Zero-tolerance discipline: The effect of teacher discretionary removal on urban minority students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3099435)
11. R.L.CrowsonC.Porter-Gehrie (1980). The discretionary behavior of principals in large-city schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(1), 45–69. doi:10.1177/0013161X8001600106
12. K.C.Davis (1969). Discretionary justice: A preliminary inquiry. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
13. S.H.Davis (2004). The myth of the rational decision maker: A framework for applying and enhancing heuristic and intuitive decision-making by school leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 14(6), 621-652.
14. The Education Act, S.S. 1995, c. E-0.2 (1995).
15. N.M.Findlay (2012a). At law’s end: In-school administrators’ exercise of discretion in disciplinary decision making. In M.E.Manley-CasimirA.D.Moffat (Eds.), Administrative discretion in education (pp. 15-47). Calgary, Canada: Brush Education.
16. N.M.Findlay (2012b). The problem of the penumbra: Elementary school principals’ exercise of discretion in student disciplinary issues (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Western University, London, ON, Canada. Posted at Scholarship@Western. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/689
17. W.C.Frick (2009). Principals’ value-informed decision-making, intrapersonal moral discord, and pathways to resolution: The complexities of moral leadership praxis. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1), 50-74. doi:10.1108/09578230910928089
18. D.J.Galligan (1986). Discretionary powers: A legal study of official discretion. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
19. B.A.Garner (Ed.). (2009). Black’s law dictionary (9th ed.). St. Paul, MN: Thomson Reuters.
20. P.B.Gove (Ed.). (1976). Webster’s third new international dictionary of the English language unabridged. Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam.
21. T.Greenfield (1993). Re-forming and re-valuing educational administration: Whence and when cometh the phoenix? In T.GreenfieldP.Ribbins (Eds.), Greenfield on educational administration (pp. 169-198). London, UK: Routledge.
22. W.D.GreenfieldJr. (1995). Toward a theory of school administration: The centrality of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 61-85. doi:10.1177/0013161X95031001005
23. W.D.GreenfieldJr. (2004). Moral leadership in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(2), 174-196. doi:10.1108/09578230410525595
24. P.C.Gronn (2003). The new work of educational leaders: Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. London, UK: Paul Chapman.
25. M.T.Hall (1999). Administrative discretion and youth violence in schools: An analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
26. J.F.Handler (1986). The conditions of discretion: Autonomy, community, bureaucracy. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
27. H.L.A.Hart (1961). The concept of law. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
28. H.L.A.Hart (1982). Essays on Bentham: Studies in jurisprudence and political theory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
29. H.L.A.Hart (1983). Essays in jurisprudence and philosophy. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
30. H.L.A.Hart (1994). The concept of law (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
31. K.Hawkins (1992). The use of legal discretion: Perspectives from law and social science. In K.O.Hawkins (Ed.), The uses of discretion (pp. 11-46). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
32. K.Hawkins (1997). Law and discretion: Exploring collective aspects of administrative decision-making. Education and Law Journal, 8(2), 139-160.
33. K.Hawkins (1998). Law and discretion: A beast to tame?Education & Law Journal. 8(3), 407–420.
34. K.Hawkins (2003). Order, rationality and silence: Some reflections on criminal justice decision-making. In L.GelsthorpeN.Padfield (Eds.), Exercising discretion: Decision-making in the criminal justice system and beyond (pp. 186–219). Portland, OR: Willan.
35. M.Heilmann (2006). Principals’ perspectives on discretion and decision-making (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
36. C.Hodgkinson (1978). Towards a philosophy of administration. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
37. C.Hodgkinson (1991). Educational leadership: The moral art. Albany: State University of New York Press.
38. C.Hodgkinson (1996). Administrative philosophy: Values and motivations in administrative life. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
39. B.Hutchinson (2007). Evolution of the careful and prudent parent standard and student responsibility. In R.C.Flynn (Ed.), Students at the centre (pp. 155-173). Toronto, Canada: CAPSLE.
40. D.P.JonesA.S.de Villars (2004). Principles of administrative law (4th ed.) Scarborough, Canada: Thomson Canada.
41. N.Lacey (1992). The jurisprudence of discretion: Escaping the legal paradigm. In K.O.Hawkins (Ed.), The uses of discretion (pp. 361-388). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
42. L.LaRocqueP.Coleman (1985). The elusive link: School-level responses to school board policies. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 31, 149-167.
43. M.Lipsky (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
44. H.S.LuflerJr. (1979). Debating with untested assumptions: The needs to understand school discipline. Education and Urban Society, 11(4), 450-464. doi:10.1177/00131245790110040
45. F.C.LunenburgA.C.Ornstein (2008). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.
46. A.W.MacKay (2008). Safe and inclusive schooling—expensive.. quality education—priceless. For everything else there are lawyers!Education and Law Journal, 18(1), 21-55.
