Neural correlates of valence generalization in an affective conditioning paradigm

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 292, Issue , 2015, Pages 147-156

  Schick, Anita ^a   Adam, Ruth ^b,c   Vollmayr, Barbara ^d   Kuehner, Christine ^d   Kanske, Philipp ^e   Wessa, Michèle ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MAINZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (Germany)

^e MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^f JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory discrimination; Cognitive bias; FMRI; Salience; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; AMBIGUITY; ANTERIOR INSULA; ANXIETY; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; BOLD SIGNAL; COGNITIVE BIAS; CONDITIONING; CONFUSION (UNCERTAINTY); CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; RUMINATION; SALIENCE NETWORK; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TRAIT ANXIETY; VALENCE GENERALIZATION; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; REWARD; STATISTICAL BIAS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CEREBRAL CORTEX; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CUES; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; REWARD;

EID: 84936803145     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Lissek S. Toward an account of clinical anxiety predicated on basic, neurally mapped mechanisms of Pavlovian fear-learning: the case for conditioned overgeneralization. Depress Anxiety 2012, 29:257-263.
2. Lissek S., Rabin S., Heller R.E., Lukenbaugh D., Geraci M., Pine D.S., Grillon C. Overgeneralization of conditioned fear as a pathogenic marker of panic disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 2010, 167:47-55.
3. Dunsmoor J.E., Prince E., Murty V.P., Kragel P.A., LaBar K. Neurobehavioral mechanisms of human fear generalization. NeuroImage 2011, 55:1878-1888.
4. Lissek S., Bradford D.E., Alvarez R.P., Burton P., Espensen-Sturges T., Reynolds R.C., Grillon C. Neural substrates of classically conditioned fear-generalization in humans: a parametric fMRI study. SCAN 2014, 9:1134-1142.
5. Greenberg T., Carlson J.M., Cha J., Hajcak G., Mujica-Parodi L.R. Neural reactivity tracks fear generalization gradients. Biol Psychol. 2013, 92:2-8.
6. Greenberg T., Carlson J.M., Cha J., Hajcak G., Mujica-Parodi L.R. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex reactivity is altered in generalized anxiety disorder during fear generalization. Depress Anxiety 2013, 30:242-250.
7. Gotlib I.H., Joormann J. Cognition and depression: current status and future directions. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2010, 6:285-312.
8. Mathews A., MacLeod C. Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2005, 1:167-195.
9. Butler G., Mathews A. Cognitive-processes in anxiety. Adv. Behav. Res. Ther. 1983, 5:51-62.
10. Eysenck M.W., Mogg K., May J., Richards A., Mathews A. Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 1991, 100:144-150.
11. Krantz S., Hammen C. Assessment of cognitive bias in depression. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 1979, 88:611-619.
12. Wisco B.E., Nolen-Hoeksema S. Interpretation bias and depressive symptoms: the role of self-relevance. Behav. Res. Ther. 2010, 48:1113-1122.
13. Berna C., Lang T.J., Goodwin G.M., Holmes E.A. Developing a measure of interpretation bias for depressed mood: an ambiguous scenarios test. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 2011, 51:349-354.
14. Lang T.J., Blackwell S.E., Harmer C.J., Davison P., Holmes E.A. Cognitive Bias Modification Using Mental Imagery for Depression: Developing a Novel Computerized Intervention to Change Negative Thinking Styles. Eur. J. Pers. 2012, 26:145-157.
15. Mogg K., Bradbury K.E., Bradley B.P. Interpretation of ambiguous information in clinical depression. Behav. Res. Ther. 2006, 44:1411-1419.
16. Harding E.J., Paul E.S., Mendl M. Animal behaviour: cognitive bias and affective state. Nature 2004, 427:312.
17. Enkel T., Gholizadeh D., von Bohlen und Halbach O., Sanchis-Segura C., Hurlemann R., Spanagel R., Gass P., Vollmayr B. Ambiguous-cue interpretation is biased under stress- and depression-like states in rats. Neuropsychopharmacol. Off. Publ. Am. Coll. 2010, 35:1008-1015.
18. Schick A., Wessa M., Vollmayr B., Kuehner C., Kanske P. Indirect assessment of an interpretation bias in humans: neurophysiological and behavioral correlates. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:272.
