Core concept: Ecosystem services

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 24, 2015, Pages 7337-7338

  West, Amy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COGNITION; ECOSYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT; PEST CONTROL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECREATION; SHORT SURVEY; URBAN AREA; WATER MANAGEMENT; WELLBEING; WETLAND; ANIMAL; ECOLOGY; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; POLICY; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; HUMANS; PUBLIC POLICY; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 84935910122     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503837112     Document Type: Short Survey

References (17)

1. Daily GC, et al. (2000) Ecology. The value of nature and the nature of value. Science 289(5478):395-396.
2. Daily GC, Matson PA (2008) Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(28):9455-9456.
3. Bratman GN, Hamilton JP, Daily GC (2012) The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1249(1):118-136.
4. Ehrlich P, Mooney H (1983) Extinction, substitution, and ecosystem services. Bioscience 33(4):248-254.
5. Mooney H, Ehrlich P (1997) Ecosystem services: A fragmentary history. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, ed Daily G (Island Press, Washington, DC), pp 11-19.
6. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human-Being: General Synthesis. Available at www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Synthesis.html. Accessed May 4, 2015.
7. Ruckelshaus M, et al. (2013) Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real world decisions. Ecol Econ 115:11-21.
8. Daily G (2014) Mainstreaming the Values of Nature for People into decision making. Paper prepared for the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and the Pontifical Academy of Social Science Joint Workshop on Sustainable Nature: Our Responsibility. May 2-6, 2014, Vatican City.
9. Daily GC, et al. (2013) [Securing natural capital and human well-being: Innovation and impact in China]. Acta Ecologica Sinica 33(3):669-676. Chinese.
10. Liu J, Li S, Ouyang Z, Tam C, Chen X (2008) Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(28):9477-9482.
11. IUCN (2013) IUCN China takes lead in measuring the true value of nature. Available at www.iucn.org/zh/china/?12537/1/IUCN-China-takes-lead-in-measuring-the-true-value-of-nature. Accessed May 4, 2015.
12. Reyers B, et al. (2013) Getting the measure of ecosystem services: A social-ecological approach. Front Ecol Environ 11(5):268-273.
13. Mace GM (2014) Ecology. Whose conservation? Science 345(6204):1558-1560.
14. Lele S, et al. (2013) Ecosystem services: Origins, contributions, pitfalls, and alternatives. Conserv Soc 11(4):343-358.
15. Reyers B, et al. (2012) Finding common ground for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bioscience 62(5):503-507.
16. Mace GM, Norris K, Fitter AH (2012) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol 27(1):19-26.
17. McCauley DJ (2006) Selling out on nature. Nature 443(7107):27-28.