Contrasting growth phenology of native and invasive forest shrubs mediated by genome size

New Phytologist

Volumn 207, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 659-668

  Fridley, Jason D ^a   Craddock, Alaä ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological invasions; Budbreak; Deciduous forests; Flow cytometry; Nuclear DNA content (2C DNA)

Indexed keywords

BIOINDICATOR; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CELL ORGANELLE; DECIDUOUS FOREST; DNA; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; GENOME; GROWTH RATE; HABITAT TYPE; INVASIVE SPECIES; MONITORING; NATIVE SPECIES; PHENOLOGY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYLOGENETICS; SHRUB;

UNITED STATES;

FOREST; GENETICS; GENOME SIZE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INTRODUCED SPECIES; SEASON; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TREE;

FORESTS; GENOME SIZE; INTRODUCED SPECIES; SEASONS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TREES;

EID: 84936079194     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13384     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Arumuganathan K, Earle ED. 1991. Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 9: 229-241.
2. Augsperger CK, Chesseman JM, Salk CF. 2005. Light gains and physiological capacity of understorey woody plants during phenological avoidance of canopy shade. Functional Ecology 19: 537-546.
3. Beaulieu JM, Leitch IJ, Knight CA. 2007a. Genome size evolution in relation to leaf strategy and metabolic rates revisited. Annals of Botany 99: 495-505.
4. Beaulieu JM, Leitch IJ, Patel S, Pendharkar A, Knight CA. 2008. Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytologist 179: 975-986.
5. Beaulieu JM, Moles AT, Leitch IJ, Bennett MD, Dickie JB, Knight CA. 2007b. Correlated evolution of genome size and seed mass. New Phytologist 173: 422-437.
6. te Beest M, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, Brysting AK, Suda J, Kubešová M, Pyšek P. 2012. The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Annals of Botany 109: 19-45.
7. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: progress, problems and prospects. Annals of Botany 95: 45-90.
8. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ, Hanson L. 1998. DNA amounts in two samples of angiosperm weeds. Annals of Botany 82: 121-134.
9. Cavalier-Smith T. 2005. Economy, speed and size matter: evolutionary forces driving nuclear genome miniaturization and expansion. Annals of Botany 95: 147-175.
10. Chen GQ, Guo SL, Yin LP. 2010. Applying DNA C-values to evaluate invasiveness of angiosperms: validity and limitation. Biological Invasions 12: 1335-1348.
11. Darlington CD. 1965. Cytology. London, UK: Churchill.
12. Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW. 2006. Photoprotection in an ecological context: the remarkable complexity of thermal energy dissipation. New Phytologist 172: 11-21.
13. Dengler NG, Mackay LB, Gregory LM. 1975. Cell enlargement and tissue differentiation during leaf expansion in beech, Fagus grandifolia. Canadian Journal of Botany 53: 2846-2865.
14. Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J. 2007. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nature Protocols 2: 2233-2244.
15. Francis D, Barlow PW. 1988. Temperature and the cell cycle. In: Long SP, Woodward FI, eds. Plants and temperature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 181-201.
16. Francis D, Davies MS, Barlow PW. 2008. A strong nucleotypic effect on the cell cycle regardless of ploidy level. Annals of Botany 101: 747-757.
17. Fridley JD. 2008. Of Asian forests and European fields: Eastern U.S. plant invasions in a global floristic context. PLoS ONE 3: e3630.
18. Fridley JD. 2012. Extended leaf phenology and the autumn niche in deciduous forest invasions. Nature 485: 359-362.
19. Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell-cycle in intact plant-tissues. Science 220: 1049-1051.
20. Garcia S, Canela MA, Garnatje T, McArthur ED, Pellicer J, Sanderson SC, Valles J. 2008. Evolutionary and ecological implications of genome size in the North American endemic sagebrushes and allies (Artemisia, Asteraceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 94: 631-649.
21. Gelman A, Hill J. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Gelman A, Rubin DB. 1992. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science 7: 457-472.
23. Gleason HA, Cronquist A. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York, NY, USA: New York Botanic Garden.
24. Grafen A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 326: 119-157.
25. Gregory TR. 2005. The evolution of the genome. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Academic Press.
26. Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysak MA, Bennett MD. 2005. The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms 'genome size' and 'C-value' to describe nuclear DNA contents. Annals of Botany 95: 255-260.
27. Grime JP. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 111: 1169-1194.
28. Grime JP. 2006. Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
29. Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R. 1988. Comparative plant ecology. A functional approach to common British species. London, UK: Unwin Hyman Ltd.
30. Grime JP, Mowforth MA. 1982. Variation in genome size - an ecological interpretation. Nature 299: 151-153.
31. Grime JP, Shacklock JML, Band SR. 1985. Nuclear DNA contents, shoot phenology and species co-existence in a limestone grassland community. New Phytologist 100: 435-445.
32. Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M, Sanderson MJ, Rost TL. 2004. Evolution of genome size in pines (Pinus) and its life history correlates: supertree analyses. Evolution 58: 1705-1729.
33. Harrington RA, Brown BJ, Reich PB. 1989. Ecophysiology of exotic and native shrubs in southern Wisconsin. I. Relationship of leaf characteristics, resource availability, and phenology to seasonal patterns of carbon gain. Oecologia 80: 356-367.
34. Heberling JM, Fridley JD. 2013. Resource-use strategies of native and invasive plants in Eastern North American forests. New Phytologist 200: 523-533.
