Reliability of manikin-based studies: An evaluation of manikin characteristics and their impact on measurements of ventilatory variables

Anaesthesia

Volumn 70, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 915-921

  De Luca, A ^a   Sall, F S ^a   Sailley, R ^a   Capellier, G ^a   Khoury, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSISTED VENTILATION; CPR MANIKIN; LUNG SIMULATOR; MECHANICAL VENTILATOR; SIMULATOR; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREATHING; LUNG; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TIDAL VOLUME;

LUNG; MANIKINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESPIRATION; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 84936846161     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.13099     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Finan E, Bismilla Z, Campbell C, Leblanc V, Jefferies A, Whyte HE,. Improved procedural performance following a simuation training session may not be transferable to the clinical environment. Journal of Perinatology 2012; 32: 539-44.
2. Crabtree NA, Chandra DB, Weiss ID, Joo HS, Naik VN,. Fibreoptic airway training: correlation of simulator performance and clinical skill. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2008; 55: 100-4.
3. Chandra DB, Savoldelli GL, Joo HS, Naik VN,. Fiberoptic oral intubation: the effect of model fidelity on training for transfer to patient care. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 1007-13.
4. Good ML,. Patient simulation for training basic and advanced clinical skills. Medical Education 2003; 37 (Suppl. 1): 14-21.
5. Rai MR, Popat MT,. Evaluation of airway equipment: man or manikin? Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 1-3.
6. Cook TM,. Novel airway devices: spoilt for choice? Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 107-10.
7. Siu LW, Boet S, Borges BC, et al., High-fidelity simulation demonstrates the influence of anesthesiologists' age and years from residency on emergency cricothyroidotomy skills. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2010; 111: 955-60.
8. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Giampalmo M, et al., Airway management during spaceflight: a comparison of four airway devices in simulated microgravity. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 1237-41.
9. Koster RW, Baubin MA, Bossaert LL, et al., European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 1277-92.
10. Wenzel V, Idris AH, Banner MJ, Kubilis PS, Williams JL Jr,. Influence of tidal volume on the distribution of gas between the lungs and stomach in the nonintubated patient receiving positive-pressure ventilation. Critical Care Medicine 1998; 26: 364-8.
11. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ,. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher 2005; 27: 10-28.
12. Schebesta K, Hüpfl M, Rössler B, Ringl H, Müller MP, Kimberger O,. Degrees of reality: airway anatomy of high-fidelity human patient simulators and airway trainers. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 1204-9.
13. Hesselfeldt R, Kristensen MS, Rasmussen LS,. Evaluation of the airway of the SimMan full-scale patient simulator. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2005; 49: 1339-45.
14. Jordan GM, Silsby J, Bayley G, Cook TM,. Difficult Airway Society. Evaluation of four manikins as simulators for teaching airway management procedures specified in the Difficult Airway Society guidelines, and other advanced airway skills. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 708-12.
15. Silsby J, Jordan G, Bayley G, Cook TM,. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as simulators for inserting the LMA Classic. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 576-9.
16. Jackson KM, Cook TM,. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of eight types of supraglottic airway devices. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 388-93.
17. Cook TM, Green C, McGrath J, Srivastava R,. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of single use laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 713-8.
18. Marchese AD, Sulemanji D, Chipman D, Villar J, Kacmarek RM,. Performance of current intensive care unit ventilators during pressure and volume ventilation. Respiratory Care 2011; 56: 928-40.
19. Lyazidi A, Thille AW, Carteaux G, Galia F, Brochard L, Richard JC,. Bench test evaluation of volume delivered by modern ICU ventilators during volume-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Medicine 2010; 36: 2074-80.
20. Wagner-Berger HG, Wenzel V, Stallinger A, et al., Optimizing bag-valve-mask ventilation with a new mouth-to-bag resuscitator. Resuscitation 2003; 56: 191-8.
21. Zecha-Stallinger A, Wenzel V, Wagner-Berger HG, von Goedecke A, Lindner KH, Hörmann C,. A strategy to optimise the performance of the mouth-to-bag resuscitator using small tidal volumes: effects on lung and gastric ventilation in a bench model of an unprotected airway. Resuscitation 2004; 61: 69-74.
22. Barnes TA, Catino ME, Burns EC, et al., Comparison of an oxygen-powered flow-limited resuscitator to manual ventilation with an adult 1000-mL self-inflating bag. Respiratory Care 2005; 50: 1445-50.
23. Dietrich P, Graetz KW, Mutzbauer TS,. Evaluation of pressure-controlled ventilation concepts during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in dental chairs. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2013; 17: 173-9.
24. Marjanovic N, Le Floch S, Jaffrelot M, L'Her E,. Evaluation of manual and automatic manually triggered ventilation performance and ergonomics using a simulation model. Respiratory Care 2014; 59: 735-42.
25. Bergrath S, Rossaint R, Biermann H, et al., Comparison of manually triggered ventilation and bag-valve-mask ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a manikin model. Resuscitation 2012; 83: 488-93.
26. Stallinger A, Wenzel V, Wagner-Berger H, et al., Effects of decreasing inspiratory flow rate during simulated basic life support ventilation of a cardiac arrest patient on lung and stomach tidal volumes. Resuscitation 2002; 54: 167-73.