Meso level influences on long term condition self-management: Stakeholder accounts of commonalities and differences across six European countries Health policies, systems and management in high-income countries

BMC Public Health

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Rogers, Anne ^a   Vassilev, Ivaylo ^a   Pumar, Maria J Jesús ^b   Todorova, Elka ^c,d   Portillo, Mari Carmen ^b   Foss, Christina ^e   Koetsenruijter, Jan ^f   Ratsika, Nikoleta ^g   Serrano, Manuel ^h   Knutsen, Ingrid A Ruud ^e   Wensing, Michel ^f   Roukova, Poli ^c,d   Patelarou, Evridiki ^g   Kennedy, Anne ^a   Lionis, Christos ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NATIONAL AND WORLD ECONOMY   (Bulgaria)

^d BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Bulgaria)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^f RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

^h Funducaion Educacion Salud y Sociedad   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cross national comparison; Diabetes Type 2; Long term conditions; Macro; Meso level influences; Self management support; State capacity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; EUROPE; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MOTIVATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF CARE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; EUROPE; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MOTIVATION; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SELF CARE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 84936744929     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1957-1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Escolar-Pujolar A, Bacigalupe A, San SM. European economic crisis and health inequities: research challenges in an uncertain scenario. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13:59.
2. Grintsova O, Maier W, Mielck A. Inequalities in health care among patients with type 2 diabetes by individual socio-economic status (SES) and regional deprivation: a systematic literature review. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13:43.
3. Vassilev I, Rogers A, Sanders C, Cheraghi- Sohi S, Blickem C, Brooks H, et al. Social status and living with a chronic illness: an exploration of assessment and meaning attributed to work and employment. Chronic Illn. 2014;10(4):273-90.
4. Rise MB, Pellerud A, Rygg LO, Steinsbekk A. Making and maintaining lifestyle changes after participating in group based type 2 diabetes self-management educations: a qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e64009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064009.
5. Glazier RH, Bajcar J, Kennie NR, Willson K. A systematic review of interventions to improve diabetes care in socially disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(7):1675-88.
6. Kousoulis AA, Patelarou E, Shea S, Foss C, Ruud Knutsen IA, Todorova E, et al. Diabetes self-management arrangements in Europe: a realist review to facilitate a project implemented in six countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:453.
7. Stuckler D, McKee M, Ebrahim S, Basu S. Manufacturing epidemics: the role of global producers in increased consumption of unhealthy commodities including processed foods, alcohol, and tobacco. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001235.
8. Macknbach JP, Karanikolos M, McKee M. The unequal health of Europeans: successes and failures of policies. Lancet. 2013;381:1125-34.
9. Vassilev I, Rogers A, Blickem C, Brooks H, Kapadia D, Kennedy A, et al. Social networks, and the 'work' and work force of chronic illness self-management: A survey analysis of personal communities. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e59723.
10. Rogers A, Vassilev I, Kennedy A, Blickem C, Reeves D, Brooks H. Why less may be more?: A mixed methods study of the work and relatedness of 'weak' ties in supporting long term condition self- management. Implement Sci. 2014;9:19.
11. Reeves D, Blickem C, Vassilev I, Brooks H, Kennedy A, Richardson G, et al. The Contribution of Social Networks to the Health and Self-Management of Patients with Long-Term Conditions: A Longitudinal Study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e98340.
12. Bajekal M, Scholes S, Love H, Hawkins N, O'Flaherty M, Raine R, et al. Analysing Recent Socioeconomic Trends in Coronary Heart Disease Mortality in England, 2000-2007: A Population Modelling Study. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001237.
13. Kennedy A, Bower P, Rogers A. Support for self care for patients with chronic disease. BMJ. 2007;335:968.
14. Rogers A, Bury M, Kennedy A. Rationality, rhetoric and religiosity in health care: the case of England's Expert Patients Programme. Int J Health Serv. 2009;39:725-47.
15. Bower P, Blakeman T, Kennedy A, Protheroe J, Richardson G, Rogers A, et al. What influences people to self care? NPCRDC, The University of Manchester 2007, http://www.population-health.manchester.ac.uk/primarycare/npcrdc-archive/Publications/WHAT-INFLUENCES-PEOPLE-TO-SELF-CARE-MARCH-2009.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2015.
16. Silverman D. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. London: Sage; 1997.
17. Doran T, Kontopantelis E, Valderas J, Campbell S, Roland M, Salisbury C, et al. Effect of financial incentives on incentivized and non-incentivized clinical activities. Evidence from the UK's Quality and Outcomes Framework. Br Med J. 2011;342:doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3590.
18. Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Shaw S. The organising vision for telehealth and telecare:discourse analaysis. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001574. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001574.
19. Knai C, Nolte E, Brunn M, Elissen A, Conklin A, Pedersen JP, et al. Reported barriers to evaluation in chronic care: experiences in six European countries. Health Policy. 2013;110:220-8.
20. Offe C, Lenhardt G. Social policy and the theory of the State. In: Keane J, editor. Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson; 1984.
21. Pilgrim D. The British welfare state and mental health problems: the continuing relevance of the work of Claus Offe. Sociol Health Illness. 2013;34(7):1070-84.
22. Lionis C, Symvoulakis E, Markaki A, Vardavas C, Papadakaki M, Daniilidou N, et al. Integrated primary health care in Greece, a missing issue in the current health policy agenda: a systematic review. Int J Integr Care. 2009;9:e88.
23. European Commission. Patient involvement: aggregate report. Eurobarometer qualitative study. 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/public-opinion/archives/quali/ql-5937-patient-en.pdf Accessed 7 May 2015.
24. Koetsenruijter J, van Lieshout J, Vassilev I, Portillo MC, Serrano M, Knutsen I, et al. Social support systems as determinants of self-management and quality of life of people with diabetes across Europe: study protocol for an observational study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:29.