35. Hodgson JG, Sharafi M, Jalili A, Díaz S, Montserrat-Martí G, Palmer C, Cerabolini B, Pierce S, Hamzehee B, Asri Y et al. 2010. Stomatal vs. genome size in angiosperms: the somatic tail wagging the genomic dog? Annals of Botany 105: 573-584.
36. Jedrzejczyk I, Sliwinska E. 2010. Leaves and seeds as materials for flow cytometric estimation of the genome size of 11 Rosaceae woody species containing DNA-staining inhibitors. Journal of Botany 2010: 930895.
37. Knight CA, Beaulieu JM. 2008. Genome size scaling through phenotypic space. Annals of Botany 101: 759-766.
38. Knight CA, Molinari NA, Petrov DA. 2005. The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype. Annals of Botany 95: 177-190.
39. Körner CH. 1991. Some often overlooked plant characteristics as determinants of plant growth: a reconsideration. Functional Ecology 5: 162-173.
40. Körner CH. 2003. Alpine plant life: functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
41. Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG. 1997. Physiology of woody plants, 2nd edn. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press.
42. Kubešová M, Moravcova L, Suda J, Jarošík V, Pyšek P. 2010. Naturalized plants have smaller genomes than their non-invading relatives: a flow cytometric analysis of the Czech alien flora. Preslia 82: 81-96.
43. Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL. 1998. Plant physiological ecology. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
44. Lavergne S, Muenke NJ, Molofsky J. 2010. Genome size reduction can trigger rapid phenotypic evolution in invasive plants. Annals of Botany 105: 109-116.
45. Loureiro J, Rodriguez E, Doležel J, Santos C. 2007. Two new nuclear isolation buffers for plant DNA flow cytometry: a test with 37 species. Annals of Botany 100: 875-888.
46. Lynch M. 2007. The origins of genome architecture. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer.
47. Marie D, Brown SC. 1993. A cytometric exercise in plant DNA histograms, with 2C values for 70 species. Biology of the Cell 78: 41-51.
48. Martin PH, Canham CD, Marks PL. 2008. Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 142-149.
49. Melaragno JE, Mehrotra B, Coleman AW. 1993. Relationship between endopolyploidy and cell size in epidermal tissue of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11: 1661-1668.
50. Morgan HD, Westoby M. 2005. The relationship between nuclear DNA content and leaf strategy in seed plants. Annals of Botany 96: 1321-1330.
51. Ohri D. 2005. Climate and growth form: the consequences for genome size in plants. Plant Biology 7: 449-458.
52. Pagel M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401: 877-884.
53. Panchen ZA, Primack RB, Nordt B, Ellwood ER, Stevens AD, Renner SS, Willis CG, Fahey R, Whittemore A, Du Y et al. 2014. Leaf out times of temperate woody plants are related to phylogeny, deciduousness, growth habit and wood anatomy. New Phytologist 203: 1208-1219.
54. Pandit MK, White SM, Pocock MJ. 2014. The contrasting effects of genome size, chromosome number and ploidy level on plant invasiveness: a global analysis. New Phytologist 203: 697-703.
55. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289-290.
56. Plummer M. 2003. JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In: Hornik K, Leisch F, Zeileis A, eds. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing (DSC 2003). Vienna, Austria: Achim Zeileis.
57. R Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 3.03. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL http://www.R-project.org/
58. Rehder A. 1903. Synopsis of the genus Lonicera. Missouri Botanical Garden Annual Report 1903: 27-232.
59. Schierenbeck KA, Marshall JD. 1993. Seasonal and diurnal patterns of photosynthetic gas exchange for Lonicera sempervirens and L. japonica (Caprifoliaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 1292-1299.
60. Simmons MP, McKenna MJ, Bacon CD, Yakobson K, Cappa JJ, Archer RH, Ford AJ. 2012. Phylogeny of Celastraceae tribe Euonymeae inferred from morphological characters and nuclear and plastid genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62: 9-20.
61. Smith SA. 2009. Taking into account phylogenetic and divergence - time uncertainty in a parametric biogeographical analysis of the Northern Hemisphere plant clade Caprifolieae. Journal of Biogeography 36: 2324-2337.
62. Smith SA, Donoghue MJ. 2010. Combining historical biogeography with niche modeling in the Caprifolium clade of Lonicera (Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacales). Systematic Biology 59: 322-341.
63. Su Y-S, Yajima M. 2014. R2jags: a package for running JAGS from R. R package version 0.04-03. [WWW document] URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=R2jags
64. Theis N, Donoghue MJ, Li J. 2005. Phylogenetics of Caprifolieae and Lonicera (Dipsacales) based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 33: 776-783.
65. Thompson K. 1990. Genome size, seed size and germination temperature in herbaceous angiosperms. Evolutionary Trends in Plants 4: 113-116.
66. USDA, NRCS. 2015. The PLANTS database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC, USA. [WWW document] URL http://plants.usda.gov [accessed 18 March 2015].
67. Veselý P, Bureš P, Šmarda P, Pavlíček T. 2012. Genome size and DNA base composition of geophytes: the mirror of phenology and ecology? Annals of Botany 109: 65-75.
68. de Villemereuil P, Wells JA, Edwards RD, Blomberg SP. 2012. Bayesian models for comparative analysis integrating phylogenetic uncertainty. BMC Evolutionary Biology 12: 102.
69. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW. 2008. Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and character evolution. Bioinformatics 24: 2098-2100.
70. Webb CO, Donoghue MJ. 2005. Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Molecular Ecology Notes 5: 181-183.
71. Wikström N, Savolainen V, Chase MW. 2001. Evolution of angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268: 2211-2220.
72. Xu CY, Griffin KL, Schuster WSF. 2007. Leaf phenology and seasonal variation of photosynthesis of invasive Berberis thunbergii (Japanese barberry) and two co-occurring native understory shrubs in a northeastern United States deciduous forest. Oecologia 154: 11-21.