19. Burman O.H.P., Parker R., Paul E.S., Mendl M. A spatial judgement task to determine background emotional state in laboratory rats, Rattus norvegicus. Anim. Behav. 2008, 76:801-809.
20. Mendl M., Brooks J., Basse C., Burman O., Paul E., Blackwell E., Casey R. Dogs showing separation-related behaviour exhibit a 'pessimistic' cognitive bias. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:R839-40.
21. Brilot B.O., Asher L., Bateson M. Stereotyping starlings are more 'pessimistic'. Anim. Cogn. 2010, 13:721-731.
22. Anderson M.H., Hardcastle C., Munafo M.R., Robinson E.S. Evaluation of a novel translational task for assessing emotional biases in different species. Cogn. Affective Behav. Neurosci. 2012, 12:373-381.
23. Haber S.N., Knutson B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacol. Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010, 35:4-26.
24. Hsu M., Bhatt M., Adolphs R., Tranel D., Camerer C.F. Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science 2005, 310:1680-1683.
25. Huettel S.A., Stowe C.J., Gordon E.M., Warner B.T., Platt M.L. Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity. Neuron 2006, 49:765-775.
26. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
27. Bradley M.M., Lang P.J. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 1994, 25(1):49-59.
28. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Social Psychol. 1988, 54:1063-1070.
29. Huffziger S., Kühner C. The rumination components broading and reflection. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the German version RSQ-10D. Z Kl Psych Psychoth 2012, 41:38-46.
30. Treynor W., Gonzalez R., Nolen-Hoeksema S. Rumination reconsidered: a psychometric analysis. Cogn. Ther. Res. 2003, 27:247-259.
31. Spielberger C.D. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 1983, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto.
32. Evans A.C., Marrett S., Neelin P., Collins L., Worsley K., Dai W., Milot S., Meyer E., Bub D. Anatomical mapping of functional activation in stereotactic coordinate space. NeuroImage 1992, 1:43-53.
33. Friston K.J., Zarahn E., Josephs O., Henson R.N., Dale A.M. Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. NeuroImage 1999, 10:607-619.
34. Bush G., Luu Posner Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:215-222.
35. Bush G., Vogt B.A., Holmes J., Dale A.M., Greve D., Jenike M.A., Rosen B.R. Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: a role in reward-based decision making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:523-528.
36. Knutson B., Fong G.W., Adams C.M., Varner J.L., Hommer D. Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI. Neuroreport 2001, 12:3683-3687.
37. Craig A.D. How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:655-666.
38. Craig A.D. How do you feel - now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:59-70.
39. Duerden E.G., Arsalidou M., Lee M., Taylor M.J. Lateralization of affective processing in the insula. NeuroImage 2013, 78:159-175.
40. Rushworth M.F., Hadland K.A., Paus T., Sipila P.K. Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: a combined fMRI and TMS study. J. Neurophysiol. 2002, 87:2577-2592.
41. Menon V., Uddin L.Q. Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Struct. Funct. 2010, 214:655-667.
42. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 2004, 306:443-447.
43. Lau H., Rogers R.D., Passingham R.E. Dissociating response selection and conflict in the medial frontal surface. NeuroImage 2006, 29:446-451.
44. Van Veen V., Carter C.S. The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiol. Behav. 2002, 77:477-482.
45. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D., Carter C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:539-546.
46. Krain A.L., Wilson A.M., Arbuckle R., Castellanos F.X., Milham M.P. Distinct neural mechanisms of risk and ambiguity: a meta-analysis of decision-making. NeuroImage 2006, 32:477-484.
47. Neta M., Kelley W.M., Whalen P.J. Neural responses to ambiguity involve domain-general and domain-specific emotion processing systems. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2013, 25:547-557.
48. Thielscher A., Pessoa L. Neural correlates of perceptual choice and decision making during fear-disgust discrimination. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2007, 27:2908-2917.