47. A.W.MacKayL.Sutherland (2006). Teachers and the law (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Emond Montgomery.
48. A.L.Manasse (1985). Improving conditions for principal effectiveness: Policy implications of research. Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 349-463.
49. M.E.Manley-Casimir (1971). Student discipline as discretionary justice. Administrator’s Notebook, 20(2), n.p.
50. M.E.Manley-Casimir (1974). The law: Catalyst for educational reform?School Review, 82(2), 155-157. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org
51. M.E.Manley-Casimir (1977-1978). Discretion in school discipline. Interchange, 8(1-2), 84-100.
52. M.R.Manley-Casimir (2012). Discretion, conscience and practical wisdom: The calculus of administrative life. In M.E.Manley-CasimirA.D.Moffat (Eds.), Administrative discretion in education (pp. 256-262). Calgary, Canada: Brush Education.
53. N.T.MertzS.R.McNeely (1998). Women on the job: A study of female high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 196-222.
54. M.J.MeyerR.B.MacmillanS.K.Northfield (2009). The use of conscience and discretion as constructs in principals’ difficult or conflicted decision-making dealings during principal succession events. International Studies in Educational Administration, 37(3), 20-36.
55. V.C.MorrisR.L.CrowsonE.HurwitzJr.C.Porter-Gehrie (1984). Principals in action: The reality of managing schools. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
56. Myers v. Peel County Board of Education, [1981] 2 S.C.R. 21 (1981).
57. J.PaquetteD.Allison (1997). Decision-making and discretion: The agony and ecstasy of law and administration. Education and Law Journal, 8(2), 161-181.
58. R.Pound (1960). Discretion, dispensation and mitigation: The problem of the individual special case. New York University Law Review, 35, 925-937. Retrieved from http://www.heinonline.org
59. R. v. A.M., [2008] 1 S.C.R. 569, 2008 SCC 19 (2008).
60. R. v. M.R.M., [1998] 3 S.C.R. 393 (1998).
61. J.V.RobertsN.Bala (2003). Understanding sentencing under the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Alberta Law Review, 41(2), 395-423. Retrieved from http://www.heinonline.org
62. K.Roche (1999). Moral and ethical dilemmas in Catholic school settings. In P.T.Begley (Ed.), Values and educational leadership (pp. 255-272). Albany: State University of New York Press.
63. E.M.Roher (2007). Will the new safe schools legislation make Ontario schools safer?Education and Law Journal, 17(2), 201-221.
64. E.M.RoherS.A.Wormwell (2000). An educator’s guide to the role of the principal. Aurora, Canada: Aurora Professional Press.
65. J.M.Ross (1991). Applying the Charter to discretionary authority. Alberta Law Review, 29(2), 382-419.
66. L.F.Rossow (1984). Administrative discretion and student suspension: A lion in waiting. Journal of Law and Education, 13(3), 417-440. Retrieved from http://www.heinonline.org
67. C.E.Schneider (1992). Discretion and rules: A lawyer’s view. In K.O.Hawkins (Ed.), The uses of discretion (pp. 47-88). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
68. D.H.ShumavonH.K.Hibbeln (1986). Administrative discretion: Problems and prospects. In D.H.ShumavonH.K.Hibbeln (Eds.), Administrative discretion and public policy implementation (pp. 1-13). New York, NY: Praeger.
69. L.Sossin (2002). An intimate approach to fairness, impartiality and reasonableness in administrative law. Queen’s Law Journal, 27(2), 809-858.
70. J.A.Stefkovich (2006). Best interests of the student: Applying ethical constraints to legal cases in education. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
71. S.E.Stelck (2007). Walking the tightrope: The influence of law in balancing competing interests in education. In R.C.Flynn (Ed.), Students at the centre (pp. 333-346). Toronto, Canada: CAPSLE.
72. M.S.TorresJr.Y.Chen (2006). Assessing Columbine’s impact on students’ Fourth Amendment case outcomes: Implications for administrative discretion and decision-making. NASSP Bulletin, 90(3), 185-206. doi:10.1177/0192636506292070
73. J.Vorenburg (1976). Narrowing the discretion of criminal justice officials. Duke Law Journal, 4, 651-609. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org
74. D.Yankelovich (1994). How changes in the economy are reshaping American values. In H.J.AaronT.E.MannT.Taylor, (Eds.), Values and public policy (pp. 16-53). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
75. Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C., 2002, c. 1 (2002).
76. M.A.ZukerR.C.HammondR.C.Flynn (2009). Children’s law handbook (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Carswell.