Why self-controlled feedback enhances motor learning: Answers from electroencephalography and indices of motivation

Human Movement Science

Volumn 43, Issue , 2015, Pages 23-32

  Grand, Kirk F ^a   Bruzi, Alessandro T ^b   Dyke, Ford B ^a   Godwin, Maurice M ^a   Leiker, Amber M ^a   Thompson, Andrew G ^a   Buchanan, Taylor L ^a   Miller, Matthew W ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF LAVRAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Feedback related negativity; Intrinsic motivation; Self controlled learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK RELATED NEGATIVITY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION INVENTORY; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION ASSESSMENT; MOTIVATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SELF CONTROL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VISUAL FEEDBACK; ADOLESCENT; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; BIOFEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGY; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF-CONTROL; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84935486319     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: 18727646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arbel Y., Goforth K., Donchin E. The good, the bad, or the useful? The examination of the relationship between the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and long-term learning outcomes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 25:1249-1260. 10.1162/jocn_a_00385.
2. Arbel Y., Murphy A., Donchin E. On the utility of positive and negative feedback in a paired-associate learning task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2014, 26:1445-1453. 10.1162/jocn_a_00617.
3. Badami R., VaezMousavi M., Wulf G., Namazizadeh M. Feedback after good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2011, 82:360-364. 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599765.
4. Banack H.R., Sabiston C.M., Bloom G.A. Coach autonomy support, basic need satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation of paralympic athletes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2011, 82:722-730. 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599809.
5. Black A.E., Deci E.L. The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education 2000, 84:740-756. 10.1002/1098-237X(200011).
6. Chiviacowsky S. Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2014, 15:505-510. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.05.003.
7. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2002, 73:408-415. 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040.
8. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G., Lewthwaite R. Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3:1-8. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00458.
9. Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., Aiken L.S. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences 2003, Routledge, New York. 3rd ed.
10. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior 1985, Plenum Publishing Co., New York.
11. Fairbrother J.T., Laughlin D.D., Nguyen T.V. Self-controlled feedback facilitates motor learning in both high and low activity individuals. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3:1-8. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00323.
12. Gehring W.J., Liu Y., Orr J.M., Carp J. The error-related negativity (ERN/Ne). The oxford handbook of event-related potential components 2012, Oxford University Press Inc., New York. S.J. Luck, E.S. Kappenman (Eds.).
13. Hancock G.R., Butler M.S., Fischman M.G. On the problem of two-dimensional error scores: Methods and analyses of accuracy, bias, and consistency. Journal of Motor Behavior 1995, 27:241-250.
14. Hansen S., Pfeiffer J., Patterson J.T. Self-control of feedback during motor learning: Accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control of feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior 2011, 43:113-119. 10.1080/00222895.2010.548421.
15. Jaccard J., Turrisi R. Interaction effects in multiple regression 2003, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
16. Janelle C.M., Barba D.A., Frehlich S.G., Tennant K., Cauraugh J.H. Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1997, 68:269-279. 10.1080/02701367.1997.10608008.
17. Janelle C.M., Kim J., Singer R.N. Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1995, 81:627-634. 10.2466/pms.1995.81.2.627.
18. Jõesaar H., Hein V., Hagger M.S. Youth athletes' perception of autonomy support from the coach, peer motivational climate and intrinsic motivation in sport setting: One-year effects. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2012, 13:257-262. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.12.001.
19. Luck S.J. An introduction to the event-related potential technique 2014, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 2nd ed.
20. Luft C.D.B., Nolte G., Bhattacharya J. High-learners present larger mid-frontal theta power and connectivity in response to incorrect performance feedback. Journal of Neuroscience 2013, 33:2029-2038. 10.1523/jneurosci.2565-12.2013.
21. Luft C.D.B., Takase E., Bhattacharya J. Processing graded feedback: Electrophysiological correlates of learning from small and large errors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2014, 26:1180-1193. 10.1162/jocn_a_00543.
22. Marco-Pallares J., Cucurell D., Münte T.F., Strien N., Rodriguez-Fornells A. On the number of trials needed for a stable feedback-related negativity. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:852-860. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01152.x.
23. McAuley E., Duncan T., Tammen V.V. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1989, 60:48-58. 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413.
24. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.
25. Oostenveld R., Praamstra P. The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clinical Neurophysiology 2001, 112:713-719. 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00527-7.
26. Ryan R.M. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 43:450-461. 10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450.
27. Saemi E., Wulf G., Varzaneh A.G., Zarghami M. Feedback after good versus poor trials enhances motor learning in children. Brazilian Journal of Physical Education and Sport 2011, 25:671-679. 10.1590/S1807-55092011000400011.
28. Sanli E.A., Patterson J.T., Bray S.R., Lee T.D. Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 3(1-17):2003. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00611.
29. Standage M., Duda J.L., Ntoumanis N. A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Education Psychology 2003, 95:97-110. 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.97.
30. Su Y., Reeve J. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review 2011, 23:159-188. 10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7.
31. Vallerand R.J., Gauvin L.I., Halliwell W.R. Negative effects of competition on children's intrinsic motivation. Journal of Social Psychology 1986, 126:649-656. 10.1080/00224545.1986.9713638.
32. Vallerand R.J., Reid G. On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. J. Sport Psychol. 1984, 6:94-102.
33. Wulf G. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: Implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 2007, 93:96-101. 10.1016/j.physio.2006.08.005.